Follow this blog:
RSS

McDonalds can win the fast food health fight

By | June 28, 2010, 7:45 AM PDT

Who is the most popular object of ridicule on YouTube today?

Is it the President? Osama bin Laden? A World Cup referee?

No, it’s McDonald’s.

The video above, a 20-year old Happy Meal commercial, is from happier times. Today you’re more likely to see Ronald McDonald portrayed as a zombie, a demon, or just physically abusive.

There’s a method to the madness, a growing public backlash against McDonald’s, driven in part by health advocates, and culminating last week in the Center for Science in the Public Interest threatening to sue the company over its Happy Meals.

This follows by less than a month a decision by Santa Clara County in California to ban Happy Meals. The ordinance sets calorie (460) and salt (600 mg) limits for meals that can be promoted with toys as premiums.

The effort has drawn instant pushback, both from local reporters and conservatives angry over a big company being pushed around.

But regular readers of this blog know the issue goes beyond McDonald’s, to the idea of cartoons being used to sell unhealthy choices, and to the unhealthiness of fast food diets.

McDonald’s tried to dodge all this by making apple slices an option, next to french fries, in its meals. Its opponents are calling that a dodge.

The answer here does not likely sit with legislators or law courts. It lies with McDonald’s taking up the carrot being offered  in Santa Clara and seizing an opportunity.

It would not be hard to get Happy Meals inside the Santa Clara law. Make low fat milk the standard drink, cut back a bit on salting the fries, and you’re done. McDonald’s might make up for any loss by adding premiums (for teens or adults) to larger meals geared to bigger bodies.

If you think it’s crazy to imagine a 40 year old buying the equivalent of a Happy Meal, you haven’t been to a ballgame and watched some dad dig around a box of Cracker Jack looking for the prize.

McDonald’s actually has tried to be a good corporate citizen in the past. It added salads to its menu. It complied with labeling laws. Look at its international operations and you’ll see it following a host of dietary and marketing rules set by culture and government around the world.

In other words, this doesn’t have to become a conflict. It’s a challenge for food science to mass produce healthier meals in ways that can be loaded on trucks and delivered by teenagers. But it’s not an impossible challenge.

My guess is that, at some point this summer, McDonald’s will take that up. The pressure will remain, but this is not going to turn into a war between fast food and health.

The company that can deliver a healthy fast food meal is going to make a lot of money and earn a lot of goodwill. McDonald’s puts more money into research than any company in its industry. I think they can do it.

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Dana Blankenhorn

About Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn was a contributing editor for SmartPlanet from 2009 to 2010.

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn

Contributing Editor, Healthcare

Dana Blankenhorn has written for the Chicago Tribune, Advertising Age's "NetMarketing" supplement and founded the Interactive Age Daily for CMP Media. He holds degrees from Rice and Northwestern universities. He is based in Atlanta.

Follow him on Twitter.

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn has been a technology reporter since 1982, a business reporter since 1978, and a writer for as long as he can remember. His Schwab IRA has a few tech stocks in it, most notably some Intel and Applied Materials bought over 10 years ago. But the vast majority of his tiny fortune (emphasis on the word tiny) is invested in mutual funds. He presently writes for no one else but ZDNet, SmartPlanet and himself. But if you've got an opportunity let him know. If he takes the gig he"ll first add it to this disclosure page.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
32
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
RE: McDonalds can win the fast food health fight
Don't try to legislate good parenting, here's a great concept when your child whines for a Happy meal, say NO! Too many children in this day and age grow up thinking they can have everything they want. It comes as a shock to them when they enter the workplace and have to perform because of all of the political correctness telling them grades don't matter and everyone is equal. Too bad the death of common sense came along and no one will take a stand on sound parenting.
Posted by geoff@...
28th Jun 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: McDonalds can win the fast food health fight
let us get rid of this stupid urban myth that salt in the diet of persons with a normal metabolism has any deleterious effect. that has never been a controlled clinical study that has shown this to be true.

it is improper to fill the comments with this kind of stupid knowledge(?) for those who are ignorant of the facts.. the result if this may be reducing the salt intake of many to unsafe levels. this has been the result of many possible diet reforms in the past when used by the untrained and ignorant.
Posted by stilt21
28th Jun 2010
0 Votes
+ -
It is easier to critize than to do the correct thing
Parents should be the ones being informed on what is alternative eating habits are needed for children. All the active groups just looking for happy things in parents childhood to bring down. Although we all have things in common, everyone is different.

