Follow this blog:
RSS

The primary care shortage starts now

By | August 3, 2010, 10:10 AM PDT

It doesn’t take an economist to understand that if you cut the supply of something while dramatically increasing demand, and refuse to adjust pricing, you are going to have a shortage.

The primary care crisis is on. (Picture of a primary care physician taking blood pressure from Wikipedia.)

A paper in today’s New England Journal of Medicine describes how 30,000 recent immigrants had their coverage transferred to a carrier called CeltiCare and quickly found themselves without primary care, despite the carrier’s promises.

(NOTE: The article in question was actually published August 4, the day after this was written. My apologies for misreading the embargo date and letting this in early.)

The report was written by doctors at a competitor, Cambridge Health Alliance (CHA), who contacted doctors listed by CeltiCare within their coverage area, and found only a third taking any new patients, with an average wait time of 33 days.

The CHA is linked to Physicians for a National Health Plan, which sent me a link to the study and supports a single-payer health plan for the U.S., but the result could have also been sent by a Tea Party opponent of health reform.

Both sides gain support for their positions from it. There aren’t enough primary care doctors to meet demand. Do we ration them based on need, or let the market tell poorer patients they are on their own?

This primary care shortage is not news. The CHA results were easy to verify by any reporter with a phone. Massachusetts has been trying to address the shortage by allowing more limited care facilities, like MinuteClinics, staffed by physicians’ assistants or nurses.

Another way to deal with the problem is to import doctors. An advocate for foreign medical schools, John Norcini, has published a study in the journal Health Affairs saying foreign-trained doctors (many from India or Pakistan) do just as well for their patients as American-trained physicians.

But even taken together, clinics and imports won’t really address the shortage in a timely manner. The Affordable Care Act is similar in design and intent to Massachusetts’ reform law, which is already running into trouble meeting demand.

All this is about to hit Dr. Donald Berwick full in the face. Medicare is America’s low-cost provider of health care. Berwick, as head of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid, must find a way to dramatically increase the supply of primary care even while the number of primary care doctors shrinks dramatically.

The PA will see you now.

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Dana Blankenhorn

About Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn was a contributing editor for SmartPlanet from 2009 to 2010.

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn

Contributing Editor, Healthcare

Dana Blankenhorn has written for the Chicago Tribune, Advertising Age's "NetMarketing" supplement and founded the Interactive Age Daily for CMP Media. He holds degrees from Rice and Northwestern universities. He is based in Atlanta.

Follow him on Twitter.

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn has been a technology reporter since 1982, a business reporter since 1978, and a writer for as long as he can remember. His Schwab IRA has a few tech stocks in it, most notably some Intel and Applied Materials bought over 10 years ago. But the vast majority of his tiny fortune (emphasis on the word tiny) is invested in mutual funds. He presently writes for no one else but ZDNet, SmartPlanet and himself. But if you've got an opportunity let him know. If he takes the gig he"ll first add it to this disclosure page.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

24
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
This what I was telling you Dana...
Massachusetts is ahead of the curve because of the state legislation, but the reality is this problem will rapidly spread nation wide.

If you look at the English and Canadian systems you advocate so much for, they are rapidly being filled with imported help from third world nations.

Their hearts may be in the job, but their training is often lacking. Many of them also lack the language skills to effectively communicate with patients.
Posted by Hates Idiots
3rd Aug 2010
0 Votes
+ -
Hates Idiots
So the study in Health Affairs was bad science? It says foreign-
trained and foreign-born doctors actually performed a little better
-- I called it equivalent but the numbers were actually a little
better. Their hearts were definitely in it.

I don't deny the problem is real, but the answer to a demand
excess and price limits is to find a way to increase supply, I feel,
rather than limit demand to only those who bid highest. We've
seen what that does -- it makes people sicker and costs more.
Posted by DanaBlankenhorn
3rd Aug 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: The primary care shortage starts now
--The PA will see you now.

In fact, the PA should see you now, for at least half of what you see your PC physician for. Our odd non-system of health payment often results in the equivalent of asking college professors to teach kindergarten.

