Follow this blog:
RSS

Why the BPA scare has gotten scarier

By | November 5, 2009, 11:18 AM PST

Last year, at ZDNet Healthcare, I did a series of stories about BPA (right), a chemical used to harden plastics, about its potential as a health hazard, and about how makers of plastic bottles were getting rid of it.

This past September our Andrew Nusca continued that discussion here at Smartplanet, focusing on the possibility that the chemical, and others like it, may be making us fat.

This week, Consumer Reports is turning the scare dial up further, with a feature in its December print issue saying that canned goods also contain BPA.

This does not surprise me, because plastic coatings are frequently sprayed inside metal containers, both soft pouches and cans, in order to create an antiseptic barrier between the food going in and the metal they’re housed in.

For your protection.

This news is scarier because we really don’t know how much BPA results in damage. Current studies on that question are several decades old.

All this may make those who tossed their Nalgene bottles after the first BPA scare feel silly. You thought you were making yourself safer replacing plastic with metal. But what if the metal were sprayed with plastic, for your protection?

There are no simple answers here.

  • We need research on plasticizers, to find a chemical that’s safe for food containment.
  • Factories and canning facilities will have to be retrofitted to use the new chemical stat.
  • And what do our food companies do in the meantime?
  • We need to know just how much damage has already been done, what BPA levels deliver how much danger.

Then there are the legal questions. Is BPA going to be the new asbestos? The same companies that created BPA are going to be relied upon to do the research on its replacement.

Finally there is also the question of time. The replacement of CFCs with other chemicals in refrigerators, to protect the ozone layer, was a multi-decade process. And we already had replacements available.

The lesson here is that science, regulators, and producers should never get complacent. In 2007 there was enormous pushback from manufacturers claiming (without ample evidence) that BPA was completely safe. Now panic has set in.

Maybe if we had a scientific level of uncertainty on the front end we could avoid these panics on the back end.

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Dana Blankenhorn

About Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn was a contributing editor for SmartPlanet from 2009 to 2010.

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn

Contributing Editor, Healthcare

Dana Blankenhorn has written for the Chicago Tribune, Advertising Age's "NetMarketing" supplement and founded the Interactive Age Daily for CMP Media. He holds degrees from Rice and Northwestern universities. He is based in Atlanta.

Follow him on Twitter.

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn has been a technology reporter since 1982, a business reporter since 1978, and a writer for as long as he can remember. His Schwab IRA has a few tech stocks in it, most notably some Intel and Applied Materials bought over 10 years ago. But the vast majority of his tiny fortune (emphasis on the word tiny) is invested in mutual funds. He presently writes for no one else but ZDNet, SmartPlanet and himself. But if you've got an opportunity let him know. If he takes the gig he"ll first add it to this disclosure page.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

4
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
Kind of reminds me of how the use of lead pipes...
...may have lead to the downfall of the Roman Empire. Ironic.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
6th Nov 2009
0 Votes
+ -
The cautionary principle
In science, there is something known as "The Cautionary Principle". It says that, until you have sufficient supporting evidence, you shouldn't conclude that something is safe.

Unfortunately, since it takes time to get that evidence, the principle tends to get thrown out in favour of profits.
Posted by mheartwood
6th Nov 2009
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Why the BPA scare has gotten scarier
it is also true that until one has sufficient supporting evidence one should not conclude that something is unsafe.
we live in a country and an age of hysteria. there is no cure for that.
Posted by stilt21
6th Nov 2009
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Why the BPA scare has gotten scarier
How about glass? A set of standard size, shape and colors would minimize the number of types of containers. They would be handled by retailers like the old pop bottles of yore. But on a bigger scale. The containers could be swapped between food manufacturers. A water soluble glue would hold a vendor label on the bottle. The cap could be customized for a vendor so the contents could be identified if the label came off. Of course a deposit would be paid. Customers could return bottles for the deposit. Vendors would pay the retailers the same deposit when they collected the bottles.
Posted by TrueDinosaur
12th Nov 2009
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet Community and join the conversation! Signing-up is free and quick, Do it now, we want to hear your opinion.