Follow this blog:
RSS

‘Smart city’ tech investment to total $108 billion by 2020

By | September 29, 2011, 8:01 AM PDT

Investment in smart city technology infrastructure will total $108 billion between 2010 and 2020, according to a new research report.

Pike Research predicts that annual spending on these technologies will reach almost $16 billion by 2020, primarily for information and communications infrastructure. The trend will track with a global population boom, expected to reach 8.3 billion people in the next two decades, with five billion in urban areas.

The firm defines a “smart city” as the application of technology for sustainability, citizen well-being, and economic development. Under that broad definition comes technologies such as smart meters, wireless broadband, intelligent transport and virtually anything that combines sensors and monitoring software.

As more of the world’s citizens choose to live in cities instead of rural areas, their portion of global energy use (and greenhouse gas emissions) is expected to rise. “Smart” technologies will help mitigate the trend, Pike says.

“Information and communications — particularly ubiquitous broadband Internet access — are vital elements in any definition of the smart city,” senior analyst Eric Woods said in a statement. “But a city only becomes smart if it can make use of these capabilities to deliver real-time services based on the capture of information.”

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Andrew Nusca

About Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca is the editor of SmartPlanet.

Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca

Editor

Andrew Nusca is editor of SmartPlanet and an associate editor for ZDNet. Previously, he worked at Money, Men's Vogue and Popular Mechanics magazines. He holds degrees from the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism and New York University. He based in New York but resides in Philadelphia.

Follow him on Twitter.

Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca
Andrew Nusca does not hold any investments in the companies he covers.
If you liked this, don't miss...
4
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+1 Vote
+ -
Stop Overpopulation
The most depressing part of this brief story is the part about the world population reaching 8.3 billion within the next 20 years. We can't even sustain a planet with 7 billion people. The next world war may be sooner than we think.
Posted by dcr100@...
29th Sep 2011
+1 Vote
+ -
Man made mess.
Taken as a whole the continent of Africa is the second worst place on the planet to live for lacking water and food, behind Antarctica.

Yet western nations have been pummeled with guilt inducing advertising to support a population boom of incredible proportions in Africa over the past 40 years.

As well intentioned as it was for some people, we have created an unsustainable monster.

Providing aid to Africa is a multi billion dollar industry making a handful of people controlling the flow of aid very rich. Honest efforts to teach sustainable farming to locals are met with violence from people who see the food imports as a means to control the local population.

The hard part is, how do you humanly break the cycle?
Posted by Hates Idiots
30th Sep 2011
+2 Votes
+ -
The cycle breaks itself
History has shown time and again (e.g., America, Europe, and now parts of Asia) that once people become more prosperous they naturally have fewer children.

Africa itself is vastly mismanaged. Countries such as Zimbabwe, which should be net exporters of food, cannot feed their own people. Despite the best intentions of outside aid, the situation will not right itself until Africa can get past its tribalism and join the rest of the modern world.
Posted by zackers
Updated - 30th Sep 2011
+2 Votes
+ -
So far a waste of money
I live in Boulder, CO, a city of 100,000. A few years ago our utility, Xcel, decided to make us the first smart grid city in the nation. They started out by promising to spend $15 million to run fiber to the curb to each residence and business, installing smart meters, and other infrastructure. We were promised that eventually we would be able to monitor each and every use of electricity in our house, and manage it from anywhere.

The end result? The fiber network was installed, as were the smart meters. But the costs ballooned up to $45 million ($450 per resident). Rather than have the residents of Boulder pay for it, Xcel got permission to charge everybody in the state for it. But the network sits largely idle. It's used mainly to read our meters each month, although you can get a near realtime overall measure of your energy use if you want. The problem is a lack of standards and concern over security (you don't want someone hacking into your home over the internet). Those issues still persist today.

Now Boulder has officially withdrawn its support for smart grid. It wants to start its own municipal power utility, and to cut costs it doesn't want the smart grid. If Boulder goes through with its plans, the fiber network will sit idle and Boulder will have to go back to reading meters by sending humans around. The greatest irony is that state residents outside of Boulder will still have to pay for an unused network in Boulder for which the residents won't have to pay because they no longer belong to Xcel. An installed fiber network might make a good internet gateway, but who can afford the $45 million to buy it?

So much for the world of tomorrow...
Posted by zackers
Updated - 30th Sep 2011
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!