Follow this blog:
RSS

China: for innovation, too big to fail?

By | November 30, 2011, 7:40 AM PST

Much like the difficulties of upgrading aging infrastructure, the United States is falling behind emerging economies such as China and Brazil because its corporate tax code, political gridlock and bureaucratic red tape are too much to bear for the biggest multinational companies.

John Quelch writes at the Harvard Business Review that there’s too much going right in China for it not to surpass the U.S. when it comes to international economic clout, and that American dismissal of the Asian powerhouse as a manufacturer, not innovator, severely underestimates the nation’s ability to do so.

He writes:

From gunpowder on, the history of Chinese innovation is strong. Chinese society is highly competitive. When the Chinese can no longer make easy money imitating, they will start innovating. Home-grown innovations will motivate tougher enforcement of intellectual property regulations.

Within his post, I gathered three reasons China is going to succeed.

Those were:

  1. Education. Chinese parents invest heavily in their children’s education, often because it directly impacts their comfort in old age.
  2. Regional competition. The Chinese understand that owning a brand is much more profitable than simply manufacturing it; major corporations in Japan and South Korea are great targets to compete against.
  3. The new generation. What China is today will not be what it is tomorrow. Millennials are “leading vibrant arts and fashion scenes in the major cities,” building cultural infrastructure that encourages innovation.

The silver lining for the U.S. as far as competition is concerned is that it will take several decades for China’s innovation play to reach maturation. But the writing is on the wall: China has a clear, coordinated strategy, and the U.S. does not.

Get Ready for China’s Innovation Juggernaut [HBR]

Photo: An art gallery exhibition in Shanghai. (Dave Morrow/Flickr)

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Andrew Nusca

About Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca is the editor of SmartPlanet.

Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca

Editor

Andrew Nusca is editor of SmartPlanet and an associate editor for ZDNet. Previously, he worked at Money, Men's Vogue and Popular Mechanics magazines. He holds degrees from the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism and New York University. He based in New York but resides in Philadelphia.

Follow him on Twitter.

Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca
Andrew Nusca does not hold any investments in the companies he covers.
If you liked this, don't miss...
6
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
China Economy is booming
China is giving top priority to Research & Development,Education and Energy. Also if BRIC Nations Brazil,Russia,India and China join hands in economic development then these Nations will be a powerful Block.
Posted by JAnumakonda
30th Nov 2011
+1 Vote
+ -
We've heard this before
"China has a clear, coordinated strategy, and the U.S. does not."

The exact same thing was said regarding the US vs. Japan in the '80s. How did that turn out?

China's explosion has more to do with a large, motivated population and tremendous resources released by economic liberalization than central planning.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
30th Nov 2011
+1 Vote
+ -
China: for innovation, too big to fail?
This guy is talking through his hat. The Chinese is now the flavour of the month.
Posted by premdas67@...
30th Nov 2011
+1 Vote
+ -
Education is Key
Education is key to growth. Chinese parents view education as an investment rather than the view in the US that education is a cost. China does not have the safety nets that the US has and having offspring that can support the elderly is about the only solution.

I remember when literacy rates were part of the criteria to judge nations. It has been said that a literate and knowlegable population is what makes a country strong. It is unfortunate that public schools are seen as a costly entitlement instead of an investment in qualified workers who will have to replace the current work force.
Posted by sboverie
1st Dec 2011
+1 Vote
+ -
Human Rights?
Why does no one talk about the near slavery conditions of the average Chinese worker? This is a current problem, if their pay is mere substance who can applaud the great pyramids Pharaoh built?

Come on, is "political red tape" now code for educated middle class employees in the business world?
Posted by shaunehunter
1st Dec 2011
+1 Vote
+ -
Probably because...
...the awful conditions most now work under are still better than the ones they used to work under.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
2nd Dec 2011
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!