I'm sure Berwick is well aware not only of the primary care physician shortage, but of the many possibilities for using trained physicians (and PAs) more efficiently than we do now.
Posted by inkling1
4th Aug 2010
0 Votes
+ -
About to get worse . . .
Seeing as Obamacare is about to go into effect . . . things are
about to get worse. I known several bright young medical
students who decided to get out of the field because there's no
money in it any longer. Traditionally, we pay higher wages to
those whose value to society is great. But the socialization of
medicine treats the value and expertise of doctors below their
true worth by paying them less. If you want more doctors, pay
them better. Give them an incentive to want to become and stay
doctors rather than lowering their pay and governing them (Does
Congress really believe they know better than doctors?). It's like
anything else in the land of opportunity. People aren't going to
choose a job no matter how noble the profession if it doesn't pay
well versus the amount of education they would need to do it.

Why spend seven years in medical school if the patients you treat
don't value your expertise? If they valued it, they'd pay for it.
Doesn't it seem funny that we are willing to put up with paying
basketball players millions of dollars while we complain how
expensive medicine is? A surplus of doctors would decrease the
cost of medicine. Yet the more we socialize the higher the cost
the fewer doctors we will see . . . and the more taxes we will see.
Do you honestly believe the wealthiest people in this country are
going to shoulder this financial nightmare alone? There aren't
enough rich people. Guess who the government comes after
next in terms of taxes?

Don't get me started on the ridiculous malpractice insurance.

If your answer is, "well, those who value human life more than a
pay check will choose to be doctors", then I say you're right. But
don't be surprised that there are fewer doctors now.
Posted by razorsyntax
4th Aug 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: The primary care shortage starts now
Both PA's and RN's could do 90% of the care currently being done by MD's. But, the AMA wont let them. We have to get by the AMA, which may be the most effective trade union on the planet.
Posted by abear4562
4th Aug 2010
0 Votes
+ -
inkling1
I agree with you, so long as there is technology and time to allow
a physician to act as back-up.

The model should be the doctor at the top of a pyramid, more like
the manager of a ball club than a player. The training is
expensive, and even a newly-minted internist is well worth their
six-figure salary. So if technology, PAs and RNs can extend the
value of that doctor's time by a factor of several, that's a good
thing.

This is really what the medical home is about. Put a team in
charge of patients, compensate based on the number of people
and time, then manage wellness instead of illness.
Posted by DanaBlankenhorn
4th Aug 2010
0 Votes
+ -
Costs of medical training
US medical training is excellent but the costs are high and hard to pay off for new doctors. The fees and reimbursement for medicare and medicaid are too low in many instances for the doctors to make enough money to live on and pay off school debts. It makes some sense that foreign medical schools can produce qualified doctors at a lower cost to the doctor so that they can afford to deal with more medicare patients.

I was in the military and did not have a primary care physician. Medical care started with sick call and being checked over by medics who would take care of the majority of problems before sending the patient to a military hospital with more resources. A clinic based health system could work the same way to keep the patient load down for the available doctors.
Posted by sboverie@...
4th Aug 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: The primary care shortage starts now
This is only one of the early instances of the law of unintended
consequences kicking in. Supply will eventually catch up, but it may
take 15-20 years to do so, because that is how long it takes to
educate a physician. So what do we do in the meantime? Costa
Rica, Mexico, India are already "meditourist" locations for
Americans. Expect that to ramp up.

Technically, I am a Baby Boomer, though a "Young Boomer" as I
was born at the tail end of the boom. I mark this down as yet
another instance of the Flower Generation, those boomers in their
late 50's and early 60's adjusting matters to suit them with no regard
for those who come after. That whole population cohort has left a
trail of destruction as it has moved through our country's history.
Posted by DaveDonaldson
4th Aug 2010
0 Votes
+ -
Good For Democare
All sorts of good things will happen.

Insurers are stopping writing policies on children because if they cover any child (now thanks to Democare) they have to cover children with pre-existing conditions.

All business have to file 1090 forms on any supplier who sells them goods at $600 or more (the only health this will do is give euthanasia to small business without a hospice)

Buying or selling your gold or silver - thanks to Democare evey gold and/or silver transaction must be reported to the Imperial Federal Government

Texas, and many other states are facing shortages of primary care physicians, and many are retiring rather than work under Democare.

But as long as the GREEDY pigs who want other people to take care of them are happy, then so are the democrats/progressives/liberals/socialists (All one and the same)
Posted by Albee_Freeoneday
4th Aug 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: The primary care shortage starts now
Yes, there is a real problem, everyone knew about it decades ago, and did nothing to correct the problem. Naturally I see a couple of ways to ease the problem.

First pay primary care doctors or their student loans to be primary care doctors as an incentive.

Second require all doctors to be primary care doctors for a set period of time to become a doctor not unlike their internship at hospitals.

