Follow this blog:
RSS

Carbon geosequestration will contaminate water supply, study says

By | November 12, 2010, 8:26 AM PST

To invert the old saying: “What goes down must come up.”

New research indicates that one proposed solution to combat climate change, geosequestration, may come back to bite us in the you-know-what.

Scientists say the suggestion, which involves injecting carbon dioxide deep below the Earth’s surface for storage, will eventually backfire and contaminate our water supply.

Geosequestration is part of a series of new carbon capture and storage technologies under development by governments and industries worldwide — including the U.S. Department of Energy — to reduce the amount of greenhouse gas emissions entering the Earth’s atmosphere.

But according to Duke University researchers, the carbon dioxide will eventually bubble up into drinking water aquifers near the Earth’s surface, driving up levels of contaminants in the water more than 10 times over.

Professors Robert Jackson and Mark Little took core samples from four drinking water aquifers near potential CCS sites, and incubated them for a year in the lab, with CO2 bubbling through them.

At the end of the incubation period, the samples showed greatly elevated contamination levels — in some cases, above the maximum loads set by the EPA for potable water.

They found three key influences on the degree of contamination:

  • Solid-phase metal mobility
  • Carbonate buffering capacity
  • Redox state in the overlying freshwater aquifer

The good news? There are ways to avoid or reduce the risk, they said.

Simply test for the following markers:

  • Changes in carbonate concentration
  • Changes in acidity of the water
  • Changes in concentrations of manganese, iron and calcium

For the last marker, the scientists said that increased levels could be seen within two weeks of exposure to carbon dioxide.

They write:

After exposure to CO2, water pH declines of 1−2 units were apparent in all aquifer samples. CO2 caused concentrations of the alkali and alkaline earths and manganese, cobalt, nickel, and iron to increase by more than 2 orders of magnitude. Potentially dangerous uranium and barium increased throughout the entire experiment in some samples.

Their research was published in the journal Environmental Science & Technology.

Illustration: LeJean Hardin and Jaime Payne/Wikipedia

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Andrew Nusca

About Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca is editor of SmartPlanet.

Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca

Editor

Andrew Nusca is editor of SmartPlanet and an associate editor for ZDNet. Previously, he worked at Money, Men's Vogue and Popular Mechanics magazines. He holds degrees from the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism and New York University. He based in New York but resides in Philadelphia.

Follow him on Twitter.

Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca
Andrew Nusca does not hold any investments in the companies he covers.
If you liked this, don't miss...
19
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Carbon geosequestration will contaminate water supply, study says
Clearly, the only long-term solution is to decrease human population levels. I hereby nominate everybody else's families. My genes are too good to risk losing them from the pool.
Posted by dmm99
12th Nov 2010
0 Votes
+ -
"Clean Coal"?
has always been a joke. When they started talking about pumping CO2 down into oil wells, I nearly choked on my coffee.
WTF is up with these people?
You cannot burn a carbon based fuel and not add carbon loading. The current carbon absorption in the seas is past the equilibrium point, it's bubbling out now. The vegetation can't help.
You saw what happened with the algaeal bloom by iron disposition, right? Turned into another black hole.
The ecosystem is a series of non-linear processes with very sharp differentiation points in the response curves to CO2, water, acid, alkali, metals absorption, and often these break points are not predictable.
What you CAN predict is that continually pushing the stressors in the environment higher WILL start a massive die off at some point.
The entire chain can collapse in a generation. I use the Corals as an example.
Posted by mykmlr@...
12th Nov 2010
0 Votes
+ -
Old news.
Earth injection sequestration of anything other than clean water always contaminates ground water.

Over 20 years ago eco morons tried injecting toxic laden wastewater in Colorado as a SAFE DISPOSAL method. They thought the earth would naturally filter the toxic water.

They contaminated the ground water for miles around the injection well.

