Follow this blog:
RSS

The future of manual labor: no people, just robots?

By | August 22, 2012, 3:00 AM PDT

SmartPlanet is all about innovation that impacts your world.

But innovation can sometimes raise uncomfortable prospects. Take, for instance, innovations in robots that will allow them to do many jobs that humans have long been doing in fields such as manufacturing and distribution.

A new wave of highly skilled robots is already starting to replace workers around the world, at cutting-edge companies like electric car maker Tesla and technology leader Apple, as well as at behind-the-scenes actors such as C&S Wholesale Grocers, a major grocery supplier.

These robots are much more adept than the ones of yesteryear and are already starting to replace humans, The New York Times reports in a long feature.

For instance, while Apple manufacturer Foxconn is continuing to build new factories that will employee people, it is also planning to install more than a million robots within the next few years. The company’s chairman, Terry Gou, gave a colorful quote in January to China’s Xinhua news agency: “As human beings are also animals, to manage one million animals gives me a headache.”

What differentiates these robots

New robots not only improve on previous versions but are also so many leaps and bounds beyond in capability that they can replace more than one worker.

Flexibility

New robots in a Tesla factory in Fremont, Calif., outdo previous ones by being able to perform as many as four functions instead of just one. For instance, they may weld, rivet, bond and install a component.

Tesla can also use the same robots to manufacture different cars, simply by reprogramming them. This concept of a flexible robot could be the new direction for manufacturing in robots.

Reliability

New robots outfitted with electronic “eyes” can also be much faster in distribution scenarios. A new robot being developed by Industrial Perception Inc. uses scoops, suction cups — and a technology akin to Microsoft’s Kinect motion sensing system — to pick up boxes and drop them onto conveyor belts with a much lower “injury” rate than, say, the tens of thousands of human workers employed by FedEx and UPS who have all probably suffered from a bad back at least once.

Speed

Industrial Perception projects that its robots will also soon be much, much faster. While average human workers move a box every six seconds (and let’s ignore the fact that they also get tired while moving boxes that can weigh more than 130 pounds), the company projects that the robot will soon move a box every second.

Precision

Some robots can do things that humans simply would find impossible to do: At a Phillips Electronics factory in the Netherlands, a robot can slip wires into holes almost too small to be seen.

And, did we mention that they can work 365 days a year without even a bathroom break?

How they are beginning to replace humans

Many companies are already beginning to use these highly skilled robots.

  • Earthbound Farms in California has robot arms that put organic lettuce into clamshell containers. They are so fast that each robot replaces two to five workers at the company.
  • Boeing uses giant machines to make its wide-body commercial jets, finding them more precise and safer for workers.
  • Royal Philips Electronics, which manufactures electric shavers more complex to make than smartphones, uses robots encased in glass cages on top of which are perched video cameras. Those “eyes” guide the arms as they “bend wires with millimetric accuracy, set toothpick-thin spindles in tiny holes, grab miniature plastic gears and set them in housings, and snap pieces of plastic into place,” according to The Times.
  • At C&S, 168 “rover” robots the size of go-carts race around a warehouse at 25 miles per hour, manipulated wirelessly by a central computer. They can zoom right up to their destination (either a pickup or drop-off spot), grab the item they need and then go to a central chute where all the items are collected. The central computer can pack items in the exact unpacking order they need to be in to go onto the supermarket shelves.

As you can see, with these robots around, there isn’t much need for humans. What do you think? Are these robots a promising development that won’t threaten humans but create new jobs for them? Or are they a threat?

Related on SmartPlanet:

via: The New York Times

photo: Tesla Motors assembly line (jurvetson/Flickr)

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Laura Shin

About Laura Shin

Laura Shin is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Laura Shin

Laura Shin

Contributing Editor

Laura Shin has written for The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, The Los Angeles Times, Audubon and SolveClimate.com. She is currently a senior editor at LearnVest.com. Previously, she worked at Newsweek, the New York Times and Wall Street Journal. She holds degrees from Stanford University and Columbia University's Graduate School of Journalism.

Follow her on Twitter.

Laura Shin

Laura Shin

In the unlikely event that Laura has a professional or financial relationship with a company she writes about, it will be prominently disclosed.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
18
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+1 Vote
+ -
I wish they would develop one that can sew.
My company manufactures a lot of products that requires sewing and we have had lots of problems trying to find people to fill those jobs. I don't see robots replacing people in that kind of a job any time soon. Too many variables.
Posted by rahn@...
Updated - 22nd Aug
-1 Votes
+ -
Too Hard to Read
Your background and font colors have too little contrast for me to take the effort to read.
Posted by EmmettRedd
22nd Aug
0 Votes
+ -
Thanks.
The article is much easier to read now.
Posted by EmmettRedd
22nd Aug
-2 Votes
+ -
robots taking the place of people
In the words of a blogger whose name I'm sorry to have forgotten: industries who count on humans for their customers should hire them.
Posted by jthamilton6@...
22nd Aug
0 Votes
+ -
the human aspect
One Reason robots can out maneuver humans is because their "brains" are so much simpler than a humans. The Robot brains don't need to keep a heart beating or worry about l eyes blinking, let alone deal with emotions. For manual labor this is a big plus.

Let us not forget that someone must manufacture the robots and see to their maintenance and physical health. Sure we could build robots for that but them who -- yes who -- will take care of those robots.

