Follow this blog:
RSS

DARPA: ‘Significant decline’ in U.S. science, tech degrees ‘harming national security’

By | January 20, 2010, 7:57 AM PST

A “significant national decline” in the number of U.S. college graduates with science, technology, engineering and mathematics degrees is “harming our national security,” according to a recent report from the Department of Defense.

According to DARPA, the Pentagon’s research agency, the issue is of “national importance” and “affects our capacity to maintain a technological lead in critical skills and disciplines” on the international stage.

The report (.pdf) cites a pronounced downward trend in computer science degrees and underlines the importance of them in an age of increased adoption of the Internet.

There were 43 percent fewer graduates and 45 percent fewer CS degree enrollments in 2006-2007 than in 2003-2004, according to the Computer Research Association.

The matter is a national security risk waiting to happen, DARPA writes:

In addition, our systems are becoming more complex, requiring more people with the software engineering talent to manage and maintain them. Finding the right people with increasingly specialized talent is becoming more difficult and will continue to add risk to a wide range of DoD systems that include software development.

Why the decline? DARPA concedes that public perception is partly to blame, and a high awareness of the “dot-com bust” and “international outsourcing”  trends have people thinking there are fewer computer science jobs.

But it’s the complete opposite: “Computer Software Engineers, Applications” is the fourth fastest growing occupation in the country in November 2007, according to the U.S. Department of Labor.

DARPA also reports that CS degrees are especially declining for women and minorities. Despite more women than ever achieving STEM degrees, just 22 percent of CS grads in 2004-2005 were women.

To reverse the trend, DARPA is soliciting proposals for initiatives that would attract teens to STEM careers — especially in computer science. The agency won’t offer any suggestions on how to do so — it merely suggests “compelling activities” for middle (grades 7 and 8) and high school (grades 9 through 12) students, with a focus on continuity, national presence and sustainability.

Have an idea? First read the guidelines then submit a proposal through DARPA. Submissions are due March 1, 2010. The prize: $1 million or more in funding.

[via Danger Room]

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Andrew Nusca

About Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca is the editor of SmartPlanet.

Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca

Editor

Andrew Nusca is editor of SmartPlanet and an associate editor for ZDNet. Previously, he worked at Money, Men's Vogue and Popular Mechanics magazines. He holds degrees from the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism and New York University. He based in New York but resides in Philadelphia.

Follow him on Twitter.

Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca
Andrew Nusca does not hold any investments in the companies he covers.
If you liked this, don't miss...
7
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
Well, Duh!
Of course no one wants to go into science.

You say, "gee, I'm a engineer" and the ladies go, "oh" and walk over and talk to the sports jocks or the businessmen.

Science being classified as a "nerd" field is such a bad stigma that no one wants to go into it. They're right, it's about public viewpoint.

Until we stop glamorizing professional sports and business (basically $$$) this will continue. Or, pay our engineers enough to make it an attractive job, which will never happen with places like India and China undercutting us in those fields.

My basic answer to when people defame engineers is, "When was the last time a sports star designed the bridge you drive over to work every day?" Sports stars come and go, the benefits that engineers and science give us last forever. Not that it changes the minds of most of the pre-programmed sheeple.
Posted by Zorched
21st Jan 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: DARPA: 'Significant decline' in U.S. science, tech degrees 'harming national security'
Worked my entire career as an engineer would not do it again, super long hours with no extra pay. You are salary employee 60-80 hour weeks are common. My kid sees this and says Daddy we do other kids parents work 40 hours and live in better homes and have all the toys. I tell those are the lucky few who went into a field that actually pays well.
I train her daily to be an athlete swimming, basketball, and volleyball. I tell her to live her dream I gave up pro sports for Engineering. If you want to work super long hours every week and have a stressful job go into the sciences especially software engineering the job never ends you sleep thinking about work.
Posted by surfnschultz@...
21st Jan 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: DARPA: 'Significant decline' in U.S. science, tech degrees 'harming national security'
What the article didn't say -

The projections are based on an arc between 2008 and 2018.

The actual numbers of jobs are small - for network types, it's less than 300,000 new jobs between now and 2018. There are 4 million people unemployed right now.


Other jobs that are likely to grow in terms of actual numbers - trainer, home health care, etc - with larger numbers but lower percentage changes.

Oh yeah, one other thing - not all engineers go into industry. The guy who publicly decried his lack of a bonus from AIG - Jake DeSantis - look at his linked-in profile,he actiually has a degree in Materials from MIT!
Posted by Bruce L
21st Jan 2010
0 Votes
+ -
Jake DeSantis
@Bruce L

A lot of people get degrees in engineering and don't end up working in the field they studied.
I'm one of the few among my college graduate friends who is working in engineering.

PS: Apparently Jake DeSantis's name is actually Jason De Santis. At least that's how it's spelled in the MIT alumni page.
Posted by tikigawd
21st Jan 2010
0 Votes
+ -
students going to school for degrees
go where they think the job market is going. Any student thinking of IT fields sees daily on IT blogs people complaining about their jobs being offshored. Any student thinking of the sciences sees cutbacks in basic research at the corporate level and cutbacks in public university budgets.

Students who see "technology leaders' and worse, journalists who should know better whining about the lack of interest by students in acquiring degrees which will qualify them to flip burgers with the sole difference between them and their fellow workers being a $100K college debt burden after a handful of top students are cherry-picked by US corporations aren't exactly going to rush to sign up for sci-tech degree programs as a result.

If the US corporate and public sectors are serious about a need for new sci-tech / IT graduates, they can create a program to guarantee professional employment in their degree areas to students graduating in specified fields with an enforceable contract between people who sign up and the organization owning the program.

If DARPA and the Fortune 1000 are not serious about this, they need to STFU and stop wasting our time, and press releases about the "need for new sci-tech students" should go straight into the bit bucket.
Posted by A.Lizard
21st Jan 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: DARPA: 'Significant decline' in U.S. science, tech degrees 'harming national security'
Larry F.
The tech degree shortage starts out in our school systems that spend a disproportionate amount of their budgets on athletics. One can see this from sports arenas and swimming pools that rival colleges. This is rivaled by the numerous long distance sporting trips across states to even numerous out of state competitions.
Disruptive behavior which is tolerated because faculty is afraid of law suits and the ACLU back lashes that allows inappropriate language to clothing. We should look back to the 1950?s and 60?s when a person could make change without a calculator in hand; and discipline with respect was the standard.
Last but not least there has to be a better job opportunity for those who put the investment into education in these fields to have a better bang for their time and effort. The government should panelize those companies who off shore these jobs, as potential students could have a positive attitude in their endeavors.
Posted by Larry F.
23rd Jan 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: DARPA: 'Significant decline' in U.S. science, tech degrees 'harming national security'
A high school student is attracted to a field that appears exciting and that pays well. That does not describe the job of an engineer, or other physical sciences. The news of outsourcing also negatively affects the attraction of these fields.

If this country wants more Computer Science majors, Make it exciting, and make the pay appropriate! Make it more enticing than playing football! Just a little marketing goes a long way!
Posted by cnaw@...
23rd Jan 2010
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!