Most media people only see what they want to see. There are a lot of active slimmer children in the world, Promoting a more acitve lifestyle will be show that there is a way to lose weight and maintain healthy children can be more fun than diet. If parents do not make sure their children are active when young, they will not be active as teens or adults. Single or both parents working, tv, video games, etc are too easy a solution. Playing outside, parks, zoo's etc are necessary for a child's development to adulthood. And should be promoted and not legislated by people that think they know more about raising your child that you do. Treating people like children is not the way to get what your want to happen.
Posted by DadsPad
28th Jun 2010
0 Votes
+ -
geoff@..
Good parenting is not the issue. Good corporate citizenship is. But
you do sound like my dad. He'd be 89 now and I miss him.
Posted by DanaBlankenhorn
28th Jun 2010
0 Votes
+ -
stilt21
Please stop spreading falsehoods on this blog. The question is not
whether salt is good -- it is. But too much salt is bad, very bad. And
Americans are now consuming twice the salt of 30 years ago, driven
by the decisions of food manufacturers who are subject to FDA
regulation.
Posted by DanaBlankenhorn
28th Jun 2010
0 Votes
+ -
DadsPad
I think y'all missed an important point, which is how McDonald's
can get ahead of this and actually gain market share.

Look, they offer extra salt, in packets, at every McDonald's. If you
want more, take more. For the rest, shake the shaker a little less,
or make the holes in the shaker smaller, and the salt problem is
largely solved.

As to the drink problem, did you know that YooHoo is made with
whey? That's what is left of milk after cheese is made. Concoct a
fat free chocolatey drink that's high in vitamins, and you can not
only use it in cute containers for Happy Meals but as the basis of
your frozen custard as well.

All this requires testing in a food lab, but McDonald's, as I
indicated, has one of the biggest and best in the industry.
Posted by DanaBlankenhorn
28th Jun 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: McDonalds can win the fast food health fight
Though I do think sound parenting and common sense should increase. I do agree that McDonald's could certainly use this as an opportunity to improve their food. I prefer quality over cheapest possible. For too long cheap has been the rule and we end up with salt, corn syrup, sugar, hormones, pesticides, & preservatives added to everything. We don't all that in everything we eat. Sure it makes things cheap, but in the long run increases our health care costs and needs. So corporations in the food industry should start going for healthy additions and changes, even if they cost more. I think most people would appreciate the quality improvement.
Posted by gcomputeronet@...
28th Jun 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: McDonalds can win the fast food health fight
I eat at McDonald's once a year. I can't afford to eat out much.
Give me all the salt, grease, sugar and anything else yummy that I
pay for. And I grab extra salt too.

This year had that 1/3 pounder Angus burger. It was excellent.

Everything in moderation. I enjoy my meal like I have for decades
and I'll see you Mac; next year.
Posted by Cape Cod Richie
28th Jun 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: McDonalds can win the fast food health fight
We are too uptight. McDonalds should be a treat. Anything is bad
in excess...so don't let your kids eat McDonalds to excess.
Simple. There should be no legislation regarding this at all. Their
food isn't poisonous for gods sake and if you think it is than
maybe you are a hypochondriac who doesn't believe that people
are responsible for their own actions, or maybe you think you are
"more correct" than others. Hurray for companies that make
healthy stuff, people enjoy it, and the company succeeds and
shame on anyone who is believes that is a bad way to operate
because you want to make other people's choices for them.
Posted by jdawgnoonan
28th Jun 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: McDonalds can win the fast food health fight
Parents have never been able to totally control the environment today's children live in. Nor have they been able to say "NO" to everything their children might want, whether it be a particular toy or a McDonald's Happy Meal. Good parenting is much more difficult than some seem to understand.

