Follow this blog:
RSS

How engineering malaria-resistant mosquitoes could save millions of lives

By | July 16, 2010, 11:02 AM PDT

Michael Riehle is holding a container full of mosquitoes. But he doesn’t necessarily want the insects to die. He wants them to live long enough, so he can open up their guts and count the number of parasites they have.

Gross? Well, yes. But it’s also a discovery that could wage a war against malaria through the use of genetically engineered mosquitoes. In recent experiments, a University of Arizona entomologist Riehle isn’t finding any parasites in the mosquitoes designed to be resistant to malaria.

Eliminating human malaria from a mosquito was exactly what Riehle, had been trying to achieve for the last three years.

Riehle put a gene in a mosquito to over-express a gene that was already there, which converted the gene into an active state.

The mosquito’s gene, Akt, is involved in a number of processes, including lifespan, digestion, and reproduction. Therefore, it takes 3 to 4 months to create a genetically engineered mosquito that is completely immune to the parasite that causes malaria.

“I think it’s a pretty big step forward. We’ve completely blocked the development of the human malaria parasite in the mosquito. Previous research has not completely blocked it,” says Riehle.

The other groups achieved up to 97 percent, but 100 percent is essential if the goal is to control it on the field.

When a mosquito transmits malaria, it injects about 40 sporozoites from its gut. From there, the parasite makes its way to the mosquito’s salivary glands, where it can infect an unsuspecting person. Unfortunately, it only takes one parasite to cause malaria.

“Even if a single parasite survives to form a oocyst, then the mosquito will be able to transmit malaria. If the parasite can avoid the killing mechanism, resistance will develop and the mosquito will no longer be effective,’ Riehle says.

Riehle’s experiment looked at two types of mosquitoes — one was a control (or the wild type) and the other one was a transgenic breed. After the insects are feed infected blood meal, the mosquitoes are left to develop for 8 to 10 days. That’s when the researchers dissected the guts and counted the number of parasites.

“We saw nice infections in the control and not a single parasite in the genetically engineered ones,” Riehle says.

“This work is really exciting because the authors completely eliminated malaria infection by over-expressing just a single gene in the mosquito,” University of Notre Dame malaria postdoctoral researcher Bradley White says. “Moreover, the same transgenic mosquitoes had shorter life spans, which could also yield decreases in malaria transmission since only relatively old mosquitoes transmit the parasite.”

Riehle knows that, admitting “the biggest hurdle is to drive them into the wild population. They have a shorter lifespan, so they wouldn’t compete [with the others]. Even if you released a few million mosquitoes, they would be out competed by the wild mosquitoes and just disappear.”

That’s not the only hurdle.

The mosquito species studied, Anopheles stephensi, is a major vector of malaria in parts of Asia, but it is not one of the major vectors in Africa where the vast majority of the world’s malaria-related deaths occur. “Unfortunately, the major African vectors remain unnameable to transgenesis — the technique used in this study — although research in overcoming this obstacle is ongoing in many labs,” White says.

However, Riehle thinks the method should work in the main African vector. “They will be able to reproduce with the wild mosquitoes. They won’t produce as many eggs, but that can be overcome by giving them a competitive fix,” he says.

Until designer mosquitoes are unleashed into the wild, there’s always insecticide-laced nets that can do the job.

But then again, not everyone is even using them in Africa.

“Insecticide-treated bed nets, or drugs to cure the malaria are effective ways [to prevent malaria], except resistance is developing against the parasites,” Riehle says.

Give the genetically engineered mosquitoes 10 years to emerge as a viable solution to the fight against malaria. This will only happen if the mosquitoes can compete with the disease-ridden wild ones.

Still, there’s a lot more work to be done in the lab before these mosquitoes are fit enough to infiltrate the wild population. “At this point, we don’t know the exact mechanism of how the parasites are being killed,” Riehle says.

