Follow this blog:
RSS

Confused by your prescription drug label? You may be on information overload

By | June 1, 2011, 8:06 PM PDT

Take a look at your prescription bottle. If you’ve noticed an increasing number of side effects on your prescription label, you aren’t alone.

According to a new study, researchers found that the average prescription drug label lists 70 potential side effects, reported WebMD. On the higher end, one medication in the study listed 525 potential side effects, reported WebMD.

“It’s out of control,” said Jon Duke, MD, an assistant professor of medicine at Indiana University School of Medicine, in a phone interview with SmartPlanet.

By looking at almost 5,600 drug labels, researchers were able to see which drugs had the highest list of side effects.

“The greatest number of side effects were found in antidepressants, antiviral medications, and some treatments for Restless Leg Syndrome,” said Duke.

Duke explained that the large number of side effects listed could put an extra burden on doctors, who are obligated to sort through the information in order to make informed decisions about medications on behalf of their patients.

“The current information overload is the rule rather than the exception,” said Duke.

Although Duke pointed out that in the 2006 revision of drug labeling guidelines, the FDA openly discouraged the inclusion of “exhaustive lists of every reported adverse event, no matter how infrequent or minor,” said Duke.

“With current technology, drug labels could be transformed from lengthy static documents to dynamic resources, capable of delivering personalized patient information. Such labels could take into account the individual patient’s medical conditions and highlight those side effects that could be especially dangerous,” reported MyHealthNewsDaily.

The study, which was published in the Archives of Internal Medicine, doesn’t explain how patients comprehend the information printed on prescription labels. However, in future research studies, Duke hopes to examine how doctors and patients read and process prescription labels.

Tell us: Do you read the back of your prescription bottle? Do you understand each side effect listed for your prescription?

Related links: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/12/01/health/webmd/main2222635.shtml

Image: Thirteen of Clubs/Flickr

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Stacy Lipson

About Stacy Lipson

Stacy Lipson was a contributing writer for SmartPlanet from 2011 to 2012.

Stacy Lipson

Stacy Lipson

Contributing Writer

Stacy Lipson has written for Natural Health, MSNBC's Body Odd, HealthDay.com, Sprig.com, BNET.com, MarieClaire.com, MyDaily.com and Lemondrop.com. He holds a degree from Temple University. She is based in New York.

Follow her on Twitter.

Stacy Lipson

Stacy Lipson

Stacy does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what she covers. She wrote for GE's Healthymagination blog from September 2010 to January 2011, but no longer does so.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
4
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+2 Votes
+ -
The wrong point
This article focuses on information overload as the problem. But isn't the real problem that people are taking pills with an average of 70 possible side effects? You can bet that you're going to experience at least some of them. And then you'll have to take other drugs to manage those side effects, which will expose you to other side efffects, and so on and so on. This is insanity! The cure is worse than the illness!
Posted by rmberkowitz
2nd Jun 2011
+2 Votes
+ -
wrong frame of reference
We naively assume that the Feds make these regulations and that the drug makers and pharmacists print this stuff in our best interest.

They do it to avoid litigation. It is not that any of this labeling actually reduces medication misuse, it just provides indemnification via the blanket of regulatory compliance.

Simple software could check all this and tailor custom warnings at multiple points in the prescription, fulfillment, purchase and consumption path. But thanks to our lobbyists , litigators and regulators, such software would only expose the businesses who write it and use it, to even more more lawsuits.
Posted by cd3rd
Updated - 2nd Jun 2011
+2 Votes
+ -
Side Effects
The pharmaceutical companies have made their own bed, now they have to sleep in it. When the FDA let them advertise in mainstream news media they also had to cover their arses so as to avoid "you didn't tell me" negligence lawsuits. Big pharma advertises, doctors hate it because they don't want their patients telling them what to prescribe...it's all so sordid.
Posted by dangnad
2nd Jun 2011
+1 Vote
+ -
Side effects
Have the Big Pharmas ever thought of producing and marketing safer drugs that do not have side effects? No! That's how they make their monies. Use of one lead to the use of the next because one needs to overcome the side effects of the earlier drug and this cycle goes on and on. And guess, who gains from all these - The Big Pharmas. They want you to become their permanent clients. The end result - The Pharmas profit by making you perpetually sick and tie you to their prescription in different forms. The loser? The user itself. The Big Pharmas are the modern day leeches who are hell bent upon making monies at cost of the users.
Posted by pk.pal
3rd Jun 2011
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!