Follow this blog:
RSS

Infographic: Most startups fail because of premature scaling

By | September 1, 2011, 11:53 PM PDT

While most entrepreneurs dream of growing their startups into a beast like Facebook, most never reach global domination, get Hollywood treatment, and become worth billions of dollars like the social network. Statistically speaking though, successful startups are a rare breed.

One out of every ten startups do fail, eventually.

Bjoern Herrmann wants to crack the code of innovation. To discover what makes up the DNA of successful companies, he needs to understand why they fail. Herrmann co-founded The Startup Genome Report to survey 3,200 startups, a research initiative that used machine learning to identify the startup’s type and stage.

It turns out, many companies that fail suffer from premature scaling. Don’t blame age, location, experience, or education - none of those factors affect a company’s chance of heading down the path of failure.

“[Premature scaling] helped us to explain about 74% of failures,” he said to me. That might explain why so many startups do fail.

So what exactly is premature scaling? It occurs when one side of the business scales before other parts. This can happen when a startup hires too many people or messes up customer acquisition strategies. For instance, a startup that hires 40 people before they have customers is, well, tempting fate.

Startups are temporary organizations that are designed to evolve into large companies, Herrmann said. They have six stages: discovery, validation, efficiency, scale, sustain and conservation.

But most get lost along the way.

The team behind The Startup Genome also created a business accelerator called Blackbox, to use the data they find. The team added a tool, so entrepreneurs can track their own growth and use it to compare with other companies in the system.

Thinking about failure all the time must be nerve racking: Is Herrmann worried about his own startup failing? “I’ll do my best to reduce risk and increase certainty,” he said.

Cracking the code for failure, isn’t as flashy as innovation, but at least, it can help entrepreneurs avoid repeating the same (premature) mistakes.


Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Boonsri Dickinson

About Boonsri Dickinson

Boonsri Dickinson was a contributing editor for SmartPlanet from 2010 to 2012.

Boonsri Dickinson

Boonsri Dickinson

Contributing Editor

Boonsri Dickinson is a freelance journalist based in San Francisco. She has written for Discover, The Huffington Post, Forbes, Nature Biotech, Technewsdaily.com, Techstartups.com and AOL. She's currently a reporter for Business Insider. She holds degrees from the University of Florida and the University of Colorado at Boulder.

Follow her on Twitter.

Boonsri Dickinson

Boonsri Dickinson

In the unlikely event that Boonsri has a professional or financial relationship with a company she writes about, it will be prominently disclosed.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
3
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
-1 Votes
+ -
Social Network & Create Business Listing For Free
Global Social Networking, Privacy, Anonymity, No Facial Recognition Software & Data Mining, Business & Personal Profiles, Business Listings, Classifieds, Groups, Blogs, and much more...Absolutely Free! Facebook, Google+, Twitter, and Linkedin new alternative ONLYMEWORLD.
Posted by onlymeworld
2nd Sep 2011
+1 Vote
+ -
10% of startups fail???
Not sure where you got your startup data or what it included - maybe only tech startups? I suspect the failure rate is much, much higher. For example the first year failure rate of new restaurants is over 50%. I'm guessing there are a lot more restaurant startups each year than tech ventures. It sounds like the data used was more like gov. employment statistics that don't account for people underemployed or out of the unemployment application very short term tracking system - which is very significant. Actual US unemployment rates are estimated to be 20%+ - which makes them higher than the other Great Depression in the 30's - based on soup line data.
Posted by dduggerbiocepts
2nd Sep 2011
+1 Vote
+ -
dduggerbicepts, are you on something?
wow ddugg; way to get off the context of the article, do you even know what you are talking about ddugg?
Posted by thegreenflamingo
Updated - 5th Sep 2011
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!