Follow this blog:
RSS

Health technology is worthless if you don’t use it

By | July 28, 2010, 8:04 AM PDT

Willful ignorance, often spread for personal or political gain, is one of the greatest public health threats we face.

Increased dependence on medical technology makes us more susceptible to such outbreaks.

As with freedom itself the only cure is eternal vigilance and a willingness to engage when provoked.

Vaccines are among the oldest, most reliable medical technologies. They have saved lives for over a century. Dread diseases like polio are a thing of the past thanks to vaccines.

When disease disappears from living memory,  however, we become susceptible to a form of medical Luddism. The first Luddites thought they could protect their way of life by destroying factories. Today’s medical Luddites believe they can do the same thing by sowing doubt about medical technologies.

That’s not to say criticism of modern technology is always Luddism. The dangers of BPA might be unknown were it not for people willing to speak up. But it’s one thing to speak out for new science, quite another to demand adherence to pseudo-science and nonsense.

Thus a growing anti-vaccine movement has once-dread diseases making a big comeback.

The latest is whooping cough, or pertussis. (Picture from CNET TV.) A vaccine first became available in 1940 and most people have only a vague knowledge of how terrible a disease it is. It can kill.

Babies today are routinely vaccinated against pertussis but this protection wears off after 12 years. Adults should get a booster. The disease nearly disappeared because kids were the primary transmission vector.

Ignorance and forgetfulness have whooping cough making a big comeback, especially in California. A bill to subsidize vaccine has been offered, as prevention costs much less than cure.

The problem stems from an increasing number of “personal belief” vaccine waivers, parents refusing the vaccine thanks to activists like Barbara Loe Fisher, who insist the disease can’t be prevented and claims a “government cover-up” of a second bacteria is behind the outbreak.

Really? So the fact most of the counties where the disease on the rise are those with the highest rate of vaccine refusal is a coincidence? The fact that huge increases are reported in upstate New York and Arizona, where refusal is also high, is also a coincidence?

It gets worse. Some racists are already using the whooping cough epidemic to fan the flames of hate. Meanwhile officials in Texas, Florida and Michigan are expressing worry about rising refusal rates.

Turns out anti-vaccine hysteria is subject to outbreaks just like disease itself. It often starts with a single bad study, is then fanned by media flames into a rising vaccine refusal rate, which results a few years later in a higher rate of disease. It falls as reports of deaths increase.

Fact is, the anti-pertussis vaccine, which is given in combination with vaccines for diphtheria and tetanus, is safe. A recently-completed study from the CDC should put valid concerns to rest.

There is a lesson here that goes beyond whooping cough, or measles, or any other particular disease. Science is not politics. When you cover it as “he said-she said” you commit malpractice, increase the level of ignorance, and spread disease.

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Dana Blankenhorn

About Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn was a contributing editor for SmartPlanet from 2009 to 2010.

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn

Contributing Editor, Healthcare

Dana Blankenhorn has written for the Chicago Tribune, Advertising Age's "NetMarketing" supplement and founded the Interactive Age Daily for CMP Media. He holds degrees from Rice and Northwestern universities. He is based in Atlanta.

Follow him on Twitter.

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn has been a technology reporter since 1982, a business reporter since 1978, and a writer for as long as he can remember. His Schwab IRA has a few tech stocks in it, most notably some Intel and Applied Materials bought over 10 years ago. But the vast majority of his tiny fortune (emphasis on the word tiny) is invested in mutual funds. He presently writes for no one else but ZDNet, SmartPlanet and himself. But if you've got an opportunity let him know. If he takes the gig he"ll first add it to this disclosure page.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

5
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Health technology is worthless if you don't use it
Actually, vaccination has been around well over 200 years since the publication of the work of Edward Jenner in the 1790s, and widely practiced since before 1810!
Posted by CodeCurmudgeon
28th Jul 2010
0 Votes
+ -
The medical and pharmaceutical industries can blame this on themselves.
Is unfortunate how people have come to distrust doctors, medical products and pharmaceutical industry. As the whole sector becomes more profit-driven, people become increasingly skeptical and with each headline about this or that drug killing hundreds or thousands triggering class action suits left and right, a very large parts of the population have grown weary of all these mishaps often caused by lack of proper control or adequate testing because drug makers' interest in financial gains rather then medical advancement. It's not shocking that people have become suspicious although at times to a fault.

The Hippocrates oat that I've known while growing up in Europe, was considered, by doctors and patients alike, as sacred as religion and as important as one's personal honor and integrity. I recall the doctors being respected not because of the money they made, but for the nobleness of their profession and their ethic conduct. I remember researchers being interested in finding cure for this or that disease because of a genuine interest and love of their profession, not to come up with a "blockbuster" drug.

Why are we looking in astonishment at those who do not want to subject their children to a vaccine or another? Doesn't matter if a vaccine is safe, some people will oppose vaccination not because they have lost their mind, but because what has been lost is something even more valuable than reason... what it has been lost today is trust.
Posted by freakqnc
28th Jul 2010
0 Votes
+ -
Trust is indeed the issue
Trust is indeed the issue.
Three different times I have been prescribed some new drug by a doctor. One doc even went so far as to describe one of them as a 'miracle drug'. Three times, that drug was later taken off the market after it killed lots & lots of people.

Fortunately, I chose not to take two of the drugs (thank God), after researching their side effects & known drug interactions. Doctors don't tell patients these things, even when specifically asked so I've learned to do my own research before taking any drugs. I only took the 3rd one for a few days & stopped when the side effects were unacceptable.

Vaccines are no different. They're just more drugs. They're not tested any better than other drugs, sometime less because there's always a big rush to get them to market. Quality, testing & safety go right out the window. It's all about marketing & profits. Safety & effectiveness are irrelevant.

Drug companies are out to make money just like any other business & that is their one & only concern. They are not concerned with making people well. They are concerned with creating a market & making sure that you buy their ridiculously expensive products each & every day. If they can make you think you "need" their product, they just rake in more money.
Posted by qop46qop@...
29th Jul 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Health technology is worthless if you don't use it
Decay in trust is fed on all sides.

Medicine, deemed for centuries (if not millennia) to be more art than science came to be "trusted" -- apparently in the wake of the enlightenment when so much good science was performed. Government in it's appointed role did what it felt it should to protect society. Advances in information dissemination led to broader awareness among the public that just because we have the ability to discover and use something doesn't mean we should.

Corruption in government, real or apparent, combined with the open forum of the Internet, and pharma's priority on profits means that we have a cacophony that no one can trust. To counter it will require more than simply speaking loudly with claimed authority. It is going to require due diligence in the application of reason and acceptance of risk based on thorough information. I think doctors are inching their way toward that, but it's not happening fast enough.
Posted by psoucheray@...
29th Jul 2010
0 Votes
+ -
How EHRs can help
As more data goes into EHRs best practices emerge. When doctors
see these best practices on their screen, in an exam room, they can
gradually (if they choose) move toward what works rather than what
the salesman told them most recently.

Fact is most doctors think they know more than they know, and
they're encouraged in that attitude by their profession. Data can
help them just as it does everyone else.
Posted by DanaBlankenhorn
30th Jul 2010
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet Community and join the conversation! Signing-up is free and quick, Do it now, we want to hear your opinion.