Follow this blog:
RSS

Predibirth: birth simulators cut back on emergency C-sections

By | December 13, 2011, 12:51 AM PST

Planned caesareans are about 7 times less likely to result in complications, compared with emergency C-sections.

And now, doctors can predict if women might have difficulty giving birth, so they can offer them planned operations instead. New Scientist reports.

Some doctors measure the size of the pelvis to estimate how difficult birth might be (a technique called pelvimetry), but this doesn’t take into account the shape of the baby’s head or the curvature of the mother’s pelvis.

“If you have a small pelvis, it doesn’t necessarily mean that you can’t deliver, and even women with a large pelvis may need mechanical help,” says study researcher Olivier Ami of Université Paris-Sud. “The question is: can that fetus pass through that pelvis?”

  1. First, they take an MRI scan of a pregnant woman’s pelvis while the baby is in her body.
  2. Then they create a 3D reconstruction of the pelvis and model 72 different trajectories the baby might take as it rotates and squeezes its way through the birth canal.
  3. The model scores the woman’s chances of having an uncomplicated birth based on the simulations.

Watch a groovy video of a simulated baby navigating around a pelvis.

They tested their technique using their software called Predibirth and MRI scans taken of 24 women before they gave birth.

  • All 13 who had vaginal deliveries were given a high probability of an uncomplicated birth.
  • 3 of the 5 women who needed an emergency C-section were flagged as high risk.
  • 2 of the 3 women who elected to have caesarians were scored as high risk.
  • And then 3 women had their deliveries assisted with a vacuum device.

“The idea is to transform the majority of emergency C-sections into planned ones,” Ami says.

The work was presented at the Radiological Society of North America meeting in Chicago at the end of last month.

From New Scientist.

Image: Predibirth

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Janet Fang

About Janet Fang

Janet Fang is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Janet Fang

Janet Fang
Contributing Editor

Janet Fang has written for Nature, Discover and the Point Reyes Light. She is currently a lab technician at Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory. She holds degrees from the University of California, Berkeley and Columbia University. She is based in New York.

Follow her on Twitter.

Janet Fang

Janet Fang

Janet does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what she covers.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
The discussion hasn’t started yet. Why don’t you begin it?
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!