Photo credit: University Communications (top) and M. Riehle (bottom)

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Boonsri Dickinson

About Boonsri Dickinson

Boonsri Dickinson was a contributing editor for SmartPlanet from 2010 to 2012.

Boonsri Dickinson

Boonsri Dickinson

Contributing Editor, Science

Boonsri Dickinson is a freelance journalist based in San Francisco. She has written for Discover, The Huffington Post, Forbes, Nature Biotech, Technewsdaily.com, Techstartups.com and AOL. She's currently a reporter for Business Insider. She holds degrees from the University of Florida and the University of Colorado at Boulder.

Follow her on Twitter.

Boonsri Dickinson

Boonsri Dickinson

In the unlikely event that Boonsri has a professional or financial relationship with a company she writes about, it will be prominently disclosed.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
16
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
RE: How engineering malaria-resistant mosquitoes could save millions of lives
if we were able to achieve the goal of this worker, would we not, by eliminating a whole species by substituting another in its place, take the chance that this would change the balance in nature with some effects not sought for?.
there are objections to the tinkering with plant species and there should be the same for this more major type of change, the elimination of a complete species of any kind, even though we do not like what the species does in the natural world.
welcome to the world of unintended consequences!!!
Posted by stilt21
16th Jul 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: How engineering malaria-resistant mosquitoes could save millions of lives
I hope this works, it will save millions of lives. Hopefully, it will not cost a fortune, either.
Posted by Gilgamesh2
16th Jul 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: How engineering malaria-resistant mosquitoes could save millions of lives
This could be a huge breakthrough for the people of the
developing world. I think that most people don't realize that
Malaria still is the most deadly disease in the world killing
1,000,000 a year. It is a little scary to think that we could
possibly genetically engineer a wild population through breeding.
I feel like this is a slippery slope and we need to be careful.
Scientists in the past have done ok with fighting malaria but
recently have made a huge breakthrough. They have effectively
created a cure for Malaria called Artesinate. It is scheduled for
FDA approval and could change the game for people inflicted
with this horrible disease. I'll post a link to a video all about this
new cure. It's truly amazing!

http://www.ndep.us/Fighting-Malaria
Posted by sanud002
19th Jul 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: How engineering malaria-resistant mosquitoes could save millions of lives
I'm so happy that we spent tax payer money on this before first answering the question "How do you replace the world's mosquito population with the engineered mosquitos."

Every scientist should be required to write "Put the horse before the cart" ten-thousand times on a chalk board before being awarded grant money.
Posted by keitha73
19th Jul 2010
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: How engineering malaria-resistant mosquitoes could save millions of lives
Sounds great. But how will all these saved people be fed?
Posted by tomsmart
19th Jul 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: How engineering malaria-resistant mosquitoes could save millions of lives
@sanud002

Great link. Thanks.
Posted by ITOdeed
19th Jul 2010
-1 Votes
+ -
The old-fashioned way
"Sounds great. But how will all these saved people be fed?"

These saved people will feed themselves. They will do it in the same way people did it for millennia, before the liberals convinced them that it was acceptable to be part of a dependent class.
Posted by TranMan
19th Jul 2010
-1 Votes
+ -
RE: How engineering malaria-resistant mosquitoes could save millions of lives
how do the saved people get fed?
by overthrowing the economies that keep them starving.
how do the disease free mosquitos take over?
by being seeded in in large numbers, and using ddt in large amounts in other areas.
then induce the rule of 9s.
u can;t put the horse before the cart until you know there is a cart.
Posted by gabriel bear
19th Jul 2010
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: How engineering malaria-resistant mosquitoes could save millions of lives
yeah save millions of lives.

Why didn't Noah swat those two mosquitoes on the ark?
Posted by sparky2dog
19th Jul 2010
+1 Vote
+ -
Don't!
Harsh as this may seem, saving millions from the mosquitos will
only make them starve to death. Which is better?

They can not feed them selves "the old fashioned way" because
most of them live in the third world, where there is very little
suitable soil to grow food in, as tv-news has pointed out again
and again.