Besides, parents should not have to bare the burden completely by themselves when it comes to the health of their children. We live in communities of people, which include businesses. All who make and sell food to each of us, and our children especially, should be charged with the responsibility for making healthy consumable products. A parent should not be forced to continually say "NO" to his or her child. Being forced into that position simply highlights the fact that forces outside the family are not very concerned about the effect of "their actions" on the family. And that, my friends, is not good citizenship! Whether it be McDonald's or any other food seller, they (who are we) should never live our lives at the expense of others.
Posted by mustang_z
29th Jun 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: McDonalds can win the fast food health fight
Dana, perhaps I was not as clear in my point as I should have been. yes there may be a call to McDonald's for good corporate citizenship, but should the government really have that much control over what I chose to eat? I am quite capable of making such choices for myself and family. Why not go after restaurants that serve Fugu, people die from eating it as well when it is not properly prepared. Yes there is salt in fast food and I believe the all knowing government is starting to look to regulate salt used in restaurant foods as well. Where does government regulation stop and personal responsibility take over? We have become a nation of sheep, all too soon we will be living in the world of "Idiocracy" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idiocracy. Please, stop pushing that the government has to make all of our decisions for us; that means special interest with their agenda rules. For each lawsuit like this at least one commercial group stands to benefit. When does the government control stop once it starts?
Posted by geoff@...
29th Jun 2010
0 Votes
+ -
Cape Cod Richie
If McDonald's had to depend on you it would go under. I think you
know that. Their food is designed to be eaten every day, or at least
several times a week. That's the business model.

Given that they have both an opportunity and an obligation to
respond.
Posted by DanaBlankenhorn
29th Jun 2010
0 Votes
+ -
geoff@..
I take it you're a rational actor in the market. I believe producers
are also rational, that they respond to incentives. This is an
incentive for McDonald's to make some needed changes.

You seem to think that the government has no role in our food
decisions today. On this you are totally, 100% wrong. Not wrong
as in I disagree with your opinion, wrong in terms of the facts.

Our present food system is the product of decades of
government policy, primarily through the Department of
Agriculture, favoring quantity over quality, protein over
vegetables, mass production over local.

Change the policy and you change incentives. Change the
incentives and you change the market.

Please don't deny there is no policy, that government has no role
today in what we eat. It has a massive role, and a lot of policies.
And, yes, that agenda is now driven by many private interests,
which have long benefited from the policy as it has evolved to
what it is today.

We have the power to change it if we only have the will to do so.
And the life you save may be your own.
Posted by DanaBlankenhorn
29th Jun 2010
0 Votes
+ -
Woah woah
We can all agree that McDonalds is bad for you, but that's where
personal responsibility and good parenting come into play. It isn't
the role of the government to legislate healthy habits into our
families, it's the role of the parents to teach good habits. I don't
need a nanny in the form of the Government.
Posted by Michael Alan Goff
29th Jun 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: McDonalds can win the fast food health fight
Dana, I do believe the government has a role at the highest levels. The FDA has been great in helping the US get where it is today. However at what level does the regulation get to be too much? Yes McDonald's uses Happy Meal toys as an incentive, sell to the kids and get the parents business. I just do not agree with micromanaging all fast food or other restaurant decisions. Board of health yes to ensure proper conditions, but come on it's a toy. Would I like to see better food choices at McDonalds? Yes, and they do change their menu. On corporate citizenship they did get rid of Super Size; other fast food did not. So they do act but it is like herding cats it takes a lot of work to get them to go where you want. The best incentive is to buy your food elsewhere, that will cause change. I don't need the government to tell me that, government intervention for safety, quality, etc. equals good. Government intervention on a marketing incentive equals bad.
Posted by geoff@...
29th Jun 2010
0 Votes
+ -
You are missing an opportunity
Look at all us fat people. Look at the 20% of our population that smokes. Look at those of us who, OMG, eat meat. Look at all of us who just do not exercise enough and all the rest of us who do not fit your utopian view of life. The best thing to do is just let us all die off by denying us health care, then you can enjoy your tofu, humus and drugs in peace.
Posted by MikeBytes@...
29th Jun 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: McDonalds can win the fast food health fight
OMG I had these. The sight of a chicken mcnugget makes me
want to cry now. I don't even think Mc Donalds really qualifies as
food anymore.
Posted by sanud002
29th Jun 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: McDonalds can win the fast food health fight
I have two sons working at McDonald's. The oldest was overweight when he started working there and within a few months had lost 25 pounds. The other son has always been skinny and still is. I was with him at the doctor today when he had his blood pressure checked 93/69. HIs favorite food - french fries with plenty of salt. The point - McDonald's food does not automatically make you fat or hypertensive. There are other factors like inactivity. Make the streets and playgrounds safer for kids to play outdoors and you will see healthier, less overweight children. Stop picking on restaurants. We like fast food because are lives are so rushed we don't have time for a sit-down restaurant or home cooking. We could probably work on that as well.
Posted by silverg50
29th Jun 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: McDonalds can win the fast food health fight
Please. They have the low fat milk and apple slices as an option already and it's not at all difficult to order it ("Hamburger Happy Meal with Apple Slices and lowfat milk". My god, the effort that takes.). The kids typically don't want it. They want the tastier sweeter/fatty/salty stuff. This is a case where parents need to step up and be parents, not to have the state (or McDonalds for that matter) do it for them.

