Follow this blog:
RSS

DARPA aims to control prosthetic limbs with brain implants

By | March 10, 2010, 6:28 AM PST

As the use of prosthetic limbs increases in military veterans, the Pentagon is investigating prostheses that are more durable, reliable and directly controlled using brain implants.

DARPA, the military’s research arm, said it will launch the next phase of its decade-old Revolutionizing Prosthetics program, which had an original goal to create a fully-functioning, neurally-controlled human limb within five years.

Though the agency has made considerable progress — human trials of the DEKA Arm are underway, and a neurally-controlled arm is under development at Johns Hopkins University — it hasn’t yet achieved its goal.

The hurdles:

  • It has proved difficult to fully integrate human neural pathways with artificial platforms.
  • Neural-recording interfaces have short life spans of just two years.
  • Neural-recording interfaces don’t extract adequate information to yield seamless movement from brain to neurons to limbs.
  • Current prototypes can’t move fast enough: even at 500 events per second, it’s not enough for fluid motion.

To face the challenge, DARPA is launching its Histology for Interface Stability Over Time program.

The goal: create a neurally-controlled limb that lasts for 70 years and has complete integration with the human body.

Here’s what the agency says (.pdf):

DARPA is soliciting innovative research proposals in the area of neural-recording interface failure analysis. The HIST program seeks to develop the technology needed to reliably extract information from the nervous system, and to do so at a scale and rate necessary to control many degree-of-freedom (DOF) machines, such as high-performance prosthetic limbs. Technologies and techniques emerging from this program will enable the construction of reliable neural-recording interfaces, which will be suitable for clinical use over the lifetime of an injured soldier (~70 years). Additionally, an objective understanding of the failure mechanisms will lead to high-throughput biological testing, due to the discovery of predictive markers linked to a high probability of failure and other accelerated-testing techniques. Proposed research should investigate innovative approaches that enable revolutionary advances in science, devices, or systems. Specifically excluded is research that primarily results in evolutionary improvements to the existing state of practice.

In other words: DARPA wants to understand why neural-recording interfaces are so unreliable, and how failure can be predicted before an amputee is left without the use of an artificial limb.

The program is structures in three phases over three years. It’s basically like a hacker contest for prosthetic limbs — DARPA wants researchers to overload neural systems to find vulnerabilities.

Of particular concern are “implanted cortical microelectrodes,” or brain implants, which DARPA believes may be the best system for the job.

Images: U.S. Army; Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory

[via Danger Room]

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Andrew Nusca

About Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca is the editor of SmartPlanet.

Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca

Editor

Andrew Nusca is editor of SmartPlanet and an associate editor for ZDNet. Previously, he worked at Money, Men's Vogue and Popular Mechanics magazines. He holds degrees from the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism and New York University. He based in New York but resides in Philadelphia.

Follow him on Twitter.

Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca
Andrew Nusca does not hold any investments in the companies he covers.
If you liked this, don't miss...
6
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
RE: DARPA aims to control prosthetic limbs with brain implants
One of the main reasons that simple neural sampling as used in
these devices will not work is already quite clear, and stems
from basic anatomy. While the motor cortex, which is being
sampled in these devices, outputs the base movement, this
output does NOT drive the musculature directly, but rather is
routed through the cerebellum, where the actual movement is
fine tuned and coordinated with overall body kinetics. To
acquire smooth, coordinated movement instructions from a
neural sample, cerebellar input must be sampled. ASAICT it
currently is not. This is not surprising, as the cerebellar signal
is highly complex, and deeply encoded.
Posted by DeusExMachina
10th Mar 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: DARPA aims to control prosthetic limbs with brain implants
Seems you need to remember that the ghost shown on Kril photo's exists still if you can find a receptor such as the music box invention of moving your arms threw the air to create a rather haunting tone. you might just get what you want without having the brain surgery. Maybe just maybe your going at this the wrong way. Just an idea
Posted by Erich61@...
10th Mar 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: DARPA aims to control prosthetic limbs with brain implants
Kirilian photos have nothing to do with the present discussion,
and in fact, have nothing to do with much of anything. They are
simply pictures of normal electrical discharge, and have nothing
to do with kinesthetics, brain function, or biology.
Nor, for that matter, does the Theramin, a musical instrument
that creates tones based on the movement of objects in an
electric field. Even if it DID work as you imply, being that it
requires an actual arm or other object moving in the field, how
are you proposing to control THAT arm?
Posted by DeusExMachina
10th Mar 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: DARPA aims to control prosthetic limbs with brain implants
Here's a book I found in my local library that I recommend everybody read: Belfiore, Michael; The Department of Mad Scientists: How DARPA is Remaking Our World, from the Internet to Artificial Limbs, Smithsonian Books, 2009
Posted by AlexKovnat
10th Mar 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: DARPA aims to control prosthetic limbs with brain implants
I'm not sure how solid the cerebellar argument is. There have been studies for disabled people that allowed them to use a computer (slowly over a few months), using only the brain to control it.

I think the main problem they will have is allowing someone to use the device long enough that their brain has time to learn to use the devices and prosthetic replacements. Basically when you are born, your brain has to learn how to use each of the things we take for granted. We learn to use our eyes, ears, and other sensory organs, then we begin to work on our arms and legs. The brain wires itself accordingly throughout this process as it learns.

The main problems I see facing these projects are sensory feedback from the devices. With the computer, the person could just look at the screen and see what they are doing. But with a prosthetic arm for instance, you would need some form of tactile feedback when grasping something, so that you can regulate the pressure, so that the object does not slip from grasp, or end up crushed.
Posted by Liath.WW
10th Mar 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: DARPA aims to control prosthetic limbs with brain implants
It is not an "argument," it is basic neural anatomy. The
experiments to which you refer had nothing to do with the
current discussion. Instead, those subjects were trained to
modify theta wave patterns to control x and y-axis mouse
cursor movement, using simple biofeedback. Modulations in
theta wave output were correlated with up/down, and left/right
cursor control. That's it.
This has nothing to do with neural prosthetic control, which is
done my scanning the motor cortex using implanted cortical
electrodes.

Your second argument is based on flawed understanding or
neural development. Use of basic motor and sensory functions
are NOT learned. IN fact, the data is QUITE clear that these
functions are innate. In fact, it has been shown repeatedly that
acquisition of these functions through anything other than
hard-wiring is mathematically impossible. These functions are
made more precise through learning, but they are not,
themselves, learned.

These are not philosophical issues open to speculation, but
rather known information gleaned from extensive empirical
study.
Posted by DeusExMachina
10th Mar 2010
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!