Follow this blog:
RSS

Hurricane forecasts can be made a decade in advance

By | November 8, 2010, 1:05 PM PST

The destructive path of a hurricane might get a little more predictable, according to Met Office Hadley Centre scientists, who claim it’s possible to predict the number of hurricanes years in advance.

By using a computer model called Decadal Climate Prediction System (DePreSys), scientists predicted how many storms occurred during past hurricane seasons. Met Office’s Doug Smith ran the computer model using ocean temperature, air pressure and wind speeds, according to New Scientist:

  • First, Smith looked at the hurricane seasons from 1960 to 2007 to predict the number of storms that occurred each year.
  • Nine different models were run and then Smith took the average to get the most accurate computer model.
  • Using the model, the researchers made 10-year predictions from the years 1960 to 2005.
  • The first few years were the most accurate.
  • The computer model predicted the number of storms within 19 percent of the historical number. Not bad.

Being able to predict hurricane patterns years in advance will not only transform scientific knowledge of the destructive beasts, it will likely change how the insurance industry looks at risk and could help hard hit hurricane regions prepare better for the storm.

The study was published in Nature Geoscience.

Hurricane activity has been more active in the past 15 years. There’s been an uptick in the frequency of Atlantic storms — but you can’t just blame the fluctuations in ocean temperature, the scientists concluded. However, the scientists still can’t gauge how other factors like solar activity or greenhouse gases might play a role.

Predicting the number of hurricanes is one thing. But it will be more difficult to actually predict how destructive the hurricanes will be. Even so, this is the first time anyone has tried to predict the number of hurricanes beyond the immediate hurricane season.

On that note, Smith is ready to use his hindcast skills to forecast future hurricane seasons.

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Boonsri Dickinson

About Boonsri Dickinson

Boonsri Dickinson was a contributing editor for SmartPlanet from 2010 to 2012.

Boonsri Dickinson

Boonsri Dickinson

Contributing Editor, Science

Boonsri Dickinson is a freelance journalist based in San Francisco. She has written for Discover, The Huffington Post, Forbes, Nature Biotech, Technewsdaily.com, Techstartups.com and AOL. She's currently a reporter for Business Insider. She holds degrees from the University of Florida and the University of Colorado at Boulder.

Follow her on Twitter.

Boonsri Dickinson

Boonsri Dickinson

In the unlikely event that Boonsri has a professional or financial relationship with a company she writes about, it will be prominently disclosed.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
8
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Hurricane forecasts can be made a decade in advance
The destructiveness of hurricanes largely depends on whether they make landfall or not which is not something that is being predicted here. 2010 has been a very active Atlantic Hurricane Season but the perception for most Americans is that it wasn't much because there have been no big headline producing landfalls in the US other than the southern tip of Texas.
Posted by riverat1
8th Nov 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Hurricane forecasts can be made a decade in advance
My guess is that it's all guesswork, I guess.
Posted by ITOdeed
9th Nov 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Hurricane forecasts can be made a decade in advance
1960-2005? These are postdictions. I can do that without a computer.

What are his predictions for 2011 - 2050?
Posted by pbevilaqua
9th Nov 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Hurricane forecasts can be made a decade in advance
I do believe, that, with, what, 3 trillion dollars worth of satellites, here in the NW, they can't even predict the correct weather even 80 percent of the time. My, my. Are we looking for more money to do our crisis research?LOL
Posted by Solution1
9th Nov 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Hurricane forecasts can be made a decade in advance
I think he could use the same system for lotteries and tell us how much we could have won. BUt the future will be more difficult
Posted by Dant1
9th Nov 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Hurricane forecasts can be made a decade in advance
"it will likely change how the insurance industry looks at risk"

I can see it now, right before a hurricane is predicted to make landfall, the insurance companies can refuse new customers in the effected area, and cancel insurance on their current customers in the affected area.

You can just about figure that if the insurance companies are interested, then it's not going to be good for the consumers...
Posted by Tinman57
9th Nov 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Hurricane forecasts can be made a decade in advance
Folks are beginnning to confuse the difference between climatology and meteorology. The former has a higher degree of confidence precisely because it does NOT predict individual storms, rather it looks at trends, such as whether the global or even regional temperatures will be going up in the coming decades, or whether the number of hurricanes are predicted to go up or down. This can be done with greater and greater accuracy, but it is quite different from the latter, meteorology, i.e. predicting where an individual storm will develop, what direction it will take, and whether it will make landfall. Meteorological models are improving, but those predictions cannot be done very far out in advance with a very high degree of confidence

Think of the two as the difference between trying to predict the course of a giant ocean liner crossing the Atlantic vs. trying to predict the course of a kayak on a whitewater stream. The ocean liner's trajectory and dynamics are much easier to be predicted further out in time vs. the trajectory of that kayak..
Posted by klassman6
10th Nov 2010
0 Votes
+ -
Poppycock, That Prediction is not Absolute even with the Quantified Spread
This statistical model may not be as accurate than someone living
in those areas that is aware of the number of storms that have
occurred and simply guessing given the spread. The degree of
accuracy gets more generous all the time so when the actual
number falls in between then they consider their guesses a
success. Don't confuse prediction with accuracy much less
absolute precision. What was the pattern predicted other than
suggesting a possible number of storms that may become
hurricanes? How about the Pacific as well?
Beside the inherent system bias due the calibration of that past
data what use is it without regard to the current physical
conditions contributing to timely analysis that determines actual
formation or even suggesting the storms track? Sure it may
complement the weather service monitoring but that is already in
effect; this was merely a data sifting exercise with an attempt to
determine the future by calibrating it to the past.
Besides the residents should know that they are at risk from
natural hazards yet they still reside in harms way. If the planning
and preparations aren't in effect by now along with teaching their
children about such matters then well then they are some very
clueless people. Then again, people in Chicago seem to be
surprised that it snows every winter and go through the same
issues so go figure.
You do realize that hurricane formation is absolutely dependent
upon ocean temperatures, suggest that you understand the
mechanisms of warm core tropical cyclones.
Dynamic variability from estra-terrestrial forces and terrestrial
factors will hinder decadal prediction with statistical models
unusable and unreliable, nothing more than trying to sift through
the past data that was gathered to determine some pattern but
it's still very messy. That 19% needs critical evaluation even
though it was based on already recorded data. Consider that this
season was to be characterized as a rather harsh La Nina
(whatever that means these days), although that was always a
dubious matter anyway along with the supposed opposite
condition of ENSO has become a distortion by climatologists as
well as the mass media, but the conditions have been far from the
case. Meant to characterize ocean surface temp off the west
ccoast of Ecuador during December but now people try to extend
it to many months longer and even to suggest global connections
without recognizing the many other forces and factors possible in
the dynamic variability of our temporal weather patterns as well
as climate patterns. Although I hear them keep saying wait and
see, wait and see ... aah, the hubris of expertology. You will
never be ahead of it; even all the models show great disparity
and disagreement. Keep on studying but please remain reserved
and in your places until something plausible can be determined
that you can stand by with absolute certainty. I'm know that I'm
harsh but not without meaning, compassion, equality, and good
intentions.
Posted by donnydo77@...
22nd Feb 2011
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!