Follow this blog:
RSS

Biopixels: neon displays of glowing bacteria to detect toxins

By | January 4, 2012, 5:10 PM PST

Rather than blinking light bulbs, these flashing neon signs have millions of bacteria that will periodically fluoresce in unison.

Cool looking, yes. But since bacteria are sensitive to many kinds of environmental contaminants and organisms, this could also be used to design low cost bacterial biosensors capable of detecting an array of heavy metal pollutants and disease-causing organisms.

And because the senor is composed of living organisms, it can respond to changes in the presence or amount of toxins over time – unlike many chemical sensors.

The researchers describe it as “a liquid crystal display (LCD)-like macroscopic clock.”

The University of California, San Diego team led by Jeff Hasty attached a fluorescent protein to the biological clocks of the bacteria. “Many bacteria species are known to communicate by a mechanism known as quorum sensing,” Hasty says, “that is, relaying between them small molecules to trigger and coordinate various behaviors.”

This synchronizes the clocks of thousands of bacteria within a colony, then synchronizes thousands of blinking bacterial colonies to glow on and off in unison. Watch a cool video here.

It’s done using tiny microfluidic chips, and each blinking E. coli colony makes up a biopixel (pictured right) – like the individual points of light on TVs.

Smaller chips (pictured above) contain about 2.5 million cells and 500 biopixels. Larger chips (pictured below) contain up to 60 million bacteria and about 13,000 biopixels, and these’re about the size of a paper clip.

Using the same method to create signs, the researchers engineered a simple bacterial sensor capable of detecting low levels of arsenic. Decreases in the frequency of the oscillations of the cells’ blinking pattern indicate the presence and amount of the arsenic poison.

“Because the bacteria respond in different ways to different concentrations by varying the frequency of their blinking pattern, they can provide a continual update on how dangerous a toxin or pathogen is at any one time,” Hasty explains.

He believes that within 5 years, a small hand-held sensor could be developed to take readings of the bacteria on disposable microfluidic chips to determine the presence and concentrations of various toxic substances and pathogens in the field.

The work was published in Nature last month.

Via UCSD News.

Images: UCSD

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Janet Fang

About Janet Fang

Janet Fang is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Janet Fang

Janet Fang
Contributing Editor

Janet Fang has written for Nature, Discover and the Point Reyes Light. She is currently a lab technician at Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory. She holds degrees from the University of California, Berkeley and Columbia University. She is based in New York.

Follow her on Twitter.

Janet Fang

Janet Fang

Janet does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what she covers.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
The discussion hasn’t started yet. Why don’t you begin it?
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!