Follow this blog:
RSS

The transformation of health IT

By | December 28, 2009, 7:58 AM PST

The events of 2009 have set up a transformation of the health care Information Technology (IT) industry, and we will start to see the results through next year.

IBM’s financing of several major industry players, including Siemens, is just a taste of what is to come.

As the year began health IT was a closed club of proprietary vendors whose annual trade show, HIMSS, was like a Comdex from the 1980s. These vendors defined industry standards through a certification committee they had created, and those were based on specifications, not whether the stuff worked.

The most vital industry standard was a billing code, controlled by the American Medical Association. Health IT was not about health — it was about getting paid.

With the passage of the Obama stimulus a bureaucratic war began to control the money. The industry lost. Instead, committees under new National Coordinator for Health IT, David Blumenthal (above), defined “meaningful use” and eligibility for stimulus money functionally.

It’s no longer, does this software have these features and codes set up by the industry. It’s does this software actually deliver meaningful data that can transform how an office works.

To underline all this, the first grants will go to so-called “beacon communities,” small cities that are already drawing valuable data from their health IT systems, and acting on that data. The money will boost those efforts in hopes of creating best practices others will follow.

Power in the industry has shifted, in other words, from software designers who code specifications to consultants who act on what data tells them. It’s no longer about the inputs. It’s about using the outputs.

The smell of stimulus cash drove Hewlett Packard’s purchase of EDS, and Dell’s purchase of Perot Systems. The industry is being pushed toward a systems approach, and the mainline IT industry is responding.

As 2009 began the health IT vendors to know were Cerner, McKesson, GE Healthcare and Siemens. As 2009 ends the names to know are HP. Dell, Microsoft and IBM. Oracle gets a seat at this table because Sun Microsystems, which it’s in the process of buying, sold the tools to make NHIN-Connect, which is now being called the “Health Internet.”

The easiest prediction to make for 2010 is there will be a lot of merger and acquisition activity in this space. IBM’s financing of major vendors gives it visibility as this financial dance begins.

The industry that greets 2011 will be nothing like the one that saw in 2009.

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Dana Blankenhorn

About Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn was a contributing editor for SmartPlanet from 2009 to 2010.

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn

Contributing Editor

Dana Blankenhorn has written for the Chicago Tribune, Advertising Age's "NetMarketing" supplement and founded the Interactive Age Daily for CMP Media. He holds degrees from Rice and Northwestern universities. He is based in Atlanta.

Follow him on Twitter.

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn has been a technology reporter since 1982, a business reporter since 1978, and a writer for as long as he can remember. His Schwab IRA has a few tech stocks in it, most notably some Intel and Applied Materials bought over 10 years ago. But the vast majority of his tiny fortune (emphasis on the word tiny) is invested in mutual funds. He presently writes for no one else but ZDNet, SmartPlanet and himself. But if you've got an opportunity let him know. If he takes the gig he"ll first add it to this disclosure page.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
3
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
RE: The transformation of health IT
Good overview, Dana. Hope you had a nice holiday.
Posted by ahier
28th Dec 2009
0 Votes
+ -
RE: The transformation of health IT
It is amazing to me, no make that annoying, how "successfully" the health care community has avoided meaningful implementation of computing technology. Most "businesses" would have gone out of business had they ignored the benefits of good functional computing assets. Long overdue. Eventually reality sinks in; in this case, because the cost trend lines, as well as the poor quality of our health care, finally got bad enough to force the acceptance of the need for much better computing software. There?s no other way to reduce costs, improve quality, and service. It all comes down to analysis and management of huge amounts of data which can not be done without the use of computers!
Posted by GarryGR
29th Dec 2009
0 Votes
+ -
GarryGR
It comes down to market incentives. Where is the incentive for a doctor or hospital to go with a cost-effective solution, since they're paid the same amount of money either way?
Posted by DanaBlankenhorn
7th Jan 2010
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!