Follow this blog:
RSS

DARPA seeks to track genetic changes, protect patented genes

By | March 31, 2011, 6:38 AM PDT

DARPA, the U.S. Department of Defense’s research arm, posted a solicitation earlier this month seeking a method and technology that can be used to track changes in a microorganism.

The official notice:

This solicitation is specifically for multidisciplinary research proposals in the area of genomic and proteomic technologies that can continuously and persistently record specific natural or human promulgated environmental, physical and genomic events within the genetic or epigenetic systems of microorganisms.

That may be Greek to some, but Madhumita Venkataramanan takes a crack at it over at Wired’s Danger Room blog:

Sounds to me like Darpa wants to create a digital spy technology that is encoded into the genes of a living bug. It will apparently record and report on any modifications being made to the bug itself – kind of like the Track Changes option in your Word document.

In the full solicitation, DARPA comes right out with it, saying that it seeks to monitor changes in organisms with patented genes — of their own design, and of other research organizations’. (The program’s official name: “Chronicle of Lineage Indicative of Origins.”)

Bits from the solicitation:

  • The program “seeks to enhance biological security and the protection of genomic intellectual property in the global biocommodities community.”
  • It seeks to develop “safe and secure systems for encoding non-hereditary events into the genome of viruses and prokaryotes.”
  • And the reason: to “enable the protection and authentication of intellectual property in high value organisms, ensuring compliance with agreements during licensure for foreign manufacturing and exoneration of laboratories, institutions, and states in incidents involving misuse.”
  • It will do that via the capability to “record information and potentially to report on environmental events during research or commercial activities.”

Among the events DARPA seeks to record? Growth conditions, cell metabolism, division, genetic manipulation such as introduction of antibiotic resistance, animal passage or large-scale growth.

The agency suggests that the answer lies in a “cryptographical or complex mathematical approach” — one that can’t be altered by evolution or modification — incorporated into a microbe’s metabolic or genomic processes.

Hey, you never know: the next Cold War could be fought at the genetic level. Is that a Russian gene in my soup?

In all seriousness, however, the solicitation is interesting because of how it impacts the highly contentious debate over genetic patents: who can have them, who can profit from them, and to what degree scientists can play God, Mother Nature or both– as creator and natural legislator.

DARPA appears to suggest that there could be a way to record change in these organisms — not an easy task for something that’s fundamentally designed to continually adapt.

[Danger Room via PopSci]

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Andrew Nusca

About Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca is editor of SmartPlanet.

Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca

Editor

Andrew Nusca is editor of SmartPlanet and an associate editor for ZDNet. Previously, he worked at Money, Men's Vogue and Popular Mechanics magazines. He holds degrees from the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism and New York University. He based in New York but resides in Philadelphia.

Follow him on Twitter.

Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca
Andrew Nusca does not hold any investments in the companies he covers.
If you liked this, don't miss...
10
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: DARPA seeks to track genetic changes, protect patented genes
The importance of this is apparent. The reason that DARPA is taking the lead rather than some other agency is not.
Posted by hoodedswan
31st Mar 2011
+1 Vote
+ -
Is DARPA doing Monsanto's bidding now?
Genetically altered genes for crops have been patented by monsanto. the problem is that when Monsanto's crops interact with negihboring non-monsanto seeded farms there is gentic carryover. Monsanto then wants to sue those neighboring farms for patent infringement.
Posted by NoSacredCow
31st Mar 2011
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: DARPA seeks to track genetic changes, protect patented genes
A CALL TO PRUDENCE TOWARDS A NOT SO FARFETCHED FUTURISTIC DISASTER THAT WILL DESTROY HUMAN LIBERTY ON THE EARTH

Great danger lurks ominous indeed! No government agency should be allowed to have such great control over genetic knowledge banks without open public oversight by private citizens and voters who are the broadest foundation for the security of individual rights and personal liberty.

In addition, it is not a simple matter of anticipating safeguard provisions for intellectual property rights, a function that is not within the jurisdiction of DARPA, in the first place. DARPA is located within the Department of Defense, which is associated with the Military-Industrial-Complex establishment, evoking "big brother" images of totalitarian fascism in the making, whose despots will end-up having total control over government power, public money, biological reproductive processes, and private technology, all at the same time.

Constitutional protective intellectual property jurisdiction resides within the lawful authority of the Library of Congress Patents, Trademarks and Copyrights Office, and has nothing to do with the military.