Ground injection can be good if used properly. Using wells to draw out contaminated groundwater for filtering and then injecting the clean water back into the ground through other wells outside the contamination zone has been used for decades in Super Fund sites as part of a comprehensive site cleanup.

To think injecting anything would do nothing is just plain stupid.
Posted by Hates Idiots
12th Nov 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Carbon geosequestration will contaminate water supply, study says
I agree with all the above, when I first heard of the idea of putting it under ground I was like oh yes when we get a leak or and earth quake , what then ?
Maybe we should look at sending it to outer space !!! lol
Time we started reducing people breeding I think world wide , so as not to turn our planet into a bigger toilet then it already is .
Posted by dvlmvines
12th Nov 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Carbon geosequestration will contaminate water supply, study says
Sounds like a great idea to me! I presently have to pay for soda water (CO2 infused water) so I can mix a whiskey and soda. The notion that I could make a good drink using "tap water" makes me yearn for the future...I agree with DMM99, except I think we should reduce the population by starting with Al Gore and then work through all of those people who subscribe to these feeble minded theories. Carbon is the basis of life on this planet and every living thing contains it, uses it or releases it in some form or another. Oops, I just farted. Can we sequester that?
Posted by RCBeltz
12th Nov 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Carbon geosequestration will contaminate water supply, study says
It is true that reducing human population levels will happen, since
we are far past the carrying capacity. But in the short run this
amounts to rich white people saying to poor colored people --
stop having kids. While at the same time those same rich white
people (10% worlds population) are using 50% of the worlds
resources, and yes, creating 50% of the CO2 emissions. While
the poor colored people are using very little of the worlds,
resources (ie they are very poor) and as a result of poor
sanitation and inadequate nutrition, their children are dying at
about 100 times the rate of the children of the rich white people.
North Americans use about 300 Gjoules/year/person -- it takes
about 80 for a good life with a reasonable standard of living.
That is we are the big pigs, and our economies depend on growth
just to survive, which means we are working to INCREASE our
share of the world's resources.
Stop buying so much crap, stop eating so much, stop driving so
much, get a more efficient vehicle. Stop telling other people what
they should do until you clean up your own act. IMHO.
Posted by SantaCruzRed
12th Nov 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Carbon geosequestration will contaminate water supply, study says
Storing it underground is complicated and expensive. Just keep it all on the surface.

As trees.
Posted by PassingWind
12th Nov 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Carbon geosequestration will contaminate water supply, study says
SantaCruzRed: You undoubtedly live next door to Nancy Pelosi, right? Rich white people / poor colored people ... we are the big pigs! I guess when you get tired from pedaling your bicycle-generator so you can use your 1st gen Apple computer to post to this site you and I should meet and just hang ourselves. I'm so worn out from polluting this world, taking advantage of all of the poor colored people and generally acting like a big pig that swinging from a noose sounds like a vacation. PLEASE! get real and re-join the human race. By the way, if you're still breathing, you're increasing your carbon footprint... and I only used 230 giga joules last year.
Posted by RCBeltz
12th Nov 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Carbon geosequestration will contaminate water supply, study says
RCBeltz, you are right! Carbon is essential to life, so it is impossible to have too much of it! Just like water - we need it to live. So if your town is flooded under 5 feet of water, it's all good, right?

That was sarcasm, by the way. The idea that since carbon is life-giving, it is impossible to harm the environment by pumping mass quantities into it is the second dumbest "denier" arguement out there. "It's the sun!" is the dumbest.

