Follow this blog:
RSS

Data confirms: self-checkout encourages efficiency, theft

By | April 9, 2012, 6:13 AM PDT

On paper, the self-checkout lane is a godsend for retail stores. It costs a lot of money to staff cash registers with real people. Why not let the customer do the work?

Aside from the fact that these machines encourage sluggish behavior — in my experience, it always takes at least twice as long to pay for my goods in a self-checkout lane, despite my best efforts — it turns out that they also attract less-than-honest activity: shoplifting.

Malay Kundu, founder of retail video analytics firm Stoplift, explains to USA Today just how bad the problem is:

Kundu’s company has seen people scanning their Starbucks as bananas, leaving their items in the cart or reusable bag instead of scanning them and overloading the bagging area so that un-scanned merchandise can be piled on without being sensed.

Theft is five times higher in self-checkout lanes, according to the report. Stores such as Home Depot use employees to monitor self-checkout lanes, but the problem persists.

While Walmart and CVS add self-service lanes, other stores are removing them for “customer service” reasons, which includes theft and inconvenience. Still, the tech is predicted to grow by 10 percent in the next few years, according to research firm IHL Group.

New, smarter, more sensitive systems promise faster turnover and reduced theft — but as always, the proof of the pudding is in the eating.

Unless the pudding has been pilfered, that is.

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Andrew Nusca

About Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca is the editor of SmartPlanet.

Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca

Editor

Andrew Nusca is editor of SmartPlanet and an associate editor for ZDNet. Previously, he worked at Money, Men's Vogue and Popular Mechanics magazines. He holds degrees from the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism and New York University. He based in New York but resides in Philadelphia.

Follow him on Twitter.

Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca
Andrew Nusca does not hold any investments in the companies he covers.
If you liked this, don't miss...
6
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
Self checkout.
These damn things put half of my family out of work!!! I refuse to use one, I will wait my turn in line.
Posted by mattsy
9th Apr 2012
0 Votes
+ -
Why should customers do all the work?
Why should customers have to do all the work of checking out? It's bad enough that half the time I have to bag the groceries myself because the store does not provide enough baggers.

What's next, stocking the shelves ourselves?
Posted by zackers
9th Apr 2012
0 Votes
+ -
Self Checkout Issues
Andrew, this article pretty much hits the nail on the head of the self-checkout issues, including:

- Takes longer to checkout.
- Customer cheating.
- Elminates the checker, but adds "monitor" personnel.

If a store wants me to check my own stuff, then they should add a discount to self-checked items.

I avoid self-checkout like the plague, with one exception. If there are long lines and I have one item that weighs more than a few onces.
Posted by bb_apptix
10th Apr 2012
0 Votes
+ -
The only reason I use them...
...is because I hate standing in line. They don't take any longer to check out than standing in line does.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
10th Apr 2012
0 Votes
+ -
I see one useful idea
put up by bb_apptix.
If we use the self-checkout, we should get a discount. Good idea, though I doubt it will be implemented.

As for speed of a self-check-out. I often go faster than with a 'checked' line, but have seen people who don't have a clue and take forever.

For the 'adds monitor personnel', yes, one for every 2-8 self-checks, from what I've seen. Still saves the market money in terms of manpower.
Posted by jonrosen
10th Apr 2012
0 Votes
+ -
CVS- more expensive plus "forced" self checkout????
My local CVS recently adopted the "strongly encouraged" self checkout system. The monitors are always hostile, particularly if I ask for standard check out. When I explain I don't like self checkout, they get even ruder. Don't they realize the "self check out" feature has cost them hours and pay? There is usually no place to set down the basket so you can get into your purse if needed (or adjust the child you're holding). There is always something wrong with one of the prices of the items you're buying. The scanner doesn't like your coupon for some reason. If the monitor has to step in to assist, what's the point of self check out? It's great if I'm buying one item and the regular cashier has a long line. Other than that, I'd rather wait in line and get service. I have actually stopped going to CVS for this reason.
Posted by Jane2012
16th Nov
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!