Companies may save money in salaries/union dues/insurance plans - but there will still be need for security and not energy costs. If they can have robots that can work in the dark - I suppose they could cut down energy costs by not using lights.
Posted by llandau@...
22nd Aug
0 Votes
+ -
No money
If we ca earn we cant buy. No job no money. Who will buy this stufff.
Posted by davewsr2
22nd Aug
0 Votes
+ -
In the future.
In the future robots will necessarily become wage earners. They have to be in order to create buyers for the products they make since humans will not have jobs - having been functionally replaced in the future economy. In the future there will surely be be companies that make underwear and tooth brushes for the well paid robot worker/consumers.
Posted by dduggerbiocepts
28th Aug
0 Votes
+ -
Funny what isn't mentioned
I've spent decades figuring out how humans can find a new ecology. This is one of the toughest problems. ... You can replace humans and it is hard to beat efficiency. I think I have a solution. It's going to raise some eyebrows.
Remember though, two of the most brilliant futurists, Issac Asimov and Frank herbert said that we were incompatible with robots.
Posted by a1swdeveloper
22nd Aug
0 Votes
+ -
Incompatible with robots?
I guess it depends on what you mean by 'robot'.

I'm sure they had something in mind other than automated welding machines and self-guided floor sweepers. Most likely it was autonomous, sentient, conscious robots -- basically mechanical people. And they may or may not have been correct. But those kinds of robots are not what we are talking about here.
Posted by Day Dreamer
25th Aug
0 Votes
+ -
New but fewer
New, well paid jobs will be created by robotics, but there will be fewer of them than the jobs that will be eliminated. The motivation is to spend less on robots & labor combined than is spent on labor alone before the (expensive) robots are acquired.
Posted by theotherwill
22nd Aug
0 Votes
+ -
It's true
Not all of the new jobs will be created by robotics. In fact, very few of the new jobs are likely to be associated with robotics. Most of the new jobs will be created by the increased wealth that was created by robotics in areas completely unrelated to robotics.
Posted by Day Dreamer
25th Aug
0 Votes
+ -
GIVE EVERY ONE A ROBOT
We can rent them out for income. Wont work but its a idea.
Posted by davewsr2
22nd Aug
+1 Vote
+ -
The end of drudgery?
The manufacturing sector has mostly migrated offshore to cheap labor locales, but increasing wages in the 3rd world and rising energy and transportation costs are eating away at this strategy. More widespread use of robots will allow much of this work to return to the US where more will be done with less energy. Instead of a large labor force doing menial repetitive jobs a smaller better trained contingent can do more interesting and challenging high-tech maintenance and programming work. More profits, lower costs for consumers and better jobs for those still working. The adjustment for the newly unemployed requires imaginative creation of new work categories, job sharing, etc. Agriculture will steadily produce more with fewer field workers, service jobs will be increasingly automated, etc. The end of dull, repetitive and physically taxing work has long been a distant dream, but now that it's arriving it brings a new set of problems the futurists didn't anticipate. We could certainly use more and better people in human services, nursing, social work, education. The only real problem is allocating resources and planning intelligently for the ongoing transition to a world free of drudge work.
Posted by John Hartshorn
22nd Aug
+2 Votes
+ -
Manual labor is not the purpose of human life
Be sure not to confuse 'doing manual labor' with 'replacing humans' -- they are not the same thing! Society had this same discussion a hundred and fifty years ago when it was the 'machines' that were taking over and were going to put men out of work. Most humans would be (and have been) happy to support themselves by some other means than manual labor -- mental labor and accumulated capital come to mind. When robots take over manual labor, it will just be a different kind of work that is available. But there will be work available. The amount of work to do is infinite because human wants and desires are infinite.
Posted by Day Dreamer
22nd Aug
0 Votes
+ -
robot
it is fascinating to reed this article but what about the human race we have 7billion that need to work what about them.
Posted by josrun
22nd Aug
+2 Votes
+ -
This has been an argument in economics...
...since the invention of the spade plow. Before that, nearly 100% of human endevour was devoted solely to growing food. People displaced by this technology found new things to do, and standards of living steadily grew.

What would the world be like today had we decided that everything that needed to be invented had been invented like many thought 110 years ago? (I doubt you'd be wasting time on a web site like this had that been the case)

Shall we stop now?
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
Updated - 23rd Aug
0 Votes
+ -
Robots
As long as people want products that cost less and are consistently built and of good quality, robots will replace humans in manufacturing. Other jobs are better performed by robots for additional reasons such as human health concerns.

However, there is still a demand for hand crafted products that exceed the quality of mass-produced items built to a price point. Robots cannot make these items efficiently. Robots are not good at making marketing and other human decsions. I seriously doubt that a computer could have decided to create and sell the iPad, but it turned out to be a successful product in the marketplace.

There is a reason why "unskilled labor" has that moniker.

Skilled labor, on the other hand, is in high demand, and U.S. manufacturers cannot find enough people to fill these jobs.
Posted by bb_apptix
4th Sep
0 Votes
+ -
robotics
I hope people realise that when robots takes our formers jobs we will no longer need to purchase goods anymore, we could could eliminate the whole monetary system, we could set up robots to plant seeds to grow our foods and as said above harvest our food for us then it could more than likely even be delivered to our doorstep by another robot. We'd even have robots driving us to our destinations. Robots wil do everythig for us so we can focus on actually living happy lives. People would still be needed to repair the robots and design them,but they'd actually be doing that becase they enjoy it, not because it's a high paying job.
Posted by LiamKF
30th Nov
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!