Follow this blog:
RSS

$2.5B NASA rover takes off to look for life on Mars

By | November 28, 2011, 11:36 AM PST

NASA’s $2.5 billion rover Curiosity launched from Cape Canaveral, Fla. on Saturday. For the next eight and a half months, the Mars Science Laboratory’s nuclear-powered rover will be traveling to Mars.

When the rover arrives, it will sample Martian soil and rock to look signs of microbial life on Mars.

The SUV-sized rover will look for methane and determine if a gas is biological or geological, according to NASA.

The mission will aim to:

  • See if there’s biological material by looking for organic carbon compounds
  • Check out the geology of the rover’s field site
  • Look into the role of water to see if there was any evidence of past habitability
  • Measure surface radiation

It’s worth wishing Curiosity luck since it will spend most of 2012 in deep space before the rover gets to Mars.

The landing next August might be rough. Once it hits the surface, it will travel around the Gale Crater (pictured above), which is an area that might have signs of life.

“It requires a fancy power supply in order to do the job,” said MSL’s Pam Conrad said in a statement. “This enables us to make measurements all day, every day, at night, in the winter.” It is powered by a plutonium-powered battery that is expected to last for at least two (Earth) years.

NASA’s Colleen Hartman told the New York Times:

“Mars really is the Bermuda Triangle of the solar system. It’s the death planet, and the United States of America is the only nation in the world that has ever landed and driven robotic explorers on the surface of Mars, and now we’re set to do it again.”

Image Credit: NASA/Darrell L. McCall and NASA/JPL-Caltech/ESA/DLR/FU Berlin/MSSS and NASA/JPL-Caltech

via The New York Times

Related on SmartPlanet:

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Boonsri Dickinson

About Boonsri Dickinson

Boonsri Dickinson was a contributing editor for SmartPlanet from 2010 to 2012.

Boonsri Dickinson

Boonsri Dickinson

Contributing Editor

Boonsri Dickinson is a freelance journalist based in San Francisco. She has written for Discover, The Huffington Post, Forbes, Nature Biotech, Technewsdaily.com, Techstartups.com and AOL. She's currently a reporter for Business Insider. She holds degrees from the University of Florida and the University of Colorado at Boulder.

Follow her on Twitter.

Boonsri Dickinson

Boonsri Dickinson

In the unlikely event that Boonsri has a professional or financial relationship with a company she writes about, it will be prominently disclosed.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
5
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
Deja Vu
ANOTHER Rover?? With the state of America's economy, this is unbelievably selfish and wasteful. The taxpayers got bilked out of 2.5 billion dollars so that a handful of scientists and engineers could once again get their rocks off on Mars.

NASA had it's chance; two rovers and God knows how many surveillance crafts later, they still can't come up with anything truly significant. I, for one, don't give a rat's a$$ about "life on Mars" anymore after hearing about it for the last ten years.

We can't afford NASA's do-overs anymore, and as far as I'm concerned NASA has become another special interest group, consuming massive resources that benefit few. Next time you see a homeless and starving person on our very own streets, point to Mars and explain to them where their hot meal and shelter have gone.
Posted by ddferrari
Updated - 29th Nov 2011
0 Votes
+ -
Deja Vu is right
Every time we get an article about human exploration we get some Scrooge like you who thinks it's a waste of money.

The Curiosity Rover was completed in 2008 and the waste would have been not launching it after all of the money spent building it in the first place.
Posted by riverat1
29th Nov 2011
0 Votes
+ -
Well...
"the waste would have been not launching it after all of the money spent building it" - this is your justification? Apparently, my point went right over your head. The waste was spending the money in the first place. If calling out wasteful and redundant govt. spending in the midst of a serious recession makes me a scrooge, then I proudly call myself scrooge.

Sorry, are you under the impression that things were better in 2008 than they are now?
Posted by ddferrari
4th Dec 2011
+1 Vote
+ -
Best and Brightest
Congrats to the NASA team; some of the best and brightest professionals in the world. Hopefully a successful mission will follow this successful launch. Many hurdles to leap over the next few years. Including the naysayers that think this mission is a waste of money. That cell phone and micro-computer you are using is a direct result of the space program. And who knows what technology will come from our little trip to Mars. $2.5 Billion have kept and will keep many high paying professionals employed in this sour economy. To blame NASA and this particular program for the state of homeless and starving people in this country is a bit of a stretch.
Posted by dcr100@...
29th Nov 2011
-1 Votes
+ -
I'm not
blaming NASA exclusively for homelessness and starvation, I'm pointing out that yet another mission to Mars is not a priority right now with the current state of the country.

Space exploration is a luxury, not a necessity of life. If one is struggling to pay the rent, that's not the time to take that cruise they've been yearning for. NASA is one of many non-essential programs that should be pared back until America gets out of serious financial trouble.

Here's some interesting math: if that 2.5 billion of taxpayer $ had been given to families in foreclosure, and each of those families needed an average of $150k to own their house outright and not become homeless, 16,666 (yes, sixteen thousand) families could have kept their houses. You can take THAT to the bank, unlike the technology that may or may not trickle down in the next few years from this mission.

If you really believe that an expensive robot on a distant planet benefits mankind more than actually using said money to make a direct and immediate impact on people's lives, it's time to lower your gaze from the heavens and pay attention to the planet you live on.
Posted by ddferrari
Updated - 4th Dec 2011
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!