Follow this blog:
RSS

Air pollution bad for your brain, leads to learning problems, depression

By | July 5, 2011, 5:16 AM PDT

Exposure to air pollution over a long period of time can physically change the brain and lead to learning and memory problems as well as depression, according to a study.

The study, led by Ohio State University’s Department of Neuroscience, set out to look at air pollution’s impact on the brain. Most studies have looked at pollution and the effect on the heart and lungs. The study was published in the journal Molecular Psychiatry.

According to an Ohio State statement, the study subjected mice to filtered and polluted air for six hours a day, five days a week for 10 months. That time span equated to half the lifespan for the mice.

The polluted air had fine particulate matter, similar to what cars, factories and natural dust produce. The particulates were 2.5 micrometers in diameter. The particles replicate what a human would be exposed to in polluted urban areas. Once the 10 months of exposure was complete, Ohio State researchers conducted behavioral tests.

For learning and memory, mice were put in a brightly lit area and given two minutes to find an escape hole leading to a dark box. The mice were given 5 days of training to find the escape hole. Pollution exposed mice took longer to learn where the escape hole was located and were less likely to remember the location in later tests.

Additional tests showed that mice exposed to polluted air had more depressive behaviors.

  • Researchers also tested mice brains to see how air pollution affected the brain. Specifically, the hippocampus was examined. Among the findings:
  • Mice exposed to pollution had physical differences in their hippocampi.
  • Pollution exposed mice had fewer dendrite spines—branches growing from nerve cells—than counterparts with regular air.
  • Mice exposed to pollution also had widespread inflammation, which can lead to a bevy of health problems including depression.

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Larry Dignan

About Larry Dignan

Larry Dignan is the editor-in-chief of SmartPlanet.

Larry Dignan

Larry Dignan

Editor-in-Chief

Larry Dignan is editor-in-chief of SmartPlanet and ZDNet. He is also editorial director of TechRepublic. Previously, he was an editor at eWeek, Baseline and CNET News. He has written for WallStreetWeek.com, Inter@ctive Week, New York Times and Financial Planning. He holds degrees from the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism and the University of Delaware. He is based in New York but resides in Pennsylvania.

Follow him on Twitter.

Larry Dignan

Larry Dignan
Larry Dignan does not hold any investments in the companies he covers.
If you liked this, don't miss...
5
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
Technology needs to help
Our brain is the most complex, unknown, and perhaps sensitive part of the human body. The discovery of the neuroplasticity, the ability of the brain to create and develop neurons and connections to decrease the natural cognitive decline and improve the brain capacity, has been breakthrough. It created a new form of training - the brain training programs. When scientifically validated, these programs may change your life for the better. I recommend one that is available online, it is for free: CogniFit. http://www.cognifit.com/
Posted by pmlt8973
5th Jul 2011
0 Votes
+ -
Why do people not care?
So why are people are more concerned with limiting Chinas CO2 output over a theoretical increase in temperature than the increasing amount of lead and mercury dumped into the atmosphere by their growing number of coal power plants? These proven pollutants are causing very real and highly predictable health issues within China and beyond its borders.
Posted by Hates Idiots
5th Jul 2011
0 Votes
+ -
This dealt with particulate matter
In his article Mr. Dignan could have made it more clear that this study only related to air that had ambient fine airborne particulate matter (i.e., particulates 2.5?????m). It didn't have anything to do with the trace contaminants from the burning of coal.

The abstract is at http://www.nature.com/mp/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/mp201176a.html . Once again, we have the case that to get published in prestigious journals, scientists are not allowed to publish in the public domain research which was whole or in part funded by the public's tax dollars.
Posted by zackers
5th Jul 2011
0 Votes
+ -
Not sure on how it is different.
Lead and mercury contamination from burning coal is largely in the form of particulates.

When the contaminates are part of the particulates I do not see how any honest health study could claim the particulates are causing brain damage, but the lead and mercury in the particulates are not causing damage.
Posted by Hates Idiots
Updated - 6th Jul 2011
0 Votes
+ -
thanks for sharing
Great!!! thanks for sharing this information to us!
sesli chat sesli sohbet
Posted by yarinsiz
Updated - 25th Aug 2011
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!