Follow this blog:
RSS

First wave power farm in U.S. to be built in Oregon

By | February 24, 2010, 12:53 PM PST

Construction on the first commercial wave-energy farm in the United States has begun off the coastline of Oregon.

The farm, which draws its power from the energy of ocean surface waves, is expected to power about 400 homes, according to a report in USA Today.

New Jersey-based developer Ocean Power Technologies is spearheading the $60 million project, which is located at a site in Reedsport, Ore.

Here’s how it works: As a float on a buoy rises and falls with the waves, it drives a plunger up and down, which is connected to a hydraulic pump that converts the vertical movement into rotary motion that drives an electrical generator.

Once electricity is produced, it’s sent to shore via a submerged cable.

A total of 10 buoys are planned for deployment by 2012. The first buoy will measure 150 feet tall by 40 feet wide, weigh 200 tons and cost $4 million.

While some people are skeptical of putting waves to work in a cost-effective manner, the concept makes sense. After all, why not take advantage of water that’s already moving?

(One suggestion: whether we ought to take advantage of the wind that’s causing them instead.)

But the real problem is that waves are awfully unpredictable, and vary widely in height and strength. Too-large waves can damage equipment, but too-small waves aren’t cost-effective for power generation.

Not to mention the environmental and economic concerns with creating “off-limits” areas of the ocean miles from the shore.

The world’s first commercial wave farm, the Aguçadoura Wave Farm, opened in 2008 in Portugal, but ran into dire financial straits and was suspended indefinitely (.pdf).

Hopefully, Ocean Power won’t run into such problems — another one of its projects is for the U.S. Marine Corps base in Hawaii.

Here’s a great broadcast report on the wave power effort:

Related: CBS 3 Philadelphia: The benefits of Ocean Power Technology

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Andrew Nusca

About Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca is the editor of SmartPlanet.

Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca

Editor

Andrew Nusca is editor of SmartPlanet and an associate editor for ZDNet. Previously, he worked at Money, Men's Vogue and Popular Mechanics magazines. He holds degrees from the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism and New York University. He based in New York but resides in Philadelphia.

Follow him on Twitter.

Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca
Andrew Nusca does not hold any investments in the companies he covers.
If you liked this, don't miss...
7
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
RE: First wave power farm in U.S. to be built in Oregon
Finally somthing promissing, efficent and logical.
Posted by mario@...
24th Feb 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: First wave power farm in U.S. to be built in Oregon
Is this WAVE generation subsidized by the Federal Government or the State of Oregon? What is the cost per kilowatt and how does that compare with coal fired or natural gas fired power plants? Could larger conventional power plants, that would serve more people, be built for the same money?

New technologies should only be adopted at public expense when they achieve parity in the market place with existing technologies without government support.
Posted by Repeal
25th Feb 2010
0 Votes
+ -
water not from wind
Wind is not the primary source of waves. Ocean currents caused by warmer waters flowing to cooler (or vice versa) are solar powered. Also the moon's orbit affects tidal patterns. Wind plays very little role in tides.
Posted by chefp
25th Feb 2010
0 Votes
+ -
you're not factoring in hidden costs, Repeal
Repeal - Coal & fossil fueled plants might be cheaper in the short term, but the pollution is a hidden cost that is often ignored. The cost of pollution is real: detrimental health effects, poisoning of the waters and land, greenhouse gases etc. Then there's dependence on non-renewable resources (how much domestic coal/gas supply is enough? Probably not as plentiful as you think). Taking the Big View, renewable energy such as wave power are competitive.
Posted by chefp
25th Feb 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: First wave power farm in U.S. to be built in Oregon
60,000,000 for 400 homes works out to 150,000 per home. Is this NUTS or what?
Posted by raykirk@...
25th Feb 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: First wave power farm in U.S. to be built in Oregon
The 1st coal fired power plants were much more expensive than they are now. The 1st cars were extremely expensive until Ford pioneered mass-production. This wave power generator is the FIRST in the US, it's not surprising that it's pricier.
You'd think that since you're using a computer, you'd understand how technology drives prices down as production expands.
Posted by chefp
26th Feb 2010
0 Votes
+ -
going back to the $150,000 per home comment...
a similar, more in depth, and possibly easier math for people to
understand.

This math uses assumptions, if you are not comfortable with
assumptions, then just don't read this comment.

assuming the average electrical usage for someone in Oregon, near
the coastline, is $200 per month, taking the given 400 homes, that
is $80,000 per month of electrical costs. Again this is assuming
that the electric company will charge the same rate as for the
previous energy source. now we (hopefully) all know there are 12
months in a year. 12 x $80,000 is $960,000 of electrical charges
per year. To make this math easier, I will round it to $1,000,000
per year. This means that it will take 60 years to cover the
installation costs of the project.
Posted by aiellenon
1st Mar 2010
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!