Follow this blog:
RSS

Graphene, Graphene, Graphene. Read all about it.

By | July 7, 2010, 10:37 AM PDT

Graphene could one day replace silicon and improve electronics, displays, and automobiles.

There are so many research papers coming about about graphene, even the experts have a hard time keeping up. Its electronic and optical properties, chemical, thermal, and mechanical properties have garnered serious attention from academics and industry professionals alike.

After British researchers discovered graphene in 2004, and since then, other researchers have made nanometer sized transistors. Manipulating the properties of this material proved to be popular in the lab, but no one can really mass produce it

Paul Sheehan, head of nanoscience and sensors section at the Office of Naval Research, might be able to change that.

Sheehan has been using a heated tip of an atomic force microscope to change the electronic properties of graphene from insulating to a conducting material — so it can be used to one day make circuits. So far, the technique works on different forms of graphene.

If Sheehan manipulates graphene as he wishes, it’s not far-fetched to think circuits could be programmed so each wafer could be custom-made. Any changes to the process could be easily programmed in the factory to suit particular needs.

What’s the buzz about?

People have known since the 70’s about monolayer graphite. There was no way to test its electronic properties.

This changed in 2004, when researchers discovered how to isolate graphene on an insulator.

This allowed us to test its conductive properties. You can’t test a single layer of graphene when it’s on metal. You have to be able to test electronic properties so you can make things.

Many people have different interests in graphene. Some want to exploit the mechanical properties, but most are interested in the electronic properties. One of the main interests is to generate graphene nanoribbons. Semiconductors have band gaps. So if you slice up graphene into ribbons, it has band gaps.

What are you working on?

Our immediate focus is figuring out how to pattern it. We’ve done it in a way to generate a whole wafer at a time. The benefit is a one step process.

We use these heated tips as nanoscale soldering irons. Our other effort is to make the tips indestructible. Recently, we’ve been coating it with diamond.

So will graphene replace silicon?

Graphene has the potential to do it, but it is a ways out.

Why focus on graphene?

You can change its properties just by changing its shape. If you make it into a nanoribbon, you can give it a band gap. If you make it into a bow tie, it becomes magnetic. You can generate a flip-flop circuit by changing the shape of the graphene.

So it’s like playing with Legos.

It’s strong and easy to make. The chemistry allows you to make many things with it.

This is the first few years of playing with the material. Everyone is excited about the material again. The outpouring of research on graphene is unprecedented.

Anyone can make it pretty quickly and people have made it different ways. It’s not expensive to make graphene. You need an oven, a tube, argon, hydrogen, and something that is carbon rich.

How could graphene change electronics?

It will let us directly write circuitry. Right now, you have an expensive fabrication process with lots of expensive machinery. If you could directly write it, you simplify the process. Everything would be custom-made, allowing us to generate circuits on demand.

Credit: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Updated.

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Boonsri Dickinson

About Boonsri Dickinson

Boonsri Dickinson was a contributing editor for SmartPlanet from 2010 to 2012.

Boonsri Dickinson

Boonsri Dickinson

Contributing Editor

Boonsri Dickinson is a freelance journalist based in San Francisco. She has written for Discover, The Huffington Post, Forbes, Nature Biotech, Technewsdaily.com, Techstartups.com and AOL. She's currently a reporter for Business Insider. She holds degrees from the University of Florida and the University of Colorado at Boulder.

Follow her on Twitter.

Boonsri Dickinson

Boonsri Dickinson

In the unlikely event that Boonsri has a professional or financial relationship with a company she writes about, it will be prominently disclosed.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
10
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Graphene, Graphene, Graphene. Read all about it.
I don't understand. Why is Mr. Sheehan turning graphene oxide
into graphene oxide?
Posted by Serton
8th Jul 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Graphene, Graphene, Graphene. Read all about it.
It was a typo. It should have read "...graphite into graphene oxide..."
Posted by hoodedswan
8th Jul 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Graphene, Graphene, Graphene. Read all about it.
How about starting out by telling us what it is. And what it basically could be used for. Really this is the worst general science reporting I have seen in a while. Only thing worse would have been to throw in some abbreviations(which some people call acronyms tho often they are not) without explaining what they stand for
Posted by Greenbau
8th Jul 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Graphene, Graphene, Graphene. Read all about it.
I have to agree.

I am sorry Ms. Dickinson, but I dont think anybody but you or Mr.
Sheehan (???) have any idea what Graphene is, does, or what the
point of this article is.