Third make robots to handel 70 to 90 precent of the everyday patents visits. I had a medical program for my Commadore 128 that was able to diagonist my Graves desease before any of the several doctors I saw. They could take a good deal of the burden off doctors who could still verify the results.
Posted by randolphgarrison1@...
4th Aug 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: The primary care shortage starts now
@randolphgarrision--Idea number 1, OK. Idea number 2, are you
insane? If you mean make that a requirement as a condition of having
their student loans forgiven, OK. But if you just want to peremptorily
order all med school graduates to obey your dictate, you're nuts. And
idea number 3 has got to be tongue in cheek, or you really are nuts.
Posted by DaveDonaldson
4th Aug 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: The primary care shortage starts now
There are a large number of RNs in the Philippines who could help reduce this problem of shortages. Someone should start a program, with city, state and federal government involved, to bring 500 or 1,000 such nurses here, and place them where they could best help. If this works out, do it annually.
We just returned from a month in the Philippines, and know of a number of good nurses who would be ideal for such a program.
Posted by hgarey2010
4th Aug 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: The primary care shortage starts now
It should be becoming clear, even to committed leftists, that there is a vast difference between having insurance "coverage," which is really all Obamacare promises, and "treatment," which means actually being seen and treated by a doctor. Sure, everyone will be "covered," but if there aren't enough doctors or if many doctors refuse to accept patients who carry low-reimbursement insurance, as with Medicaid and Medicare, then of what value is this "coverage?" Of course, the left will counter by demonizing "greedy doctors," then Katie Couric and the rest of the media wing of the Democrat party will go to work to pump out story after story about individuals who could be cured, save for avaricious doctors who won't accept Obamasurance! The tears will flow, the heartstrings will be tugged, and it's at that point the Democrats will demand legislation that makes it illegal for doctors refuse treatment to ANYONE, regardless of coverage, with swift and heavy retribution for anyone who does so because that's the way the left rolls.
Posted by DJJazzyJeff
4th Aug 2010
0 Votes
+ -
Roughly 50% of NHS doctors are not native to Britain
It really says something about a country when there's such a dearth
of native citizens seemingly unwilling to enter a supposedly high
demand. It's not as though Britain is some cultural or economic
backwater where no native talent or infrastructure for training it
exists. They're importing their doctors the way we import farm
workers.

It shouldn't take an economist to figure out why.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
4th Aug 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: The primary care shortage starts now
as if any of this should surprise anyone in this entitlement society
Posted by hwwgandolf@...
4th Aug 2010
0 Votes
+ -
DJJazzyJeff
The shortage is only in primary care, because all the economic
incentives for many years were for specialized care. Specialists
make a lot more, because they can charge a lot more. In a
normal market prices would have adjusted with the shift in
demand (which began a while ago) but insurance companies
lacked the power to control those costs. They have it now.

Blaming the current Administration for a market artifact it had no
hand in making doesn't help anyone. Finding solutions to the
problem can help.

So you want to exclude people for pre-existing conditions?
Posted by DanaBlankenhorn
4th Aug 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: The primary care shortage starts now
First off, healthcare should not be a business proposition, it
should be efficient and fair for all. Healthcare is a right, you
should not have rich people buy a transplant liver away from a
less rich person, like Steve Jobs did. He is humanly not more
important than a mother of two young children.
Civilized countries pay their doctors reasonably well, give them
status and keep the cost of education within bounds. Some
countries use all private insurers to pay for this and the premiums
are paid for by the patients, all patients also the ones that are
young and healthy. That is the principle of insurance as Ben
Franklin promoted in the case of home and fire insurance. (Was
Ben Franklin an American? or a wild eyed socialist?). Some
countries have a government option, which in reality is always
handled by a private insurer. In the minds of the citizens of
civilized countries the word socialistic is not applicable, most of
those countries know that you have to handle this as is outlined
above. Only America has this stupid approach of Medicare,
where you insure the older, all more sick than the younger and
the Veteran's Administration where all patients are sick. Those
two are really an abomination (and I love Medicare).
The solution: simple, Medicare for all and allow the VA to
negotiate about meds and doctors, they are good at it, they are
tough, Marine tough.
Do you all know that Medicare is not allowed to negotiate on
meds, congress made a law against it. Do you think they were
influenced by the pharmacy lobby?
Posted by jackvandijk
4th Aug 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: The primary care shortage starts now
Are you kidding me? More nurses from the Phillipines and a government program to bring them here? With as many US citizen as therr are out of work right now I'd rather see the effort go to training current citizens. Nursing training can be completed in a relatively short time.
Posted by outlawmom
4th Aug 2010
0 Votes
+ -
This is laughable...
The problem is Medicare/Medicaid, (government paid health care). Because the government writes the law - they can make it legal to not pay a care giver, (an medical provider), what they bill for care.

