Follow this blog:
RSS

Why feds won’t approve a pill to cure obesity epidemic

By | October 25, 2010, 7:29 AM PDT

Arena Phamaceuticals seems to have become the first victim of a new, more skeptical view at the FDA.

Its obesity drug, lorcaserin, has either been shot down or put into an FDA purgatory.

(This image is from Supersizedmeals.com, which celebrates big food, of a lunch sold recently just a few miles from my home. Is it lunch time yet?)

The Phase III trial results for the drug were published back in June, and Arena’s press release at the time said the drug offered “significant” weight loss and improved maintenance of a healthier weight.

But that’s not the FDA’s view. A panel voted 9-5 against approval in September.

There are concerns about tumors in rats, about a trial with diabetic patients and about marginal effectiveness. And it comes just a few weeks after the diet pill Meridia was pulled from the shelves.

Arena, which kept hope alive in a press statement calling the turn down “an important step” toward FDA approval (and investors are still with it) is facing two tough trends:

  1. The FDA is generally more skeptical of new drugs than a few years ago, as the impact of studies showing most studies are wrong sinks in.
  2. There are ways to cure obesity without drugs, including surgery and simple diet-and-exercise.

The skepticism may have scientific validity but it flies in the face of an enormous industry that won’t take kindly to a new policy. And approaching obesity from the supply side — policies that encourage production of local fruit and vegetable supplies — would fly in the face of another super-sized lobby, the food lobby.

Then there are all those regular folks who insist that reliance on self-discipline will solve the problem, or that there’s not a problem. It’s true that dietary discipline is the best way to lose weight, and keep it off.

But consider. What if you were morbidly obese right now.

Wouldn’t that picture look better than sex?

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Dana Blankenhorn

About Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn was a contributing editor for SmartPlanet from 2009 to 2010.

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn

Contributing Editor

Dana Blankenhorn has written for the Chicago Tribune, Advertising Age's "NetMarketing" supplement and founded the Interactive Age Daily for CMP Media. He holds degrees from Rice and Northwestern universities. He is based in Atlanta.

Follow him on Twitter.

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn has been a technology reporter since 1982, a business reporter since 1978, and a writer for as long as he can remember. His Schwab IRA has a few tech stocks in it, most notably some Intel and Applied Materials bought over 10 years ago. But the vast majority of his tiny fortune (emphasis on the word tiny) is invested in mutual funds. He presently writes for no one else but ZDNet, SmartPlanet and himself. But if you've got an opportunity let him know. If he takes the gig he"ll first add it to this disclosure page.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
15
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: Why feds won't approve a pill to cure obesity epidemic
Auto-suggestion is a powerful way to change one's behavior (when wants to change). People laugh at hypnosis, but those who understand the power of self-talk recognize that changing our own attitude toward food is easier and faster than a lap-band and comes with fewer side-effects (and no surgery or drugs).
Posted by markpowers80@...
25th Oct 2010
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: Why feds won't approve a pill to cure obesity epidemic
I'm betting that research in gut bacteria holds the solution. A drug
that makes you feel full doesn't counteract the joy of eating.
Posted by jtdavies
25th Oct 2010
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: Why feds won't approve a pill to cure obesity epidemic
considering all the new drugs that have been made for diseases that have been invented, and all the new ones that are no better, maybe not as good, as the old ones , and all those new ones that have side effects that are not just annoying but really dangerous and sometimes fatal. it is wise or the fda to go slowly.
after a lifetime of working mostly in the fda regulated industry, when drug companies were known as 'ethical drug companies' i find the present day companies that care less about the patient and only worry about their bottom line rather disgusting..
we always taught our employes that the next pesron using the product might be you or your family, so take care in your work. that idea seems to have been laft at the wayside.
Posted by stilt21
25th Oct 2010
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: Why feds won't approve a pill to cure obesity epidemic
Let's make the following assumptions:
1. The pill works
2. It has no ill effects for humans, but has the added benefit of killing rats (Where do you think blood thinners come from).
3. It make ugly bald men hansome and hairy (on top of our heads instead of our backs).
It could be God's gift to weight loss, so who's the biggest loser?
The food producers and distributors? No. Now I can have my cake and eat it too, as long as I take the magic rat killing thin guy pill.
The drug companies? No. Who do you think will be selling this drug or something to offset any bad side effects.
Well, if there is any truth (I think not) to the impending collapse of Social Security and/or Medicare, our budget crisis will loom large, sooner than expected, since current mortality rates were used to calculate when the money would run out. OMB, etc. are counting on the fatties of the world (mainly USA fatties (I am a card carrying member)) to do our patriotic duty and die off sooner rather than later, according to their amortization schedule. If we live too long and/or too healthy, it will throw their entire plan out of wack.
Posted by PSFTGURU@...
25th Oct 2010
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: Why feds won't approve a pill to cure obesity epidemic
That's it! Need improvement? Take a pill! No need to watch what you eat, what you do. No need to exercise. The only reason to lift a finger is to take the cure-all pill.