But in truth, as soon as I saw you invoke the name of Nancy Pelosi into your well-formed argument (sarcasm again) I knew you had no ability to discuss this subject objectively. Partisan blinders destroy the ability to reason.
Posted by Stoshie
12th Nov 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Carbon geosequestration will contaminate water supply, study says
Neither bombast nor verbosity absorb CO2. The Jackson and Little study is too artificial to mean much. People are the problem, especially academics with funds derived from taxes. This test should have been done at a coal fired power plant in an injection well of reasonable depth with groundwater monitoring after a single injection of known magnitude in a location near the homes of the proposers of this dubious sequestering scheme .
Posted by fw32
13th Nov 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Carbon geosequestration will contaminate water supply, study says
SantaCruzRed: That comment has to be one of the most ignorant things I've read in years. Yeah, let's blame it on the white folks, why not? BWAHAHAHAHA!!!
And for the white's "Stop telling other people what they should do"??? Gosh, I haven't been given "white orders" in my whole life, nor have I issued any white orders!
And "colored"? What color would that be? Wait, please don't answer that. Perhaps you should quit while your ahead.....
Posted by Tinman57
13th Nov 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Carbon geosequestration will contaminate water supply, study says
Indeed an interesting debate rages on -- Carbon Sequestration a
slightly different flavor; Algae bio-fuels may provide a better
solution...pun intended. Basic concept -- coupled to municipal
water plants along river systems, you take out contaminated
water nutrient rich run through tanks of algae add CO2
contaminates -- from burning coal say -- then you collect oil to be
processed for all your oil needs and output clean water back into
the river system and O2. Overall net carbon is at worst neutral
but very well could lower through incorporation of carbon into the organism which I'm thinking would be a bi-product which could
then be used as fertilizer in food production.
Posted by ExtremeGeek
15th Nov 2010
0 Votes
+ -
As usual...
...it appears than another progressive solution to an environmental
(non)problem is likely to cause more harm than it cures, and will no
doubt make some crony capitalists rich at the expense of the rest of
us in the process.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
16th Nov 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Carbon geosequestration will contaminate water supply, study says
ExtremeGeek: "You the Man". That's the kind of reasoning that's needed to turn these potential/probable solutions into reality. The resources are all there, we just need to find ways to use them in ways that make sense both economically and environmentally.
Posted by RCBeltz
16th Nov 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Carbon geosequestration will contaminate water supply, study says
Sounds like another trumped up scare tactic by the EPA eco-terrorists. Carbon is a filter! They use carbon impregnated filters to filter air. It REMOVES pollutants, it doesn't enhance them. What a crock of cow dung! I can't believe anyone in their right mind would even finance a study like this. These are the things you learn in 4th grade science class. :P
Posted by xmechanic@...
16th Nov 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Carbon geosequestration will contaminate water supply, study says
xmechanic, Carbon can be used for filtering. Carbon dioxide can not. It is a gas, you know, the bubbles in your beer. These are things you learn in high school chemistry class.
Posted by riverat1
18th Nov 2010
0 Votes
+ -
Then don't pump it into an area with drinking water
There is already a lot of nasty stuff underground. Surely methane, sour gas, oil, coal, tar, uranium, lead, and other metals also contaminate ground water - and they're all natural.

I would imagine there are some areas where it is fine to pump in CO2. Nothing is going to be perfect and humans aren't going anywhere so the best we can do is to try our best. There is no miracle solution or answer. We need to be careful to keep groundwater clean, but we can't be so careful in life that we don't do anything. That would be a disaster too.
Posted by SMparky
26th Nov 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Carbon geosequestration will contaminate water supply, study says
Oh, and for those worried about earthquakes - yes it should be considered, but think about the recent deep water BP oil leak. That oil is sitting in a big pocket. Humans drilled into it and it came gushing out, but a massive earthquake has the potential to cause that kind of a leak naturally. Perhaps if we do it right we can avoid that. The people working on this understand the risks and studies like this just help ensure they do it right (if that's possible when it comes to humans)
Posted by SMparky
26th Nov 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Carbon geosequestration will contaminate water supply, study says
SMparky offers the kind of common sense logic missing from most of the arguments I read on this site. Please keep posting your thoughts as they help to cut through the BS and provide a "distilled" view of the issue in question. RCB
Posted by RCBeltz
23rd Dec 2010
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!