Let's say the government makes it illegal to sell a $32,000 Ford to someone who make less than $20K per year. Instead, Ford has to sell to those people the same car for $8,000 with all the same financing/rebates, etc.. If Ford attempts to collect more or doesn't sell enough at $8,000 the government will step in and Ford will be shut down.

How long would it take for Ford to have problems? How long would it take for stock holders to no longer invest in Ford?

You might say, in this example, that the investors/stockholders are your doctors.

Looking for an answer??? Start by paying your providers a wage that is good enough to bring those with the skills to the plate! Need I make an example of pro-sports to fit the same scenario?!
Posted by GuntherGump
4th Aug 2010
0 Votes
+ -
I'll go this far with you Dana; you're right on one point.
This entails hard choices.

This is true. However, here's the problem: Politicians have
never been good at hard choices .

If that was the case, Social Security would be fiscally sound, and
Freddie/Fannie never would have crashed.

If our "leaders" were unable to make the obvious and necessary
hard choices to save those relatively simple problems, it's
certain folly to believe that they are capable of doing any better
with a problem as huge, complex, and emotional as managing
health care for an entire nation.

BTW: You've done it again; speaking through your straw man for
me. I've never said there should be no "common pool". I think
"single payer" is inevitable, as bad as it is going to be. Please
stop telling me what I support. You clearly do not know.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
4th Aug 2010
0 Votes
+ -
GuntherGump
How do you think it's possible for Canada, Europe, and Japan to
assure themselves quality care, longer lives than we have, at a
fraction of the GDP we pay to cover so few people?

Are the citizens of every other advanced country better than we
are? Smarter? More honest? Are their governments less
corruptible?

I don't think so. But, yes, it entails making hard choices. I wrote
about one such hard choice in the PROVENGE piece, but none
of the brave critics felt like weighing in.

Because hard choices are hard. Not just for politicians.
Posted by DanaBlankenhorn
4th Aug 2010
0 Votes
+ -
Just who'd want to work for a system like this?
"Millions spent on doctor 'gagging orders' by NHS, investigation
finds a combination of pay-offs and fear is preventing
whistleblowers going public with criticisms over care"

http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-
news/millions-spent-on-doctor-gagging-orders-by-nhs-
investigation-finds-2041209.html

The stuff we do read about the NHS is bad enough. One
wonders how bad it must really be if the government is paying
doctors not to go public. How long will it be before this will be
SOP in America?
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
6th Aug 2010
0 Votes
+ -
JohnMcGrew@...
There has been an attempt made on this thread to imply that the
English and French and Germans and Dutch are being ripped
off, that somehow they're paying more than studies show they are
paying, and there is some rebellion against health care systems
going on which will lead people to where we were heading a few
months ago.

That's simply false.

The primary care shortage can be dealt with in many ways. More
use of PAs and RNs. Making the physician the top of a medical
home pyramid, rather than someone you must see whenever you
cough. More use of health IT so best practices are at the
bedside, and decisions can be safely audited. Paying generalists
more and specialists less.

But to use the current market reality as an excuse to pretend lies
are truth and truth lies, that's ideological propaganda. That's no
different than what the Cubans do. Freedom is wasted on people
who prefer lies to truth.
Posted by DanaBlankenhorn
7th Aug 2010
0 Votes
+ -
Once again, the pot calls the kettle black.
What is simply false is your assertion that our health care
problems will go away by adopting the principles that are already
failing in other countries.

In Britain, the government itself runs the hospitals and employs
the doctors. We?ve all heard scare stories about how that works in
practice; these stories are false. Paul Krugman

Now that's simple propaganda.

You are doing your agenda a disservice by denying and not
addressing those issues. In fact, by not addressing them, the
advocates of these systems virtually guarantee that we'll suffer
similar fates.

But at least I can agree with "Freedom is wasted on people
who prefer lies to truth." People who so easily give their freedom
away never deserved it in the first place.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
10th Aug 2010
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet Community and join the conversation! Signing-up is free and quick, Do it now, we want to hear your opinion.