The real motives behind this attempted "power grab" by DARPA might not be so explicit - as it had been ruminated that the so-called Genome Project, initiated during the Clinton Administration, was to possibly ferret out how to map human genetic structure in order to "make babies in the laboratory," and by that, make the Woman's Womb "obsolete."

Why would they get rid of the male and female human parents while his sperm and her ovum and her womb are STILL needed?

Though they can't invent the sperm and ovum from scratch, that's one of their mostly prized secret research objectives. Why? Empire-building for world globalism requires "a Sparta mentality" with brainwashed soldiers from the cradle to the grave, which demands so-called "artificial wombs" in order to undermine parental authority and parental rights. The so-called "artificial womb babies" will then "belong" to the government agency or military-industrial complex corporate entity that owns "the artificial womb." However, farfetched and impossible it appears at present, the Antichrist covets the world and will pretend that he can confiscate scientific knowledge from human subjects whom he will then enslave for his own power fetish of global control.

Let us pray that there will be open public hearings with voter participation on this life-and-death matter that touches on ALL our God-given inalienable rights and blessings: all civil, legal, constitutional, religious, scientific, and human rights on the Earth.
Posted by lion of paradise
31st Mar 2011
-1 Votes
+ -
RE: DARPA seeks to track genetic changes, protect patented genes
so, the pentagon is ready to defend the privatization of life processes in order to... what? protect the profits of u.s. corporations? ensure a new mechanism of control over the societies of the world? it's getting really hard to distinguish between the military-industrial complex, big financial capital, and the corporate state. no need to get all chicken-little over this, but there's a distant echo here of what mussolini said about redefining his own contribution to political economy: instead of fascism, it should be called corporatism, because it is a cooperation between the state and the corporations.
Posted by LatAm
31st Mar 2011
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: DARPA seeks to track genetic changes, protect patented genes
Whoever the jackass was at the patent office who first countenanced the patenting of a genome should be charged with a RICO count of conspiracy to commit theft. It is one thing to patent a wholly created process or item. Modifying or even simply codifying a naturally occurring structure should never allow for the grant of a patent! The logical extension of this line of thinking is the claim of agencies, whether commercial or governmental, to ownership of certain human characteristics and prosecuting anyone possessing them without a license. What relief can a court grant, if the person can't or won't pony up? Termination? Don't think for a minute that this could never happen...there are no limits to human (and, by extension, corporate or government) avarice or idiocy pursued under the auspices of the (obviously NOT government-run) patent office.
Posted by decryobliviots
31st Mar 2011
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: DARPA seeks to track genetic changes, protect patented genes
Check the date of the posting, guys.
Posted by mccarr
31st Mar 2011
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: DARPA seeks to track genetic changes, protect patented genes
I dont get it..check date? It isnt April Fool's day yet..huh?
Posted by MontanaMamma
1st Apr 2011
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: DARPA seeks to track genetic changes, protect patented genes
Well it was when I posted that..but still...
Posted by MontanaMamma
1st Apr 2011
+1 Vote
+ -
If it's for real
If not an early April Fool's joke, it's further evidence that the inmates have taken over the asylum. The idea of patenting genes is insane from the start, but this is beyond crazy.
Posted by Greenknight_z
1st Apr 2011
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: DARPA seeks to track genetic changes, protect patented genes
Currently Monsanto has over 11,000 patents on our food supply. One can thank the Supreme Court for the decision to allow a patent in the first place. That opened up the floodgate for other patents. Since then the FDA has worked in concert not to protect "we, the people" but the financial interests of other corporations. Almost forgot, now corporations have the status of a human as per the recent decision of the Supreme Court.

It is interesting to note that one department of the government acts as the police department with enforcement (see Jacqueline and John Stowers story in LaGrange, Ohio, December 1, 2008, among other accounting's - http://waynestrnad.info/#15). This department is the Department of Agriculture.

This article brings to bear the question of how much inner-department sharing of information should be allowed and whether or not probing should be sanctioned and paid for by government - with our tax dollars?

It is one thing to work for the benefit of all people but quite another to use the information in some tangentially hidden agenda. Most of the higher workings will be classified as "national security" or other such cloak, so that people or organizations will be denied access via the Freedom of Information Act. And, one of my favorites when being denied access to information, is "it's overly burdensome" to produce the information. It's as if nobody working in any FOIA office ever heard of an SQL statement.

America, as those of us once new it as the land of the Free, is turning into something that is not Free at all but has a price tag on it, potentially controlled by Corporate and protected by the very leaders(?) we put in office. When you vote make sure you know what you are voting for!
Posted by waynestrnad
1st Apr 2011
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!