Follow this blog:
RSS

First ever stem cells created by cloning human embryos

By | October 5, 2011, 8:15 PM PDT

To create human embryonic stem cells, researchers have taken human egg cells, cloned them – just as they did Dolly the sheep back in 1996 – and then reprogrammed them to become embryos.

And they work! These stem cells went on to form various tissues.

BUT, they’re a bit abnormal… they have 3 sets of chromosomes (pictured), which means they’ll never be used to grow perfectly matched tissue for transplants.

However, at least we know the answer to the question: is it possible to make a cloned human embryo? “The clear answer of our paper to this is yes,” says study leader Dieter Egli of the New York Stem Cell Foundation Laboratory.

This cloning technique is called somatic cell nuclear transfer. It usually involves swapping DNA, but in this case, it involves adding the genome of an adult cell to the DNA of an egg.

(Somatic cells are all the ‘adult’ cells in our body that aren’t sex cells, which go on to become eggs or sperm. Somatic cells, have 2 sets of chromosomes, 1 from each parent. Sex cells have 1 total.)

The team ran a series of experiments using 270 eggs from 16 donors (who were each paid $8,000 like in vitro fertilization donors).

  1. They injected both sets of chromosomes from adult skin cells into unfertilized eggs.
  2. Then they got the introduced DNA to drive the eggs towards embryonic development.
  3. Although the resulting embryos have an extra set of chromosomes, they still developed into blastocysts (the hollow ball of cells that forms around day 5 of our development).
  4. From the blastocysts, the team went on to derive stem cells.

After 63 tries, they got 13 blastocysts and 2 stem cell lines. One carries the genome of a male who has type 1 diabetes, and the other of a healthy male adult.

This is the first conclusive evidence that a somatic cell genome transferred to a human embryo can be reprogrammed to a pluripotent state – with the ability to develop into all sorts of other cells in our body.

Okay, they’re not ‘true’ clones. Since the stem cells have 3 sets of chromosomes instead of the usual 2, the DNA doesn’t match the patient’s. (And our bodies really wouldn’t know what to do with 23 extra chromosomes.) With conventional cloning, the single set of chromosomes in the egg is usually removed… but in humans, the resulting cells stop developing early on and die.

To make this clinically relevant, they’ll need to get stem cells that are genetically matched to the donor. Egli’s group is trying to remove the egg’s DNA and create a viable embryo.

“This could allow us to create cells that are useful for transplantation for a variety of diseases without the problem of immunological rejection,” says lead author Scott Noggle.

Just how big of a deal is this? According to Nature News, this feat had at times been thought impossible, then inevitable, then completed, then incomplete and unfeasible.

The work was published in Nature today. Via Nature News, ScienceNOW.

Images from Noggle et al.

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Janet Fang

About Janet Fang

Janet Fang is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Janet Fang

Janet Fang
Contributing Editor

Janet Fang has written for Nature, Discover and the Point Reyes Light. She is currently a lab technician at Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory. She holds degrees from the University of California, Berkeley and Columbia University. She is based in New York.

Follow her on Twitter.

Janet Fang

Janet Fang

Janet does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what she covers.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
5
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+2 Votes
+ -
Ethics be damned!
Some day soon, people will be cloned. This experiment is just a flirtation - that no doubt can be justified in hundreds of ways. The flirtations and justifications will continue until we have human clones.

Is shooting a clone murder?
It's a clone, so I guess having human clone hunts will soon be legal.

Is eating a clone cannibalism?
Nahhhh, tastes like pig.

Humanity is determined to test all boundaries. Ethics be damned!
Posted by steve.hammill@...
6th Oct 2011
+1 Vote
+ -
You would shoot twins?
Identical twins are clones of each other. They have the same DNA. So you would shoot one? How would you choose which one to shoot? Or would you just make it simple and shoot both of them?
Posted by zackers
Updated - 9th Oct 2011
+1 Vote
+ -
Cart before the Horse
Theoretically, stem cells can be used to treat many kinds of illnesses; but, this is still in the experimental stage to see how to coax stem cells out of some cells. This is putting the problem of getting stems cells before the other part of research to show if stem cell therapy works or what complications would happen from stem cell therapy. Further research on both producing stem cells and stem cell therapy still needs to be done.

We already have clones, they are called twins and triplets. These are natural clones and they are just as human as anyone else, they have the same rights as everyone. If we are able to artificially clone people, then they are still human and have same rights as any.

When Europeans started exploring the Americas, there was a discussion about the natives. The discussion was whether the natives had souls or if they were like apes and were just animals. The current belief is that we are all human.
Posted by sboverie
6th Oct 2011
+1 Vote
+ -
At some point we may need embryonic stem cells
You are right that we still need to figure out if human (embryonic or adult) stem cells will do all the miracles that people think they might.

BUT -- we think there may be some things that only embryonic stem cells can do that adult stem cells cannot. The whole point of stem cell therapy is to replace or grow organs that are genetically identical to the organs you have now and won't be rejected by your immune system. We can do some tests now with embryonic stem cells from random embryos, and we may eventually be able to develop organs and therapies from them. However, we can't put such derived products in random people because they will reject them as they're not derived from their own tissue.

Thus if we find that we can only do certain things with embryonic stem cells, the final test will be taking a person with a failed organ such as a kidney, creating embryonic stem cells for that person from his or her own tissue, growing the stem cells into a kidney, and then transplanting that kidney into the person.

We didn't know creating human embryonic stem cells from a random person was possible until now. We didn't know how long it would take (we still don't). Other research is going on concurrently to coax stem cells into growing whatever we need. At some point we will have to combine the results of both tracks.
Posted by zackers
Updated - 9th Oct 2011
+2 Votes
+ -
This is a good thing???
Hello "Brave New World." Maybe next you'll be telling us they're serving Soylent Green for dinner. Cloning and harvesting embryos for stem cells? I suppose that's something Dr. Mengele would have approved of...but for me...no thank you!
Posted by blutarsky
6th Oct 2011
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!