Pretty picture, though...
Posted by shermanbarnes3
8th Jul 2010
0 Votes
+ -
custom...
While custom circuits, like custom anything, would fit their application more perfectly. (though adaptive custom circuits--which could learn with experience would be even better!) Too much customization isn't necessarily a good thing...unless you have widespread tech to produce/reproduce them.

Custom means no ability to repair w/o the exact part.

Custom can mean thousands of designs which are inefficient or otherwise lacking--perhaps in vital areas.

Al of the 'new' carbon is amazing if only because anyone you asked prior to nanotech would have said "we know everything there is to know about carbon."

What other things do we not study because we "know everything?"
Posted by wizoddg
8th Jul 2010
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: Graphene, Graphene, Graphene. Read all about it.
For those who need more information, Carbon has several forms.

Diamond is a 3 dimensional crystal of carbon atoms. Graphite is a flat 2 dimensional crystal of carbon atoms with the 2 dimensional areas stacked on top of each other, so that they slide readily. Graphene is a single layer of the graphite structure. as such, it is close to the ideal semiconductor material for shallow parts. We have only recently learned to make it in quantity. there are also tube and ball forms, as well as mixed like soot.

The Article is looking at uses that are still at least 10 years off.

Semiconductors like computer chips are very complex. A typical computer processor may have over a billion transistors on it. Each transistor has resistors and capacitors connected by conductive tracers (Think wires) all this is made out of silicone with addition of some trace elements. Some make it conductive, some make it resistive, some make it an insulator, and some a conductor.

We use a light mask (currently UV, tending towards X-rays. The semiconductor manufacturing process is more like printing pictures than it is like building a car.

The Article talks about using an atomic force microscope to form the material. This is an established technology, but you are literally moving one atom at a time. It takes at least 7 atoms to form a transistor. Traces generally need to be more than 30 atoms wide, with capacitors bigger than that by several times. To make a computer like this will take a great deal of time.

Graphene has several good uses. It conducts heat readily, so it can be easily cooled. It can withstand temperatures of several thousand degrees. Semiconductors usually generate heat as a function of frequency. A couple of years ago, computers stopped getting faster because it was no longer possible to increase the clock speed without melting the microprocessor!. Graphene doesn't melt easily. It is, however quite flamible. If there is any oxygen, it will burn up.

I think they will have to encapsulate the processors in ceramic. That is a relatively easy use of an established tech also.

But, to wait while the fab makes several billion connections? I don't think that is practical.

Well, we'll see. Maybe they have something I don't know about that will rescue the economics of this.
Posted by YetAnotherBob
8th Jul 2010
0 Votes
+ -
Check out the links
For those who wanted more info, you just had to refer to the links provided in this article. The very first word in this article is a link to a previous article Ms. Dickinson did on graphene last June, which gives an overview of the process of reducing graphene oxide (removing the oxygen) to create pure graphene. That article also links to an MIT Technology Review article that goes into more detail.

Sure, this article doesn't answer some basic questions about graphene. But doing so would have doubled its size and simply repeated what had been stated adequately elsewhere. That's old-school media. Anybody who knows how to use the web should have had no problem getting all the info he or she wanted in just a few seconds.
Posted by zackers
8th Jul 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Graphene, Graphene, Graphene. Read all about it.
Ah, but that June article was badly written, too. And it still has uncorrected typos, like 'ride' for 'rid'.

It also has enough poorly constructed (when not outright ungrammatical sentences) that any of my high school English teachers would have returned the paper (yes, it was that long ago) with lots of red marks on it.

I am amazed that any editor would allow her to write articles.
Posted by mejohnsn
27th Jul 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Graphene, Graphene, Graphene. Read all about it.
Since "high school english teachers" were accepting "paper" as a medium of transmission as recently as june of 2010, the value of your time statement seems less than pertinent, as in fact, are comments about the level of rhetoric.

"smart planet" redounds with incompetent science, "gee whiz" writing styles and irrelevance. this article, of itself, had the refreshing advantage of being about something, rather than what people think about something.

in the meantime, the usa often appears desperate for qualified teachers of grammar, rhetoric and exposition. perhaps some of the commenters here are auditioning.
Posted by gabriel bear
3rd Aug 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Graphene, Graphene, Graphene. Read all about it.
I think Boonsri is really cute so back off !
Posted by beneˈ
15th Feb 2011
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!