Follow this blog:
RSS

Gates Foundation wants to reinvent the toilet

By | August 15, 2011, 3:54 PM PDT

The toilets of tomorrow will be able to turn crap into clean burning fuel, fertilizer, and fresh water. But how do you improve upon the venerable technology of the flush toilet?

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation has launched a “Reinvent the Toilet” competition, awarding $3 million to researchers at 8 universities.

Their challenge: use recent tech to create a stand-alone unit without piped-in water, a sewer connection, or outside electricity – all for less than 5 cents a day for a person to use.

“The present toilet is a 19th-century device that does not meet the needs of a vast part of the world’s population,” says Frank Rijsberman from the foundation. Flush toilets as we know it requires massive amounts of water and sewer infrastructure.

About 2.6 billion people without access to sewer-linked systems must use simple latrines, holes in the ground, or just the nearest available spot – which can lead to many health problems, like acute childhood diarrhea.

Watch the challenge video here. (“Let’s get our shit together…”)

From the New York Times, some cool toilet tech to ruminate on:

1. One new toilet is a compact chamber that runs on solar power from a roof panel and uses built-in electrochemical technology to process waste. Michael Hoffmann from Caltech received $400,000 to develop this solar toilet, which can be used up to 500 times a day. “We can clean the waste water up to the same level as would come out of a treatment plant,” he says.

It uses the sun’s energy to power an electrode system in the waste water; the electrodes drive a series of cleansing chemical reactions, converting organic waste in the water into carbon dioxide and producing hydrogen that can be stored in a fuel cell for night operation.

2. Another project takes a chemical engineering route: rather than composting waste for 6 months, as waterless composting toilets do, this heats the waste quickly, killing pathogens.

Katherine Foxon from the University of KwaZulu-Natal is designing waste disposal for community bathrooms in South Africa. “We’ll process the waste chemically, combusting the feces and using that energy to drive the evaporation of urine,” she says.

3. Some other groups are testing flush toilets that divert urine before it gets into the sewer. Dealing with urine separately, by siphoning it off to local storage tanks, simplifies waste water management. The urine can then be collected, treated, and recycled as fertilizer.

The Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (EAWAG) had a 6-year project on urine separation called No Mix technology. Each has a built-in urinal at the front that drains into storage, and the back compartment works like a conventional toilet with poop flushed into the sewer. (You need good aim for this to work.) EAWAG’s Tove Larsen led that project.

4. Larsen is also a Gates Foundation winner, but this time, she’ll be leading a team in developing a nonflush toilet. It will have separate compartments for urine and feces, along with a third compartment for water that is used to keep the toilet clean. After filtering, this water can be reused in the cleaning process.

“No innovation in the past 200 years has done more to save lives and improve health than the sanitation revolution triggered by invention of the toilet,” says Sylvia Mathews Burwell from the foundation. “But it did not go far enough. It only reached one-third of the world. What we need are new approaches. New ideas. In short, we need to reinvent the toilet.”

Financing will be given to one or more of the winning prototypes to be tested and produced commercially.

Via New York Times.

Image by alvimann via morgueFile

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Janet Fang

About Janet Fang

Janet Fang is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Janet Fang

Janet Fang
Contributing Editor, Healthcare

Janet Fang has written for Nature, Discover and the Point Reyes Light. She is currently a lab technician at Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory. She holds degrees from the University of California, Berkeley and Columbia University. She is based in New York.

Follow her on Twitter.

Janet Fang

Janet Fang

Janet does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what she covers.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
9
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+4 Votes
+ -
I hope that the Humanure folks get in on this....
Joe Jenkins has done a great job of getting high quality information out about low tech, effective composting toilets through his book, "The Humanure Handbook." Check out his site:
http://humanurehandbook.com/index.html

Bottom line (no pun intended), it doesn't have to be high tech to be very effective. In fact, the simpler, the better, and Joe's done his homework to show what can be simply and hygienically done with a 5 gallon bucket if you combine the human element with with right mix of readily available carbon sources such as sawdust, cottonseed hulls, etc. His book is pretty funny, too, for all the reasons you'd expect.
Posted by klassman6
16th Aug
+1 Vote
+ -
Humanure Handbook
Funny, I've had their ebook ( The humanure handbook ) stored on my computer for the past couple of months; waiting to be read, and I started reading it this week.

