Follow this blog:
RSS

NASA’s rover, Curiosity, successfully lands on Mars

By | August 6, 2012, 4:33 AM PDT

At 1:32am EDT, NASA’s newest Mars rover, Curiosity, completed one of the most complicated maneuvers in robotic spaceflight to end its almost nine-month trip, successfully landing in the Red Planet’s Gale Crater.

The rover’s next quest? To find out if Mars has ever been hospitable to microbial life. (Read more about its mission here.)

First, it began sending back images of Mars (view the photo gallery here), with its wheels firmly on the rocky surface. (See bottom right in the photo above.) It also began tweeting cheekily about its triumph.

“Today, the wheels of Curiosity have begun to blaze the trail for human footprints on Mars. Curiosity, the most sophisticated rover ever built, is now on the surface of the Red Planet, where it will seek to answer age-old questions about whether life ever existed on Mars — or if the planet can sustain life in the future,” said NASA Administrator Charles Bolden.

“This is an amazing achievement, made possible by a team of scientists and engineers from around the world and led by the extraordinary men and women of NASA and our Jet Propulsion Laboratory. President Obama has laid out a bold vision for sending humans to Mars in the mid-2030’s, and today’s landing marks a significant step toward achieving this goal.”

President Obama also tweeted his congratulations.

A complicated landing and a sweet triumph

The car-sized rover carries 10 science instruments whose total mass is 15 times those of the science instruments on the Mars rovers Spirit and Opportunity.

For that reason, it was too big to land with cushions the way previous Mars landers had done. Instead, Curiosity had to land, the Wall Street Journal reports, “through an innovative—and untested—automated system of high-speed maneuvers, a supersonic parachute, eight retro-rockets, and a set of tethers to lower the robot vehicle the last few feet to the ground.”

The actual landing was the dress rehearsal and the performance all in one.

At pretty much the exact moment of the scheduled touch down, cheers, whoops and applause rang through the control rooms at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena. The control room had heard the electronic “heart-beat” tones relayed from the Curiosity that indicated a successful landing.

Within hours, this victorious image was on the internet:

And the landing was celebrated in other ways:

The landing was validation for NASA, which spent $2.5 billion on the ambitious mission. Curiosity will collect data that will help NASA shape future missions to Mars. Read more about NASA’s mission below, and see photos of the landing in the photo gallery:

via: NASA, The Wall Street Journal

photo: top: NASA/JPL-Caltech; bottom: Upworthy

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Laura Shin

About Laura Shin

Laura Shin is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Laura Shin

Laura Shin

Contributing Editor

Laura Shin has been published in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal and The Los Angeles Times, and is currently a contributor at Forbes. Previously, she worked at Newsweek, the New York Times, Wall Street Journal and LearnVest. She holds degrees from Stanford University and Columbia University's Graduate School of Journalism.

Follow her on Twitter.