Also, if the backlash were that severe I think their sales would be suffering badly. This is the loud whining of a small minority.
Posted by sullivanjc
29th Jun 2010
0 Votes
+ -
geoff@...
Right now, I do think that government's role should be more focused
on the supply of healthy food at reasonable prices than the demand
side. But we can reduce salt without impacting taste. And we can
fight obesity. If we choose to.
Posted by DanaBlankenhorn
29th Jun 2010
0 Votes
+ -
sullivanjc
If you would follow the links you would find that McDonald's
restaurants don't often offer the "low fat alternatives, like the milk
and the apple slices. They fill orders with the corn syrup drinks and
french fries routinely.

You're right. This is the whining of a minority. A minority that's
interested in your health. Professionals in the field. People who are
paid to know stuff. You know, sources.
Posted by DanaBlankenhorn
29th Jun 2010
0 Votes
+ -
Hardee's beats out McDonald's
With their huge "Monster" burger, Hardee's has the national "gut-buster" (pun intended) weighing in at over 1,300 calories!
Moderation people - that's what is needed.
Posted by JTF243@...
29th Jun 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: McDonalds can win the fast food health fight
@ Dana Blankenhorn

I did follow the link to the USA today article. I don't see why McDonalds should be forced into pushing the healthy alternative as the default when the healthy alternative is not what most people go to McDonalds for. It actually costs money and increases the amount of time consumers wait if they push one alternative as a default when 3/4 of the time that's not what the customer wants. Typically, you want your default to be the most common choice. That's what's cost effective (and this is, after all, a business)

McDonalds has provided many healthy alternatives. They've even advertised some in the past heavily and had them be spectacular flops anyway.

Health care professionals have also done their due diligence as far as telling people what is healthy and what is not. People clearly don't care that much. If they did, they'd order the salad (without dressing). The government needs to stop trying to fix stupid.
Posted by sullivanjc
29th Jun 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: McDonalds can win the fast food health fight
Its true that the government today has a role in food. It should not. The reason bad food sometimes costs less than good food (though not on a nutritional basis) is that the government subsidizes the cost of unhealthy food to support producers who then pay it handsome dividends. For example, the government subsidizes corn syrup, used in all manner of food.
Posted by pranavb99@...
29th Jun 2010
0 Votes
+ -
Dana
It is the job of the health professionals to tell us this, and it's our
choice whether or not we do. That's what this is all about, choice.
Parents choose to make the wrong decision, kids choose to eat
massive amounts of this stuff when there is plenty of information out
there that this is bad for you. It's all about choice.

Once you try to force good, healthy, choices, it ceases to be a good
choice. It becomes the Government living your life for you.
Posted by Michael Alan Goff
29th Jun 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: McDonalds can win the fast food health fight
when gov. dictates lifestyle we will all forever be slaves.
Posted by butchiester
30th Jun 2010
0 Votes
+ -
Y'all are missing the point
I know some here love to bash government, and assume anything
government is saying or doing must be bad, because government
is "them" and I guess BP is "us."

But the post really had very little to do with the government, or
government policy.

