Follow this blog:
RSS

Quantum dots prove safe in primates

By | May 22, 2012, 3:00 AM PDT

Certain things in science just sound really futuristic. Those terms usually involve the word quantum. Quantum entanglement, quantum computing, quantum physics. Here’s another one: quantum dots. But, like the other fancy sounding terms, quantum dots are real, and quite practical.

What are quantum dots? They’re these tiny luminescent crystals that have all sorts of interesting, and useful properties. They’re semiconductors, and their electronic characteristics change based on how big each crystal is. Since researchers can control to a high degree of specificity how big the crystals are, they can therefore control their electrical properties.

Basically, any time you’re shining a light at something, quantum dots can be useful. Differently sized dots reflect and absorb different lights. They’re a prime candidate for quantum computers, for photovoltaic devices, and for photodetectors. But one of the big areas where quantum dots are promising is in medicine.

Often, doctors or researchers want to dye something in the body to see what’s going on - where the blood or cells are moving, or how much of something is in the body. Normally they use organic dyes, but those often get lost, wear out and aren’t nearly specific enough. Quantum dots, however, can be bright (20 times brighter than the standard fluorescent dies), stable, and long lasting. But there’s still one question: are they safe?

To find out, researchers turned to primates. We already knew they were safe in other lab animals, but that’s not that useful, said coauthor Paras Prasad in the press release. “So far, such toxicity studies have focused only on mice and rats, but humans are very different from mice. More studies using animal models that are closer to humans are necessary,”he said. So, to get closer to humans, they injected four rhesus monkeys with quantum dots made of cadmium-selenite. The monkeys are totally fine for over 90 days after the injection. And, two years later, still no signs of illness. The research was published in Nature Nanotechnology.

Next comes the big test: people. The monkeys did have a build up of cadmium, although it didn’t seem to effect them. It remains to be seen how humans will react.

Via: Newswise

Image: Travis.jennings

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Rose Eveleth

About Rose Eveleth

Rose Eveleth was a contributing editor for SmartPlanet from 2012 to 2013.

Rose Eveleth

Rose Eveleth

Contributing Editor

Rose Eveleth is a freelance writer, producer and designer based in Brooklyn, New York. Her work has appeared in Scientific American, OnEarth, Discover, New York Times, Story Collider and Radiolab. She holds degrees from the University of California, San Diego and New York University.

Follow her on Twitter.

Rose Eveleth

Rose Eveleth

Rose does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what she covers.

she writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
2
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
Cadmium build up????
These monkeys might experience liver and kidney failure
and will be considered hazardous waste when eventually
disposed of. After all, constant exposure is a constant
accumulation. Just the thought of it gives me symptoms
of exposure...wiki it. But considering that a CT scan is
equivalent to 400-500 x-rays, maybe the benefits exceed
the risks when compared to the alternatives?
Posted by bill1514@...
22nd May 2012
0 Votes
+ -
90 days?
Hey, we haven't heard any complaints from the monkey about headaches, or cramps, or kidney or liver pains, it must be good!
Injecting a crystal that doesn't degrade sounds a lot like injecting small glass particles into an animal. Thanks, but given the choice - I will pass.
Posted by james_lucier
22nd May 2012
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!