In the year 3535... Everything you think do and say is in the pill you took today.
Posted by bb_apptix
25th Oct 2010
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: Why feds won't approve a pill to cure obesity epidemic
That's it! Need improvement? Take a pill! No need to watch what you
eat, what you do. No need to exercise. The only reason to lift a finger
is to take the cure-all pill.

A rather simplistic view.
Posted by pervleft
25th Oct 2010
-1 Votes
+ -
bb_apptix
Someone is showing their age. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_the_Year_2525 Although only after looking it up did I learn the authors were from Lincoln,Nebraska.

Go Huskers?
Posted by DanaBlankenhorn
25th Oct 2010
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: Why feds won't approve a pill to cure obesity epidemic
>But consider. What if you were morbidly obese right now.

I am.

>Wouldn?t that picture look better than sex?

No, it doesn't.

Contrary to popular belief, fatties don't masturbate to Betty
Crocker.
Posted by cdpt
25th Oct 2010
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: Why feds won't approve a pill to cure obesity epidemic
But are we fat because we're stupid? I just read this article that answers that question. Great read if you are concerned about the obesity epidemic...
http://biovedawellness.com/2010/10/is-the-obesity-epidemic-a-result-of-our-stupidity/
Posted by jenstate
25th Oct 2010
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: Why feds won't approve a pill to cure obesity epidemic
And what about the people that can't exercise because of disabilities, did you keep that in mind?
Posted by Tinman57
25th Oct 2010
+1 Vote
+ -
Tinman57
Please. Can't exercise at all? Eat less. You're trapped in your body already -- don't make it worse.

We're not fat because we're stupid or lazy or American. We're fat because our government's policies starting in the 1930s were wickedly effective in producing cheap protein and starch, and in encouraging their consumption.

Anyone who questions the effectiveness of government action just needs to look around them to see the lie in that. It's told in every 46 inch waist you see.

My point remains we can change policy. We can change direction, if we choose to do so. That's what elections are about. Making choices as to what the government should and should not do.
Posted by DanaBlankenhorn
26th Oct 2010
+1 Vote
+ -
Still no explaination
I'd be skeptical about any "solution" without an explanation.

Go and watch any movie or tv show made before 1965.

See...no fat people. Or if there is a fat person, he would get a special name...like Fats. Or a woman would be called Big Bertha.

But guess what -- we are all Fats and Big Berthas now.

Why?
Posted by jabailo1
26th Oct 2010
+1 Vote
+ -
jabailo1
We didn't really get into this problem all at once and we won't get out of it all at once either.

I've emphasized the role of supply policy because it's ignored. Many things are taking place on the demand side of the equation as well. Having more people given regular care, which includes helping them find a diet system that works, is said to be coming.
Posted by DanaBlankenhorn
26th Oct 2010
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: Why feds won't approve a pill to cure obesity epidemic
Let's face it. When you celebrate overeating on television shows like 'Man vs Food' or 'Who can eat the most' contests, the young folks think it's cool to stuff your gut.
Posted by ITOdeed
29th Oct 2010
+1 Vote
+ -
EatingHay
I was thinking of doing a blog post here making that point, but I'm afraid it might be taken as political.
Posted by DanaBlankenhorn
30th Oct 2010
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!