Follow this blog:
RSS

Insurers want more of what some hospitals have

By | September 2, 2010, 9:12 AM PDT

Pricing power.

Pricing power is one of the main targets of health reform. (The Pricing Power Playbook, by Rick Ott, is one of many titles aimed at helping sellers get the highest price and profit margin on what they sell.)

Since states still regulate their markets and what policies must cover, controls on pricing may prove difficult to impose on insurers. The hope is that more open markets, provided for in the law, will change this.

But there is another form of pricing power, against which insurers have until now been powerless. This is the pricing power of hospitals.

As Forbes notes in “America’s Most Profitable Hospitals” this week, some hospitals manage profit margins of 30-50% these days, thanks to limited local competition. Insurers must pay whatever these hospitals charge, and hospitals collect one-third of all health care spending.

This is not a profit vs. non-profit story, however. Some hospitals on the list are religious and University-affiliated non-profits.

A Princeton economist contacted by Bloomberg blamed market consolidation for the big profits. He suggested anti-trust enforcement as a solution.

An accompanying investigation bore this out, in part, with the example of Sutter Health, which controls one-third of the market in the San Francisco-Sacramento corridor and can thus charge premium prices.

But a big part of health reform aims to shift this power balance.

There is a reason why United Healthcare is buying health IT companies that track where the insurer’s money goes, and why at the same time the company is rolling out new plans that dramatically limit the choice of doctors and hospitals from which patients choose.

It’s about pricing power. Know what everyone is charging and only pay for the best value. It’s what consumers would do themselves if they had the data.

The next step could be for insurers to buy hospitals and medical groups. HMO companies like Kaiser and InterMountain already own their own facilities. They choose what technologies to use, what best practices to follow, and can thus deliver high-quality care for less.

That’s not a bug in health reform. It’s a feature. For costs to be controlled someone must have pricing power on the buy side. To get a bill passed the Administration gave much of this power to insurers, while promising to impose discipline on Medicare and Medicaid more directly.

That’s not all there is to it, of course. Wellness programs, a move toward capitation or the medical home instead of fee-for-service, limiting the spread of chronic conditions, spreading the risk to everyone, these also enter into it.

But underneath everything is this issue of pricing power. When insurers control most of a state’s insurance market, they have pricing power. When hospitals control much of the health care in a region, they have pricing power.

Effective competition reduces pricing power. Big buyers can dictate to big sellers in ways little buyers cannot. Drop by your local WalMart or Costco if you don’t believe me.

While much of the focus over the next few years will be on insurers and insurance markets, expect more of insurers to speak softly and wield a big stick on the buying side of health care.

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Dana Blankenhorn

About Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn was a contributing editor for SmartPlanet from 2009 to 2010.

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn

Contributing Editor, Healthcare

Dana Blankenhorn has written for the Chicago Tribune, Advertising Age's "NetMarketing" supplement and founded the Interactive Age Daily for CMP Media. He holds degrees from Rice and Northwestern universities. He is based in Atlanta.

Follow him on Twitter.

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn has been a technology reporter since 1982, a business reporter since 1978, and a writer for as long as he can remember. His Schwab IRA has a few tech stocks in it, most notably some Intel and Applied Materials bought over 10 years ago. But the vast majority of his tiny fortune (emphasis on the word tiny) is invested in mutual funds. He presently writes for no one else but ZDNet, SmartPlanet and himself. But if you've got an opportunity let him know. If he takes the gig he"ll first add it to this disclosure page.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
2
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: Insurers want more of what some hospitals have
This is a curious list. Most of these profitable hospitals are in states that are in the bottom quartile of overall health ranking according to the Commonwealth Fund - http://www.commonwealthfund.org/Maps-and-Data/State-Scorecard-2009.aspx. Texas, Tennessee, Florida, Louisiana, Arkansas, etc.
Posted by rhedeman
3rd Sep 2010
+1 Vote
+ -
Not entirely surprising
The key variable seems to be competition. Those that can buy out
the competition, or make it appear they have none, can beat down
insurance companies and get their price.
Posted by DanaBlankenhorn
3rd Sep 2010
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!