Follow this blog:
RSS

63 years of radiation insights from Hiroshima and Nagasaki

By | March 31, 2011, 8:57 AM PDT

The atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 exposed hundreds of thousands to intense heat and ionizing radiations. Long-term health studies of the survivors may provide insight into the radiation-related effects occurring in Japan now.

The latest issue of Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, published by the American Medical Association, shares lessons learned from following the survivors for 63 years.

A quick timeline:

  • President Harry Truman approved the original directive to study the biological and medical effects of the atomic bomb on humans.
  • In 1947, the Atomic Bomb Casualty Commission (ABCC) was created.
  • The Life Span Study was instituted in 1955 to follow-up on mortality and cancer incidence of a sample of about 120,000 atomic bomb survivors and control subjects.
  • The ABCC was restructured in 1975 to become the Radiation Effects Research Foundation (RERF) to continue research on the health the atomic bomb survivors and their children, with financial and scientific support from the Japanese and US governments.

According to the review article, approximately 40% of the atomic bomb survivors are alive today. This includes about 80% of those who were exposed before they were 20 years old – which carries a higher risk.

Among the atomic bomb survivors, researchers have found:

  • Increased risk of leukemia.
  • Gradual increase in solid cancers starting several years after bombings. Survivors received whole-body exposures from the penetrating radiation, leading to significant cancer risks in the oral cavity, esophagus, stomach, colon, liver, lung, skin, breast, ovary, urinary bladder, brain/central nervous system, and thyroid.
  • Reduction in life span – due to solid cancer, leukemia, and noncancer diseases such as chronic hepatitis – anywhere from 2 months to 2.6 years depending on the radiation dose.

With respect to the search for radiation-induced mutations and risk to succeeding generations, the authors write, the goal is that future studies using newer DNA analyses will be able to detect an elevated mutation rate (if one exists) or confirm the low mutation rate they observed in the second generation.

These atomic lessons, they hope, can serve future generations who experience occupational, medical, or environmental radiation exposures.

The review appeared in the Nuclear Preparedness special issue.

Image: Hiroshima and Nagasaki after the bombings / E.B. Douple et al.

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Janet Fang

About Janet Fang

Janet Fang is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Janet Fang

Janet Fang
Contributing Editor, Healthcare

Janet Fang has written for Nature, Discover and the Point Reyes Light. She is currently a lab technician at Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory. She holds degrees from the University of California, