Follow this blog:
RSS

Swine flu asks the hard policy questions

By | July 14, 2009, 9:44 AM PDT

A1N1, originally dubbed “swine flu” due to alleged links with a Mexican pork production facility, is now starting to ask policymakers hard questions about reform and proper access to drugs.

The World Health Organization now deems the flu “unstoppable,” meaning quarantines are no longer considered effective in limiting its spread.

Thus the issue has become one of vaccines.

The U.S. government has already committed almost $2 billion to that fight. The latest contracts, worth $884 million, are for vaccine ingredients. About $1 billion was committed to research in May.

While rich countries are going full speed ahead to vaccine all who might be at risk, with some parents asking whether they will bother, WHO Director-General Margaret Chan is asking deeper questions, like who will get a limited supply of vaccine, and how to we assure the largest supply.

Health care workers should be first in line, she says, followed by the people at greatest risk — pregnant women, people with complicating health conditions, and small children with limited immunity.

But the first vaccine won’t be approved until year-end, and even then there won’t be enough. Patent rights are needed to fight the fast-mutating virus, she says, giving new impetus to the study of past epidemics.

Some Americans, and I have been one of them, still insist this is just the flu, scientists are finding that this flu replicates inside the lungs in ways that remind them of the 1918 pandemic that killed millions. The ability of this flu to incubate for years before striking is also frightening.

All this is going to ask some hard questions of those engaged in the search for health reform: Money talks. It must talk in the search for cures, and it will talk in deciding who is vaccinated.

So should money be the determining factor in how long you live or when you die?

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Dana Blankenhorn

About Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn was a contributing editor for SmartPlanet from 2009 to 2010.

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn

Contributing Editor, Healthcare

Dana Blankenhorn has written for the Chicago Tribune, Advertising Age's "NetMarketing" supplement and founded the Interactive Age Daily for CMP Media. He holds degrees from Rice and Northwestern universities. He is based in Atlanta.

Follow him on Twitter.

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn has been a technology reporter since 1982, a business reporter since 1978, and a writer for as long as he can remember. His Schwab IRA has a few tech stocks in it, most notably some Intel and Applied Materials bought over 10 years ago. But the vast majority of his tiny fortune (emphasis on the word tiny) is invested in mutual funds. He presently writes for no one else but ZDNet, SmartPlanet and himself. But if you've got an opportunity let him know. If he takes the gig he"ll first add it to this disclosure page.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

1
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Facilities versus IT
We have been living in Montana for the past 5 years and I am not supri sexshop to find it #3 on the "worst" list. Considering a sexy shopmove to Idaho to escapthe high cost of living a low income in MT. There may not be a sales tax here but they get you if you own property!
Posted by marquesthomas
24th Jul
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet Community and join the conversation! Signing-up is free and quick, Do it now, we want to hear your opinion.