Follow this blog:
RSS

Despite Civil War-era pipes, Americans resist water infrastructure renovation

By | March 15, 2010, 9:01 AM PDT

A significant water line bursts, on average, every two minutes in the United States, according to a New York Times analysis of data from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

In a new report under the headline, “Saving U.S. Water and Sewer Systems Would Be Costly,” a Washington public official — George Hawkins, who heads the District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority — is profiled as an environmentalist who must persuade residents to accept higher water rates so the utility can replace antiquated pipes.

How antiquated, you ask? In Washington, there is a pipe break every day. And according to EPA data, thousands of water and sewer systems across the country may be too old to function properly — so old, in fact, that some were built during the Civil War.

The situation: People have grown accustomed to extremely inexpensive water delivery and sewage disposal, leaving no funds to maintain the system that makes those services possible.

The problem: Pipes are bursting every day, damaging streets and homes and allowing sewage to seep into drinking water supplies.

Hawkins, in the report:

“People pay more for their cellphones and cable television than for water. You can go a day without a phone or TV. You can’t go a day without water.”

The rub: Officials in cities such as Los Angeles, Indianapolis, Sacramento and Washington, D.C. have tried to raise rates. But residents won’t give in.

The battle has even reached the Obama administration. In last year’s stimulus bill, federal lawmakers allocated more than $10 billion in a “trust fund” for water infrastructure programs. (See the full breakdown of the bill here; see the EPA’s current budget here.)

But as with public transit systems, regular people don’t feel that a rate hike is necessary to close the gap.

Clearly, it’s difficult to motivate residents when most folks don’t pay attention to water and sewer systems until they’re broken.

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Andrew Nusca

About Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca is editor of SmartPlanet.

Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca

Editor

Andrew Nusca is editor of SmartPlanet and an associate editor for ZDNet. Previously, he worked at Money, Men's Vogue and Popular Mechanics magazines. He holds degrees from the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism and New York University. He based in New York but resides in Philadelphia.

Follow him on Twitter.

Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca
Andrew Nusca does not hold any investments in the companies he covers.
If you liked this, don't miss...
6
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
Have you considered that the citizens may be right?
After all, if current water rates are sufficient to repair the existing system at a satisfactory level, then what are the real advantages to them for spending more of a "new" system that does not offer the citizens any additional perceived value?

Not that I completely agree with that. I'm just playing "devils advocate".
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
16th Mar 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Despite Civil War-era pipes, Americans resist water infrastructure renovation
My local sewage providor just charged us a $150 fee on top of normal service for just this, to fund the repair / replacement of the sewer system.

Nice thing is for our particular neighborhood, it does not appear any thing is planned for this year.


In our previous neighborhood the city did have the sewer lines re-lined. Don't remember being charged for this. That was maybe 8 - 10 years ago, so I could be forgetful!
Posted by jhimes
16th Mar 2010
0 Votes
+ -
Privatize like the UK ?
In 1989 Regan's friend Margaret Thatcher privatized the UK's water and sewer systems. The result, shortages, price increases of 50% in the first four years. Profit margins ranged from 36.5% to 59.7%. Executive compensation increased between 22% and 253% (Wall street bankers anyone?) sewer flooding and pollution due to sewer failure increased. The UK government wrote off (i.e. gave away to industry)L4.95 billion, ($8.78 billion US at the then current exchange rate).
Posted by Oreamnos_americanus
16th Mar 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Despite Civil War-era pipes, Americans resist water infrastructure renovation
The problem isn't just the pipes. It is also the availability of clean, potable water in sufficient quantities to meet the needs of society. The easy sources are fully utilized or in many cases over utilized. Old pipes exacerbate the real problem of scarcity by wasting water, but aren't the root of the problem.
Posted by rbdemuth
16th Mar 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Despite Civil War-era pipes, Americans resist water infrastructure renovation
When the water supply fails due to a major failure of the system, people will suddenly find that water is the most vital thing .

Without it you are dead in 3-4 days

The stupidity of your population is truly incredible .
Posted by elderlybloke
16th Mar 2010
0 Votes
+ -
The entire system is unlikely to fail at once.
It's more of an economic issue. At some point, it will become cheaper
to do a major overhaul vs here-and-there fixes. Until that point, it's
it's better to do the latter.

Do you replace your entire engine every time you need new tires?
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
17th Mar 2010
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!