How long will it still take before the human race realizes that we
are already about 4 billions TOO MANY. The earth can not
sustain such a lot of humans.
Posted by Dukhalion
20th Jul 2010
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: How engineering malaria-resistant mosquitoes could save millions of lives
@TranMan

"Sounds great. But how will all these saved people be fed?"

"These saved people will feed themselves. They will do it in the same way people did it for millennia, before the liberals convinced them that it was acceptable to be part of a dependent class."

Thes people are not the Americans who have been conned by the Liberal movement into be dependents of the state but peopls of poor third world countires where they do know how to farm they just dont; have the resources (i.e. seeds & other neccessities for farming) nor often the land & water to do so and so they starve or die from disease.
Posted by BlueCollarCritic
20th Jul 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: How engineering malaria-resistant mosquitoes could save millions of lives
QUESTION: How do you prevent a teenager who is prone to driving to fast and had a high risk of causing wrekcs and therefore hram to thers from speeding?

Genetic Scientist Says: We'll genetically modify people to be resistant to injuries from car wrecks.

Common Sense Man with Wisdom asks: "So we don't work on preventing teh problem but instead find a way to work-a-round it?"
Posted by BlueCollarCritic
20th Jul 2010
0 Votes
+ -
Science Too Often Does Not Look before it Leaps
There just may be a reason that Mother Nature made mosquitoes blood suckers and therby possible carriers of malaria. I'm not saying fighting malaria is a bad thing, only that we have to ask if this is the right way to do it.

The excess banning of hunting in many areas of the Country, intended to presereve animal species, has now lead to an excess of attacks on people by animals like bobcats.

I'm just saying sometimes the scientist don't seem to look before they leap and so they end up producing a bigger problem to deal with then the one they solved.

Scientific inovation should never be discouraged, simply tempered with patience and wisdom. Just because you can that doesn't mean you should.
Posted by BlueCollarCritic
20th Jul 2010
0 Votes
+ -
Starvation is related to Strife
Many of the third world countries have plenty of fertile land, but
because of strife and conflict. Genetic engineering, like many other
engineering fields appears to me to be fairly linear in its problem-
solving. Need to get rid of malaria? Create a mosquito species that is
resistant to malaria. What if you make a mistake? What if the created
species turns out to be too prolific and creates the perfect vector for
some new, previously unknown disease? Distributing mosquito nets
seems like the better bet. You may not eliminate the disease, but you
can reduce it's prevalence to much lower levels.

As for the view that we should not tinker with this devastating population
control...

A) it isn't just that Malaria kills, it also disables people making it hard for
them to work enough to feed their families.
B) would you make the same argument if people in your own town were
dying from a similar disease? There is no "surplus population" that
needs "decreasing" (to paraphrase Dickens).

There is more than enough food to go around, just a lack of
infrastructure. Infrastructure destroyed by villains whose weapons
come from wealthy countries. Infrastructure lacking due to corrupt
politicians in the pocket of powerful, often rich-country-based,
extraction industries. Poverty and starvation are caused by the greedy
and power-hungry and sustained by the willful ignorance of those who
are too comfortable to care.
Posted by technology@...
21st Jul 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: How engineering malaria-resistant mosquitoes could save millions of lives
But wouldn't this genetically engineered mosquito. Still be able to transfer tainted blood( HIV positive), from one person to another??
Posted by blackjack861@...
23rd Jul 2010
0 Votes
+ -
Stop The suffering of children. A two pronged aproach
Stop bringing children into the world to suffer because of the selfish decisions of the parents.

BRINGING CHILDREN INTO THIS WORLD IS NOT A RIGHT. iT IS AN ENORMOUS RESPONSIBILITY.

CHOiCES IMPLY RESPONSIBILITY FOR THOSE CHOICES

Spend the resources for reducing the human furtility. As well as killing the Malaria desease, and therefore reducing suffering.
Posted by TonyTrenton
Updated - 23rd Jul
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!