Follow this blog:
RSS

They are closing in on Tylenol

By | August 17, 2010, 8:46 AM PDT

I have been following the Tylenol story for some time now, with increasing amazement.

How could a company that once wrote the book on crisis management fail at it so completely? By management design, writes Inder Sidhu of Cisco.

The company has a deliberately decentralized management structure, so when CEO William Weldon pulls his Sgt. Schultz routine he may be telling the honest truth. (Picture from Wikipedia.)

When I called Tylenol’s owner, McNeil Labs, the next BP a few months ago I got no pushback — readers here get exercised when I criticize corn syrup.

What began last year with a few recalls has now mushroomed:

All this is drowning out the good news. Warren Buffett has doubled his holding in the stock. The company recently sold $1.1 billion in bonds at good rates. A University of Florida study shows acetaminophen may be good for hurt feelings.

Tylenol is not a new drug. It has been around since the year I was born. Its history goes back almost as far as that of aspirin, which was first produced commercially in 1897.

If all this can happen to Tylenol, in other words, no drug is safe. That’s your take-away.

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Dana Blankenhorn

About Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn was a contributing editor for SmartPlanet from 2009 to 2010.

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn

Contributing Editor, Healthcare

Dana Blankenhorn has written for the Chicago Tribune, Advertising Age's "NetMarketing" supplement and founded the Interactive Age Daily for CMP Media. He holds degrees from Rice and Northwestern universities. He is based in Atlanta.

Follow him on Twitter.

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn has been a technology reporter since 1982, a business reporter since 1978, and a writer for as long as he can remember. His Schwab IRA has a few tech stocks in it, most notably some Intel and Applied Materials bought over 10 years ago. But the vast majority of his tiny fortune (emphasis on the word tiny) is invested in mutual funds. He presently writes for no one else but ZDNet, SmartPlanet and himself. But if you've got an opportunity let him know. If he takes the gig he"ll first add it to this disclosure page.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

3
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
RE: They are closing in on Tylenol
tylenol no longer has the help that Young and Rubicam (and all their associated subsidiaries) provided backin the 1980's!
Posted by richgb@...
17th Aug 2010
0 Votes
+ -
richgb@...
Yes, PR is far more important than quality manufacturing. (That's a
joke -- I take your point and agree with it.)
Posted by DanaBlankenhorn
17th Aug 2010
0 Votes
+ -
No drug is safe
Of course no drug is safe. For one thing, they currently spread throughout the body and are absorbed by systems other than the one they are meant to affect. Their effects often depend on the genetic makeup of the person taking them. A person's age, what he or she currently eats, or even the amount of sunlight he or she gets can also affect the effectiveness of a drug or trigger side-effects.

If commonly consumed things such as fat, sugar, and tobacco can have such widespread (negative) effects on the body, then certainly drugs can as well. It's all just chemistry.

A big problem of the FDA drug approval process is that drugs must be shown to be safe for everybody and effective for a large percentage of those taking them. This eliminates a lot of drugs that could have targeted benefits for some people. As we move towards figuring out which drugs will benefit a person on the basis of their DNA, this standard model of FDA testing will fail. For one thing, for a given drug there might be hundreds of genetic variants for which the drug might be effective, and hundreds for which it will not. A full-scale three stage FDA testing process can easily cost hundreds of millions of dollars, so there's no way it can be done for each possible genetic variance. Coming up with new ways of testing drugs will be just as important as creating the drugs in the first place.
Posted by zackers
20th Aug 2010
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet Community and join the conversation! Signing-up is free and quick, Do it now, we want to hear your opinion.