Follow this blog:
RSS

Is the field of obesity drugs dead?

By | February 1, 2011, 1:47 PM PST

Yesterday, the Food and Drug Administration rejected yet another weight-loss drug – the third one in these last few months.

Contrave from Orexigen Therapeutics and partner Takeda Pharmaceutical was denied approval over its potential heart risks. Had it been approved, it would be the first new prescription diet pill in more than 10 years.

The drug now joins Arena Pharmaceuticals‘ lorcaserin and Vivus‘ Qnexa – which were both turned down in October. But unlike the other two, Contrave was endorsed by a panel of expert advisers in December.

This prompted Forbes’ The Medicine Show to write: “the field of obesity drugs is effectively dead… The clear lesson is that weight-loss medicines simply do not have enough of a benefit to justify any risk – and that this makes getting them approved just about impossible.”

Contrave tablets are supposed to boost metabolism while curbing appetite and cravings – by combining the anti-addiction drug naltrexone with antidepressant bupropion. It was submitted for regulatory approval in March 2010 based on multiple clinical trials involving more than 4500 people.

About 35% of those patients with obesity lost at least 5% of their starting weight within one year, but they also experienced increased blood pressure and pulse rates [Reuters].

“We are surprised and extremely disappointed…” says Orexigen president and CEO, Michael Narachi, who wishes to work with the FDA on “next steps.”

These next steps include a large clinical study on its cardiovascular risks. The letter from the FDA specified: “before your application can be approved, you must conduct a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of sufficient size and duration to demonstrate that the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in overweight and obese subjects treated with naltrexone/bupropion does not adversely affect the drug’s benefit-risk profile.”

This could take up to 6 years and $200 million.

WSJ reports:

Obesity is widespread and a risk factor for many serious health issues, but the FDA has shown a high bar for drugs that would be taken indefinitely by millions of patients, many of whom don’t have any current health problems.

Past failures – including the fen-phen combination that led to heart-valve problems in some patients – serve as a reminder that safety is the primary concern at the agency.

Abbott Laboratories removed its weight-loss drug Meridia from the market last year under FDA pressure, with the agency saying the “very modest weight loss” from taking Meridia didn’t justify its cardiovascular risk.

Shares of Orexigen traded down 71% to $2.62 from Monday’s close of $9.09, and the move has erased more than $300 million in market value from the stock.

Weight-loss drugs on the market now include Roche’s prescription Xenical and GlaxoSmithKline’s OTC Alli – both can cause serious liver problems, uncontrolled bowel movements and gas.

Image: pills by e-MagineArt.com via Flickr

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Janet Fang

About Janet Fang

Janet Fang is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Janet Fang

Janet Fang
Contributing Editor

Janet Fang has written for Nature, Discover and the Point Reyes Light. She is currently a lab technician at Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory. She holds degrees from the University of California, Berkeley and Columbia University. She is based in New York.

Follow her on Twitter.

Janet Fang

Janet Fang

Janet does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what she covers.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
4
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Is the field of obesity drugs dead?
This was the comment I posted to Matthew Herper of Forbes
regarding his assertion that the obesity drug field is "dead":

I find it remarkable today, especially in the world if finance and
investing, which is the perspective from which Forbes analyzes
the world, that short-sightedness is so prevalent and obvious.
The FDA rejection of Orexigen?s Contrave, despite the December
2010 panel recommendation, does indeed represent (at least)
the third blow to obesity drugs to have occurred in 2010. But, to
make the leap of judgment that the obesity drug market is
?dead?? There are currently no fewer than seven (7)obesity
drugs on the market internationally, thirteen (13) drugs in
preclinicals/Phase I trials, three (3) drugs in Phase II trials, and
two drugs in Phase III trials, if you exclude Contrave, which
Orexigen CERTAINLY does not intend to give up on. To conclude
that because three drugs have run into regulatory challenges,
while ignoring both the number of drugs still under evaluation and
the latent (read ?huge?) demand for a drug alternative to surgery
or device interventions reflects more of a need for headlines than
legitimate consideration of the facts (or the interests of those
rare, long-term oriented investors).

And who gives a whit that ?Contrave and Qnexa are not even
really entirely new drugs?? Name one investor who wouldn?t want
to have a share of even a handful of the drugs that have become
blockbusters for indications they were never intended. Perhaps
you?ve heard of viagra or minoxidil?

I applaud you for your headline-making, but I recommend you go
back and do a bit more research on the future pipeline and likely
investment/development activity in obesity drugs before you
declare this patient ?dead?.
Posted by patrickdriscoll
2nd Feb 2011
0 Votes
+ -
Question the objectivity of the FDA
The name "Doctor No" would seem to fit the FDA well.

Sometime "no" is the right answer. However, there are surely cases where they are a bit overprotective. When it is truly protective of health, that's fine. If it is protective of their practices and profits, that is a problem. Take a look at happened with product approval of MelaFind (MELA).
Posted by pwatson
2nd Feb 2011
0 Votes
+ -
FDA good for some thing..
It is good to see the FDA protecting us from sliding further down the pill for every problem slope.

Most weight issues are behavioral based, so unless you can force people to take a pill to suppress those issues you are not going see much of an impact from these drugs even if they do work.

It is well proven you cannot force a psychopath to take medication to cure their problems.
Posted by Hates Idiots
2nd Feb 2011
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Is the field of obesity drugs dead?
Good for the FDA. It's about time we stop turning towards pills to
solve our obesity problem. The medical world today seems to be
revolving around the "pill for every ill mentality," Maybe doctors
should stop prescribing patients pills for obesity and instead
PRESCRIBING a basket of fruits and vegetables a day. Instead of
going to the drug store and paying $25 for medicine, maybe they
should head to the supermarket and buy some fruits and
vegetables instead! The food supply in this country is a joke and
now pharmaceutical companies are making money off of it. We
need to start turning away from drugs for high blood pressure
and obesity and turning back towards whole foods. The solution
is nutrition.! I write about the nutrition crisis in America on my blog
at http://www.nutritionisthesolution.com check it out!
Thanks for this post by the way,
Laurence
happy
Posted by laurencengirard
2nd Feb 2011
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!