Follow this blog:
RSS

Europe uncertainty casts pall over First Solar, solar industry

By | May 4, 2011, 7:45 AM PDT

First Solar indicated that Europe’s solar market is uncertain as countries end incentives and retool policies. As a result, the solar power system company is increasingly reliant on North America and developing markets for future growth.

The worries overshadowed what were better-than-expected first quarter results. First Solar reported first quarter earnings of $115.96 million, or $1.33 a share, on revenue of $567.3 million, down slightly from a year ago due to lower average selling prices. Wall Street was looking for earnings of $1.16 a share on revenue of $544.4 million.

However, First Solar did see its inventory build.

The company also reiterated its 2011 outlook that calls for sales between $3.7 billion and $3.8 billion with earnings per share of $9.25 to $9.75. That outlook disappointed a few analysts, who were looking for First Solar to raise its projections for 2011.

On a conference call, First Solar CEO Rob Gillette’s commentary on Europe was described as morose by analysts. European countries have been cutting incentives for solar panel installations and it’s hurting demand. Here are a few snippets from Gillette:

  • “In Europe we are managing through market uncertainty due to FiT (feed in tariff) and policy changes. Ambiguity about the magnitude of Germany’s midyear FiT conversion, lack of clarity with respect to Frankfurt’s tender process, and Italy’s delayed implementation of the new decree all created uncertainties about project economics and financing. Industry channels are adversely impacted by the lack of transparency around pending policy revisions or contemplated FiT changes”.
  • “In Europe, Germany, France and Italy are implementing changes to their feed-in tariff structures, market caps and tender processes. The industry will require a period of adjustment and understanding of the changes since some of the implementation details have not been finalized. In addition, the Italian government decision-making process resulted in a market pause and excess channel inventories. Rising European interest rates are also applying pressure to project economics.”
  • “In France the government revised the FiT program and implemented a 500 megawatt cab on the annual market size and introduced a tender system for large projects. We are disappointed that the new decree does not provide sufficient multiyear visibility and certainty for our sizable French PV market. The government has failed to take into account the needs of investors in existing projects. We are now waiting for details about the tender system before making a decision about the long-term viability of the market, and our French factory remains on indefinite hold. Because of grandfather projects, the French market should exceed the cap in 2011 and range from 500 to 800 megawatts this year.”
  • “Italy remains unclear with regards to both an extension of their current program, CE3, and the timing and terms of the new program, CE4. But it is clear, however, that the existing delay in FiT clarity will require a quarter or more to restart project financing and development. Further delay in FiT details will continue to impact project realization, as well as future project planning and development. We are actively engaging in the FiT policy discussions and monitoring the situation.”

So what’s the plan? Gillette said it is focusing on North America solar buildouts, China, Australia and the Middle East.

Stifel Nicolaus analyst Jeff Osborne said that First Solar’s financial results will be heavily weighted on the second half of 2011. Osborne said in a research note:

First Solar’s increasingly morose commentary on the near-term European market demand and pricing outlook adds to the increasing list of cautious data points highlight the issues that the entire solar industry faces. We believe First Solar’s management team has laid out a path of channel diversity both geographically and through effective use of self-developed projects to navigate the choppy markets.

Other solar players won’t be able to manage Europe’s changing dynamics.

Related:

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Larry Dignan

About Larry Dignan

Larry Dignan is the editor-in-chief of SmartPlanet.

Larry Dignan

Larry Dignan

Editor-in-Chief

Larry Dignan is editor-in-chief of SmartPlanet and ZDNet. He is also editorial director of TechRepublic. Previously, he was an editor at eWeek, Baseline and CNET News. He has written for WallStreetWeek.com, Inter@ctive Week, New York Times and Financial Planning. He holds degrees from the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism and the University of Delaware. He is based in New York but resides in Pennsylvania.

Follow him on Twitter.

Larry Dignan

Larry Dignan
Larry Dignan does not hold any investments in the companies he covers.
If you liked this, don't miss...
4
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+1 Vote
+ -
Stop while we have a chance.
We are at the beginning of this self destructive, economy wrecking path, so there is still a chance to prevent damage. We should take the hint from those who walked before us, namely all of Europe, and abandon what has been collective failure in Europe.

Try different policies if you must, but do not repeat the failed policies of others.
Posted by Hates Idiots
4th May 2011
+1 Vote
+ -
But what if it's actually their goal...
...to turn us into a European-like socialist state? Then these policies are right-on.

First Solar only exists because of subsidies from all over the globe. This ties them to the politics of the moment, which at the moment means austerity is Europe. It's the roller coaster they bought the ticket for.

And it's not like we haven't done this before either: "The history of alternative energy, though, is one of generous subsidies followed by a painful reckoning of the costs. Jimmy Carters Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978, known as PURPA, led to tens of billions of dollars of alternative energy projects, including some early solar. But paying above-market electricity rates to subsidize the projects became so costly that it was eventually curtailed." (From Forbes)

I guess we need to re-live this every generation. Inflation is now. Next up; gas lines?
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
Updated - 4th May 2011
-1 Votes
+ -
Socialism in the enregy marketplace?
Why not? Government allocations help subsidize Winter heating bills for those unable to afford them, especially in the North. Is that too much socialism for you? Let's see . . ."Government for the people, by the people" isn't exactly your cup of tea - is it? I suppose "Government by the rich, for the rich" is more to your liking. And that's just the case in the U.S. anymore. When the rich run things they'll make laws to make them richer. This will no longer be "The Land of Opportunity". It all starts with the fact that our elected representatives have to buy campaign time and rely on rich donors to fund them. Once in office they bow to the funders and are obliged to repay them with legislation policies favoring them - not the people. It's all wrong. The rich are buying our country out from under us. Count the number of 'discouraged workers' who've spent their last dollar on job searching and can seek no longer. Those ranks grows daily and is indicative of a government who couldn't care less about its people. Unemployment statistics mean nothing. And BTW, Europe is actually doing well with their socialist energy policies. Much better then us, anyway. Look at Iceland and Germany
Posted by edrule@...
8th May 2011
0 Votes
+ -
In case you haven't noticed...
...Europe is on an unsustainable track towards bankruptcy. Greece is just the beginning. Portugal is next. Then Spain. How long will German taxpayers put up with that before they start their own tea party movement?

When you subsidize something, you just get more of if. So if you subsidize poverty, you will get more of it. You will get the votes of those being subsidized, and the votes of those who provide the goods & services to those who get subsidized. Ironically enough, these are really the "Government by the rich of the rich" you mention.

Either way, it's not sustainable. Just ask those in Iceland.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
10th May 2011
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!