Follow this blog:
RSS

FDA proposes new rules for nanotechnology

By | April 22, 2012, 3:03 PM PDT

Nanotechnology is already being used in a range of products from sunscreens to clothing. But the safety of these tiny engineered particles has been overlooked, until now.

On Friday, FDA issued draft guidelines for food and cosmetics companies that want to use nanoparticles, which are measured in billionths of a meter, in their products. Under the guidelines, FDA will require food companies to provide more data to confirm the safety of packaging that uses nanotechnology. FDA also drafted suggestions for the use of such materials in cosmetics.

Reuters reports:

Nanoparticles may be able to penetrate the skin, or move between organs, with unknown health benefits.

“Understanding nanotechnology remains a top priority,” FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg said in a statement. “FDA is strengthening the scientific tools and methods for evaluating food products, cosmetics, drugs and medical devices.”

When companies started using nanoparticles in their packaging material, they were able to consider them as “generally recognized as safe,” because nanotechnology manipulates materials that are already safe, just on a very small scale.

But, FDA said, “because materials in the nanoscale dimension may have different chemical, physical or biological properties from their larger components,” the technology should be monitored.

That’s especially important because the use of nanotechnology is growing and scientists believe it could one day be used in medicine.

“This is an emerging, evolving technology and we’re trying to get ahead of the curb to ensure the ingredients and substances are safe,” Dennis Keefe, director of FDA’s office of food additive safety told AP.

The FDA will have a 90-day comment period on the proposals.

FDA says nanotech may need extra testing  [Reuters], FDA proposes rules for nanotechnology in food  [AP]

Photo via FDA

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Amy Kraft

About Amy Kraft

Amy Kraft was a contributing editor for SmartPlanet in 2012.

Amy Kraft

Amy Kraft

Contributing Editor

Amy Kraft is a freelance writer based in New York. She has written for New Scientist and DNAinfo and has produced podcasts for Scientific American's 60-Second-Science. She holds degrees from CUNY Graduate School of Journalism and the University of Illinois at Chicago.

Follow her on Twitter.

Amy Kraft

Amy Kraft

Amy Kraft does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what she covers.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
2
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+1 Vote
+ -
Good to Study Nano Particles
It is a good thing to study nano particles in regard to safety. Some nano particles are small enough to slip through cell walls in a body. Nano technology has some good potential but it also has potential to cause health problems along the line with asbestosis and black lung disease.
Posted by sboverie
23rd Apr 2012
0 Votes
+ -
Unknown health benefits?
I thought that the quote from the Roiters article was a bit too hopeful. Why would there be an expectation of unknown benefits. Perhaps the author meant to write "unknown risks" or to put a positive (maybe) spin on it, "unknown impacts". Of course if Donald Rumsfeld had been the author, it would have read "unknown unknowns". My take on it, if I had been the author would have read "unintended consequences".
Posted by PSFTGURU@...
23rd Apr 2012
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!