Follow this blog:
RSS

First Solar lays off 2,000 people; where’s the bottom?

By | April 17, 2012, 9:28 AM PDT

As solar energy equipment manufacturers continue to drop like flies in the wake of economic duress, you’ve got to wonder: where’s the bottom?

Sun-powered favorite First Solar this morning announced that it would lay off 2,000 people worldwide, or 30 percent of its overall headcount. The cuts are a combination of personnel reductions in Europe and the U.S., the idling of four (!) production lines in Kulim, Malaysia and the outright closing of a plant in Frankfurt, Germany.

That’s a sobering reality for a company who planned on scaling up and building out just two years ago.

Interim CEO Mike Ahearn explains where the pain is coming from:

After a thorough analysis, it is clear the European market has deteriorated to the extent that our operations there are no longer economically sustainable, and maintaining those operations is not in the best long-term interest of our stakeholders. Decisions like this are not easy, especially given how important the European markets and our associates in Europe have been to the development of our Company and the solar industry as a whole. We are committed to treating all affected associates fairly, and to building our relationships with European business partners that are aligned with our strategy of pursuing utility-scale solar opportunities in sustainable markets around the world.

The solar market has fundamentally changed, and we are quickly adapting our market approach and operations to maintain and build upon our competitive advantage. After a period of robust growth, First Solar is scaled to operate at higher volumes than currently exist following the reduction of subsidies in key legacy markets. As a result, it is essential that we reduce production and decrease expenses to reflect the smaller volume of high-probability demand we forecast. These actions will enable us to focus our resources on developing the markets where we expect to generate significant growth in coming years.

It’s quite a turnaround. In 2010, the company planned to invest $365 million for eight new production lines in Malaysia, build a two-line factory in France, and increase capacity from 23 to 34 product lines by 2012.

The economy was hardly in good shape then, but we’re still seeing the penny-pinching, deleveraging effects of the 2008 global downturn as various regions cope at their own speeds — in particular Europe, whose governments reduced or ended solar subsidies as they sought to get their own financial houses in order. Add to that the growing dominance of Chinese manufacturers, who have been particularly adept at driving down the price of solar products, and you’ve got a downward death spiral few companies have the coffers to withstand.

Which prompts the question: where’s the bottom? And is there a way for any company to climb out of this hole on their own?

Chart: From First Solar’s 2010 Guidance

Related on SmartPlanet:

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Andrew Nusca

About Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca is the editor of SmartPlanet.

Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca

Editor

Andrew Nusca is editor of SmartPlanet and an associate editor for ZDNet. Previously, he worked at Money, Men's Vogue and Popular Mechanics magazines. He holds degrees from the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism and New York University. He based in New York but resides in Philadelphia.

Follow him on Twitter.

Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca
Andrew Nusca does not hold any investments in the companies he covers.
If you liked this, don't miss...
7
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
-3 Votes
+ -
Solar, Less Expensive But Less Connected...
While the overall cost of Solar is dropping almost monthly because of both new developments and the evolution of new marketing strategies; the entire Solar Industry is being "punked" by the more traditional Energy providers (Big Nuclear, Big Coal and Big Gas). These BIG's have the Political connections to limit Solar's market share from increasing, (which would cut into their bottom lines) because these Political Leaders control the lending that is now required for any public Energy project.

Adding to this problem is the fact that our Utilities, despite giving lip service to Greener Solar (of all flavors), have rate structures that not only pay solar panel owners a fraction of what these same Utilities charge for the same Energy. This not only increases the pay back period for those that would install solar but actually adds to their shareholder windfall profits that many Utilities have been paying lately. By paying out less for the same energy these "owners" put into the grid than they charge, the Utilities are preventing the production of Energy from evolving from only large Utility owned generators to much smaller rooftop systems that generate the Energy where it is needed, especially during the daytime when Energy needs are the highest!

Unless Legislation is passed to prevent these "solar" rate payers from getting ripped off, these same Utilities will continue to invest in their own Big Solar Projects in order to profit from both their customers choice of Utility owned "remote" GREEN energy and their own "controlled" production, which allows them to maximize their bottom line.

We hear much talk about making American workers more competitive in the World's market place but we never hear a whisper about reducing the cost of American Energy which is a major factor in the cost of our manufacturing.

Today all American's are being held hostage by their utilities, that are in effect "PUBLIC Monopoly's," as they game the system to maximize their own shareholder profits instead of keeping the cost of Energy low as possible and or allowing ratepayers to help supply the GRID with their own Solar energy that is locally produced during peak usage periods!
Posted by CaptD
18th Apr 2012
+3 Votes
+ -
Natural Forces
The Solar industry grew for the last 15 or so years by generous subsidies in Europe and North America. Plus a bunch in parts of Asia.

What we are seeing here is just the result of those artificial market distortions being reduced in the tough economic times we are currently under.

The costs of Solar Electric Power are higher than almost any other generation method. The large growth of the industry was more due to publicity and politics than to market demand. Now, they are falling down to the market demand level. There is still a demand for solar electric power, but it has to be competitive with other sources of power. For base load power, it just isn't. For peak power, it can be. For remote power, it is a good fit sometimes.

Many years ago, Solar was more expensive by over 10X. Now, it's just around 2X verses the cost of say, Nuclear. That represents a great improvement, but it is still too expensive to be a major global industry on it's own.

Market Distortion can only take you so far. Sooner or later, you have to compete economically. What politics can do, it has done. Now, we see that the major Solar companies cannot survive on their own.

Solar is still a niche product. A growing niche, but still a niche.
Posted by YetAnotherBob
18th Apr 2012
-3 Votes
+ -
The cost of Nuclear vs... vs Solar...
Energy Subsidies Black, Not Green
http://www.eli.org/pdf/Energy_Subsidies_Black_Not_Green.pdf
snip
A study released by the Environmental Law Institute, a nonpartisan research and policy organization, shows that the federal government has provided substantially larger subsidies to fossil fuels than to renewables. Subsidies to fossil fuels totaled approxi- mately $72 billion over the seven-year study period, while subsidies for renewable fuels totaled $29 billion over the same period.
Posted by CaptD
18th Apr 2012
+3 Votes
+ -
How about this concept.
End all energy subsidies and let the taxpayers keep their money.
Posted by Hates Idiots
18th Apr 2012
+4 Votes
+ -
Such is the beauty of subsidies
Over time, it makes it literally impossible to know the real cost of doing anything, which favors the political establishment while preventing the economy to function efficiently. True innovation and efficiency will suffer while the taxpayers will be made to pay for both the established players and the favor-of-the-moment cronies.

We'd all be better off if we cut the subsidies and let the market decide.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
Updated - 18th Apr 2012
+1 Vote
+ -
Subsidies
Using YOUR subsidy figures renewable fuels got about 29% of the subsidies and provided about 7% of the energy.
Posted by jimofil
18th Apr 2012
+2 Votes
+ -
They found themselves in a hole,
and they stopped digging.
Good for them.
Posted by juu@...
18th Apr 2012
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!