McDonald's has a great business opportunity in front of it, one
private health activists and one local government are trying to
move the company toward.

Smaller holes on the salt shaker and a YooHoo-like drink instead
of soda would leave you with a much happier Happy Meal. No
government intervention necessary. Big profits. You can even
raise the price.

Yet just mentioning that government is interested in this goal gets
the knees to jerking.

It's sad.

You know, if government policy on the question hadn't changed,
42% or more of us would be smoking cigarettes right now.
Sheesh!
Posted by DanaBlankenhorn
30th Jun 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: McDonalds can win the fast food health fight
McDonalds is in the business of providing to the lowest common denominator - providing appealing food for the lowest cost possible, such that healthiness and other factors go by the wayside.

The demographic that McD's is interested in doing business with DOES NOT value their health as much as many of us here do.

As people begin to realize the benefits of eating healthy, health-oriented fast food places are becoming more common, and McD's can either try to capture some of that market, or continue to appeal to a dwindling number of the types mentioned above.

That is ultimately their decision.

Unfortunately, healthy food comes with a higher price, as anyone who's looked into the "natural" or "organic" foods section in a grocery store can attest. So lower socio-economic status folks cannot always afford the highest quality healthiest tastiest food. I am in support of government helping encourage healthy eating, but ultimately it cannot force this upon people.

Usually, the more of the following you find in foods, the higher the cost rises:
- High calorie (energy density)
- Good taste
- Healthiness (nutrient density)

The good taste is usually the last to be sacrificed.

Dana:

You are foolish to assume that government policy was the catalyst behind the decline in cigarette smoking - public awareness came first and drove that government policy. Public awareness and desire must come first in the move to healthier food as well.
Posted by pjb663
30th Jun 2010
0 Votes
+ -
API in India
you want API in india plz visit@ http://tinyurl.com/2ar6g5a
Posted by suryaph
1st Jul 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: McDonalds can win the fast food health fight
In my opinion, MacDonalds is for lazy people, fat people, and spoiled kids. I don't have any children, and if I did. They wouldn't see the inside of a fast food restaurant. Until they were at least 12 years old. I figure by then, they would be in a better position. To make intelligent food choices. I take care of a handicapped person. And I cook, and i enjoy cooking. Children should start learning how to cook, at a young age. And that doesn't mean frozen dinners, hot dogs, pizza, Vienna sausage, sardines, and other slop. I am talking about a meat, vegetables, salad, low fat dessert, and a beverage such as low fat milk. A lot of adults should not be going to a fast food restaurant, but rather a walking track.
Posted by blackjack861@...
1st Jul 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: McDonalds can win the fast food health fight
If you don't want to be fat stop eating fatty foods. McDonalds provides a service and you have a choice. Stop blaming your obesity on anything other than choosing fattening food. It's not my fault I'm fat it's McDonalds fault...I had no idea that smoking was bad for me it's the cigarette company's fault. It's not my fault I didn't make my kids do their homework, it's the schools.

I'm tired of Americans blaming everyone else but themselves for the choices they make. Take some personal responsibility. If you are fat, it's your fault. If you have smoker's lung, it's your fault. If you're lazy, it's your fault. If you are ignorant, it's your fault...stop blaming anyone else. Take control of your life and you'll be a lot better off.
Posted by bowened
2nd Jul 2010
0 Votes
+ -
bowened
So Americans lost their collective minds over the last 30-odd years, and the obesity rate suddenly doubled, because we all made irrational choices at the same time?

That doesn't hold with me. I think Americans are rational and intelligent. I think they responded to signals from the market, a market controlled largely by companies like McDonald's who have not been told to make healthy food, and by suppliers like ADM and Smithfield reacting to subsidies in government agriculture policies.

Change the supply equation, change the market and people will respond. I wrote in this piece that McDonald's has an opportunity to get ahead of this problem, if it chooses to do so. (I even described in broad brush how to save their highly profitable Happy Meal.)

But there's a limit to what McDonald's can do until our policies regarding food supply change, until subsidies are removed from the production of unhealthy calories and moved toward the production of more healthy ones.
Posted by DanaBlankenhorn
8th Jul 2010
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!