Follow this blog:
RSS

AT&T signs up for 11 fuel cell ‘Bloom Boxes’

By | July 12, 2011, 8:46 AM PDT

Bloom Energy and telecom giant AT&T said Tuesday that the cleantech startup would install its fuel cell-powered Energy Servers — known colloquially as “Bloom Boxes” — at eleven facilities in California.

The AT&T facilities include sites in Corona, Fontana, Hayward, Pasadena, Redwood City, Rialto, San Bernardino, San Diego, San Jose and San Ramon.

The units are expected to provide 7.5 megawatts of energy for AT&T, reducing its carbon emissions footprint for the facilities involved by half, or about 250 million pounds of CO2 per year.

For AT&T, it’s a chance to use a buzzworthy cleantech company in its overall corporate sustainability initiative to use more renewable energy as part of its portfolio. (The company also has 19 solar deployments slated for 2011.)

For Bloom, it’s the latest in a series of high-profile partners, including software maker Adobe.

As we wrote back in January, the key to Bloom’s success lies in its business model, in which it pays for installation and hardware upfront in exchange for profits from a fixed rate on power produced.

(If you’re interested, we did a deeper dive last year into the tech that’s inside the Bloom Box; our corporate siblings at 60 Minutes also profiled the company in February 2010.)

For the AT&T deal, the Bloom Boxes are expected to produce more than 62 million kilowatt-hours of electricity each year, enough to power some 5,600 homes.

Installation of the boxes is scheduled to begin later this year; the plan is to have them fully operational by mid-2012.

Photo: Bloom Boxes at Caltech. (Bloom Energy)

Related on SmartPlanet:

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Andrew Nusca

About Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca is the editor of SmartPlanet.

Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca

Editor

Andrew Nusca is editor of SmartPlanet and an associate editor for ZDNet. Previously, he worked at Money, Men's Vogue and Popular Mechanics magazines. He holds degrees from the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism and New York University. He based in New York but resides in Philadelphia.

Follow him on Twitter.

Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca
Andrew Nusca does not hold any investments in the companies he covers.
If you liked this, don't miss...
8
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
What Happens to the Carbon?
Methane, Ethane, Propane, and Butane are all components of natural/bio gases. They are all hydrocarbons. What happens in Bloom Cells to the carbon? Does it react with oxygen to offgas CO2? Does it collect in a drip pan and send powdered carbon to landfills?

Any explanations of carbon's fate in this process would be greately appreciated.
Posted by RetiredEngineer
12th Jul 2011
0 Votes
+ -
Great question.
Since I'm no engineer, I've asked Bloom Energy for more information on this. When I receive word, I'll post it right here.
Posted by andrew.nusca
12th Jul 2011
0 Votes
+ -
Re: Great Question
Great Answers.
Posted by RetiredEngineer
17th Jul 2011
0 Votes
+ -
It's a SOFC
From the past press it is my understanding that the product is an improved Solid Oxide Fuel Cell, but Bloom is very careful about letting out much specific information. But given that it is basically a SOFC and utilizes hydrocarbon fuels, it cannot be a zero emission system by default. I don't think it is promoted that way, is it? The waste stream includes a lot of water and a "small amount" of carbon dioxide. The water is reused for the fuel cycle (reprocessing). So, it remains to be defined how they handle or sequester the CO2. In early press there was discussion about converting the waste CO2 into a useful hydrocarbon fuel (more methane?), but I suspect that requires someone else's successful invention to be economical and scalable. It will be interesting to see if they reply at all.
Posted by Johno413
12th Jul 2011
0 Votes
+ -
It could be a net zero.
If the input fuel is from bio-sources then the net effect on atmospheric CO2 is zero (ignoring the fossil fuel that went into processing and transporting the bio-fuel) because the carbon was originally drawn from the atmosphere as the bio-sources were grown.
Posted by riverat1
12th Jul 2011
0 Votes
+ -
Recycle effort.
There are people developing processes that can take the carbon left over from various green technologies and convert it into material usable for the production of carbon fiber. Because of the high cost of feedstocks for carbon fiber even expensive capture processes have the potential to break even on costs or turn a modest profit.

With the growing use of carbon fiber composites for weight savings the demand of feedstock should keep growing. This could be a major break through if the capture technologies pan out.
Posted by Hates Idiots
14th Jul 2011
+1 Vote
+ -
cost
The real questions you should be asking are:

How much gas is needed to produce a killowatt of electricty, and how does that compare with gas turbines?

How long will the catalyst last?

How much does it cost to replace it?
Posted by rationalinIL
12th Jul 2011
0 Votes
+ -
thanks for sharing
Great!!! thanks for sharing this information to us!
sesli chat sesli sohbet
Posted by yarinsiz
Updated - 24th Aug 2011
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!