I haven't gotten very far into the book yet, but I'd think shredded paper would also work as a carbon source to add into the.... mix.
Posted by bbrewster@...
19th Aug
0 Votes
+ -
It's already been done
It was called an outhouse!
Posted by WolverineMoto
16th Aug
+2 Votes
+ -
All human and animal waste should be composted to humas
An outhouse is not a good idea and impractical in cities and cold climates. The excrement need to be reused to grow plants, and an outhouse makes them unavailable and the pathogens stay active to be leached downward by rain into the water tables. I too, support the Humanure method. Simple and effective. Excrement should never be mixed with water (energy and expense to try to separate them), dried (the pathogens don't die) nor burned (we need the valuable nutrients in human to grow plants instead of artificial fertilizers). The downside of Joe Jenkins' Humanure is that you need a place to have your 3 bin composting pile and not everyone has access to that outdoor space. I'm for beginning the composting process in the toilet as a batch process and finishing it somewhere else by changing out the gathering chamber. Dense cities and apartment buildings could have collection services to finish the process. The final product of proper composting is very rich, pathogen free, smell free and farming valuable humus.
Posted by skipdykoski@...
16th Aug
-2 Votes
+ -
It was called a "Chamber Pot"
Back in the good old days when people died from tooth decay, chronic diarhea, stubbed toes, etc. people who were wealthy enough did their business in a ceramic bowl/pitcher called a Chamber Pot, which sat in a box in a chair where the person doing their business sat. They then left their humanure? to be disposed of by the "Chamber Maid". I've been around "waterless urinals", which stink.
I've used porta-johns, which are horrifying.
I'm moving out of the burbs, leaving my compost piles in the back yard and into an apartment building with flush toilets, may God spare my soul.
When Bill and Melinda gates start doing their business in a 5 gallon bucket and remember to add sawdust and cottonseed hulls, I might consider doing it (not).
Call it was it is. A toilet for poor people who can't even get clean water to drink let alone to flush. I'm all for it, really. I simply have no intention of adding poop aiming to my deminishing skills as I cross the 60 year line. I'd rather be toilet trained in zero-g and use whatever the astronauts use. I bet they aren't using sawdust and cottonseed hulls. They don't sell either at the Wal*Mart.
Posted by PSFTGURU@...
17th Aug
+2 Votes
+ -
No it isn't.
There's as much difference between a composting toilet and a chamber pot as there is between a chamber pot and a regular toilet. And the first difference (and an answer to the next post) is that a composting toilet doesn't smell. The second difference is that you have no greater (or lesser) problem with aim using a composting toilet than you do with a regular toilet. They both use the same top, so if you can't hit one, you won't hit the other either--sorry you can't use the toilet as an excuse!

Sawdust/cottonseed hulls and other alternatives are simply a carbon source to keep the aerobic biological breakdown processing going so that it is completely broken down into healthy, pathogen-free soil. I'm sure that you could gussy it up with all kinds of fancy packaging to preserve your sensitivities around your bodily functions. Frankly, whether you like to think about it or not, your current toilet sends your pee and poop into your or someone else's drinking water as it is, which I find to be if not more offensive, certainly unnecessary. That is the impetus for this grant, no doubt--there is clearly potentially a better mousetrap out there!
Posted by klassman6
19th Aug
+1 Vote
+ -
Bottom line
it must not smell.
Posted by TrueDinosaur
17th Aug
+1 Vote
+ -
Mulching Toilets
Mulching toilets have been around for many years. Look up the Clivus Multrum composting toilet. It's been around at least since the early 1970's. You can also look other mulching toilet designs. They use bacteria in an enclosed container to process the waste. A small fan keeps the scents away from the bathroom. It's not like this is new technology.

Why all this interest in developing something that you can run out and buy right now, or that your parents could have bought before you were born?
Posted by YetAnotherBob
17th Aug
+1 Vote
+ -
Technology already exsists in various forms
Can be done with solar (plain sunlight) and properly designed system using no electricity or photo-electric panels.

www.cl.freeiz.com
Posted by BMNZ
27th Aug
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!