Follow this blog:
RSS

Ford: Multiple technologies needed to boost fuel economy

By | September 14, 2011, 12:49 PM PDT

A Ford executives said Wednesday that there are no silver bullets when it comes to improving fuel economy in cars and it takes a wide range of efforts to move the efficiency needle.

Speaking at a UBS investment conference in Frankfurt, Germany Ford CFO Lewis Booth said the company’s diesel Focus ECOnetic will have fuel economy on par with the Toyota Prius. But diesel is just one part of the equation.

Here’s what Booth had to say:

EcoBoost is the big story in North America, also available here in Europe, but, of course, diesels are very important in Europe. So yesterday we launched our Focus ECOnetic that will be on sale the middle of next year at 89 grams per kilometer. To put that in context, that is the lowest conventionally engine C-car in the business and is about equal I think to a Toyota Prius full hybrid. We also launched a Fiesta at 87 grams, which is close to the lowest in its segment.

As you know, we believe that there aren’t silver bullet solutions on fuel economy that we will need an array of technologies going from the simple stuff like reduced parasitic losses, radiator blinds, smart alternators, and the like. Through substantially improved gas engines, primarily EcoBoost, our continued improvements in diesels, and moving all our transmissions towards six speed.

Those various technologies allow Ford to boost fuel economy ahead of a move toward more electric and hybrid vehicles. Ford will have five electric vehicles by the end of 2013.

On other topics, Booth noted that Ford has 80 percent common parts for the Focus, but can’t get to 100 percent because of things like diesel engines, which are common in Europe. In any case, diesel engines get Ford’s fuel economy up even as it’s a rare option outside of Europe.

Related:

Ford, Bug Labs team up on fuel efficiency data module for cars

Ford unveils Evos concept; intelligent hybrid car built for the cloud

CNET: Ford presents unified tech vision in Evos concept

CNET: Ford Evos concept: Smoother than kinetic (photos)


Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Larry Dignan

About Larry Dignan

Larry Dignan is the editor-in-chief of SmartPlanet.

Larry Dignan

Larry Dignan

Editor-in-Chief

Larry Dignan is editor-in-chief of SmartPlanet and ZDNet. He is also editorial director of TechRepublic. Previously, he was an editor at eWeek, Baseline and CNET News. He has written for WallStreetWeek.com, Inter@ctive Week, New York Times and Financial Planning. He holds degrees from the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism and the University of Delaware. He is based in New York but resides in Pennsylvania.

Follow him on Twitter.

Larry Dignan

Larry Dignan
Larry Dignan does not hold any investments in the companies he covers.
If you liked this, don't miss...
4
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+2 Votes
+ -
Diesel
It's just too bad we're not allowed to have the diesel versions here in the US. Literally all of the manufacturers for Europe make some great turbo diesel cars and trucks that work better than the gas models here. While in Scotland I drove a full crew cab Ford Ranger with a 6 x 4 box, turbo diesel and manual transmission. Worked fantastic, great mileage, pulled well and went like stink. Can we get it here? Nope. Same for a lot of the diesel versions of cars there. Too bad we can't have them here.
Posted by GregGold
15th Sep 2011
+1 Vote
+ -
The big incentive
Tax gasoline and use the money for mass transit in a partnership program with the auto makers. They are in the transportation business, not just the car business. This will do two things: 1. Drive people into smaller cars (a very good thing for many reasons), and 2. create a bigger demand for mass transit (we are *way* behind other countries). A six-dollar gallon of gas will change many minds very quickly. Might even stop us from over eating so we can actually fit in smaller cars happy
Posted by Lucky2BHere
15th Sep 2011
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: The big incentive
Unfortunately in the Denver metro area, it's already so heavily subsidized that the passengers pay about 20% of the actual cost of bus or light rail and there's still no ridership - because it doesn't go anywhere the majority of the people need to go. So is all that does is waste the taxpayer's money - and that's definitely not appropriate. A great many of us don't mind something that makes economic sense but subsidizing a useless system is not one of them.

If I can drive 25 minutes each way to work (for a 12 hour day) or take mass transit (2 hours 45 minutes each way), I and a lot of other people will gladly pay the fuel prices. If it were a functional system..fine, since it's not, it's not fine. I already pay over 1% tax on most everything I purchase as a subsidy for a useless system. I don't need to pay anymore!
Posted by GregGold
15th Sep 2011
+1 Vote
+ -
Electric cars
I have Ford's "silver bullit" for electric cars. Guaranteed! If Ford is interested, the campany can contact me. Needs no gas. Never will have to be plugged in to electricity anywhere. I am waiting to hear from you Ford Motor Company.
Posted by haggertywe
27th Sep 2011
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!