Follow this blog:
RSS

Could brightening clouds combat global warning?

By | August 20, 2012, 2:42 PM PDT

Researchers have revived the idea of brightening clouds to cool down the Earth.

This type of geoengineering is designed to combat global warming by pumping salt water into the sky over the ocean. Dubbed “marine cloud brightening”, scientists at the University of Washington including Rob Wood have described the experiment in the journal Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society.

By using ships perhaps more suited to a science fiction novel, the vehicles would shoot salt water over the ocean. The water droplets would then form clouds that in theory would reflect more sunlight into space and lower Earth’s temperature.

“It turns out that a greater number of smaller drops has a greater surface area, so it means the clouds reflect a greater amount of light back into space,” Wood said.

Wood believes that with enough interest from the scientific community, funding such an experiment would be possible. A small-scale trial would be the first step to ensure that there are no unwanted, long-term side effects.

Geoengineering uses technology to manipulate our environment. However, experiments including brightening remain controversial. Wood says that this is not a good enough reason to prevent studying the concept — preferring “responsible scientists [to] test the idea than groups that might have a vested interest in proving its success.”

The proposed small-scale experiment would involve deploying sprayers on a ship or barge to trial whether enough particles could be elevated in order to impact the cloud cover. An aircraft would then be used to monitor the physical and chemical characteristics of the particles and how they disperse, and afterwards, a fleet would be used to study cloud development. Finally, five to ten ships would spread out across 100km (62 miles) to track resultant clouds in partnership with satellite technology.

However, Wood acknowledges that any experiments would not a long-term solution to global warming. He said:

“It’s a quick-fix idea when really what we need to do is move toward a low-carbon emission economy, which is turning out to be a long process. I think we ought to know about the possibilities, just in case.”

Image credit: John McNeill

(via The University of Washington)

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Charlie Osborne

About Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne

Contributing Editor

Charlie Osborne is a freelance journalist and graphic designer based in London. In addition to SmartPlanet, she also writes the iGeneration column for business technology website ZDNet. She holds degrees in medical anthropology from the University of Kent.

Follow her on Twitter.

Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what she covers.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
4
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+3 Votes
+ -
Unintended Consequences
This is an idea to be tested, but when working with a complex system as the atmosphere there will be unintended consequences. A possible consequence could be more water in the atmosphere contributing to weird weather patterns. The current National Geographics has an article about extreme weather events from heavy rain lasting days that lead to local floods to stronger thunder storms and tornadoes.

Prudent actions should anticipate problems caused by the solution. A good example is importing cane toads to deal with local insects; the cane toads become a bigger problem than the insects. If making white clouds to combat global warming has a fast effect then it is possible to deal with the severe weather if that is only for a short time. If the solution takes more than a decade to show improvement then it may not be worth the risks from severe weather.
Posted by sboverie
21st Aug
+1 Vote
+ -
It might even make more sense...
...to subsidize intercontinental jet travel. More contrails would probably be more effective at a much higher altitude.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
21st Aug
0 Votes
+ -
Two problems need mention
One, this would do nothing to slow ocean acidification, perhaps the most under-recognized feedback that could produce increasing CO2 levels from the reduced algae growth that more acidic waters contribute to. Two, less sunlight for solar panels, agriculture, as a driver of global winds and other yet to be discovered environmental functions. The concept needs to be studied further since it might prove useful as a short-term way to blunt the effects of extreme heat waves someday, but we should not be deluded into thinking this kind of scheme in any way reduces the need to move to a carbon free energy system globally as quickly as possible.
Posted by John Hartshorn
21st Aug
0 Votes
+ -
If this makes sense
If this makes sense shooting water as snow over either pole would do better.
Consider how much power would need to be used to move enough water high enough to seriously effect the atmosphere. What this idea really needs is a tropical island with a tall mountain where the stack pumps the water up to the top. Then use the tidal changes to power it. Anyone know of an island that would volunteer?
The catamaran looks nice as an illustration but it's too top heavy. The slightest blow would flip it over.
Posted by DS1Roger
22nd Aug
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!