Laura Shin

Laura Shin

In the unlikely event that Laura has a professional or financial relationship with a company she writes about, it will be prominently disclosed.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
16
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+2 Votes
+ -
GALE CRATER I AM IN YOU!
I'd hate to be a woman named Gail Crater, right about now.
Posted by boothby171
6th Aug
+3 Votes
+ -
curiousity rover
I am so proud to hear our engineers at NASA made a safe landing on Mars. I hope the mission is a complete success
Posted by wildwolf93446
6th Aug
+2 Votes
+ -
But seriously....
This is amazing news. This landing was a technical difficulty of at least...a 20. And it went off flawlessly (or flawlessly enough!)
Posted by boothby171
6th Aug
+2 Votes
+ -
Curosity
What a tremendous feat!! Congratulations NASA
Posted by jjw9
6th Aug
-1 Votes
+ -
CURIOSITY SAFE LANDING ON MARS
CONGRATULATIONS .ANOTHER GREAT SUCCESS BY NASA.WE WILL SEE SOMETHING NEW EXPLORATION THROUGH CURIOSITY ROVER AT OUR PLANET. NASA 'S engineers made a safe landing on MarsThe car-sized rover carries 10 science instruments whose total mass is 15 times those of the science instruments on the Mars rovers Spirit and Opportunity.This is an amazing achievement, made possible by a team of scientists and engineers from around the world and led by the extraordinary men and women of NASA and our Jet Propulsion Laboratory. President Obama has laid out a bold vision for sending humans to Mars in the mid-2030s, and todays landing marks a significant step toward achieving this goal.(AS MENTIONED IN NEWS) - BY RKS
Posted by rajesh surana
6th Aug
-1 Votes
+ -
Bum!
JJW9, Obama is a liar and a BUMB!!
Posted by Rovanton
6th Aug
+1 Vote
+ -
what?
Are you talking about the same President Obama who defunded and ended NASA? The current Mars Rover mission is the last one we will have at least until he is out of office. The President has NO vision for NASA or space or Mars for the forseeable future, much less 15 years from now!
Posted by cliffmeixner@...
8th Aug
+2 Votes
+ -
An Olympian achievement
Congratulations to NASA & the contractors. I for 1, celebrate our robotic explorers.
Posted by theotherwill
6th Aug
0 Votes
+ -
Obama NO Bama
I congatulate everyone who was conected with the sucess of this program and they certainly should celebrate. Obama had very little if anything to do with this milestone. I don't believe a socialist should be given credit.
Posted by Rovanton
6th Aug
-3 Votes
+ -
Congrads but at what cost
Sincerely, this is a remarkable accomplishment and Congratulations to all.

Come on, $2.5 Billion Dollars to explore a planet 8 months away from earth.
I believe the money would be well spent advancing technology to protect our own natural resources and life here on earth vs. looking for life elsewhere.
For the first time in history did anyone notice that Greenlands Ice cap is gone; we should have sent the rover there to look for life.
Wont be long before we can get the same dust bowl photos here on earth.
Posted by kbartleson
6th Aug
0 Votes
+ -
Greenland's ice cap is not "gone".
Read the articles instead of just the headlines.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
6th Aug
-1 Votes
+ -
Yes it is.
Do a search on Smart planet. type in "Blink, its gone: Greenlands surface ice melted two weeks ago"
Posted by kbartleson
7th Aug
0 Votes
+ -
Clearly, you didn't actually read the article...
...which will tell you that this happens roughly every 150 years, and then the ice comes back.

NASA glaciologist Lora Koenig notes that Greenland experiences such melting events, About once every 150 years on average. With the last one happening in 1889, this event is right on time.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
Updated - 7th Aug
0 Votes
+ -
Saying the cycle in 150 years is misleading.
John, you are right and kbartleson is wrong in that it was only the surface layer of an ice sheet over 2 km thick that melted. But saying the cycle of these melts is 150 years is kind of misleading. The gap between the 1889 event and the one prior to it was 700 years. These surface melt events were concentrated in the first half of the Holocene and have been relatively rare during the last 1000 years. This graph:

http://www.gisp2.sr.unh.edu/DATA/alley1.html

shows there have been only 6 events in the last 2000 years, an average of every 300 years and 3 of the events were concentrated during the MWP. The frequency of the events in the early Holocene is probably due to orbital variations that don't exist today.
Posted by riverat1
Updated - 8th Aug
0 Votes
+ -
I didn't come up with the 150 year figure...
...but the fact remains that it is an observed cycle. At some point it melts, and at some point it accumulates.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
Updated - 8th Aug
0 Votes
+ -
I know ...
that you didn't come up with the 150 year figure but repeating it is still misleading. Did you check out the graph I cited? Notice that the Greenland surface melt events are concentrated in the period from 4,000 to 8,000 years ago and particularly from 6,000 to 8,000 years ago. Also not in the graph below the main one how much higher July insolation was back then.
Posted by riverat1
8th Aug
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!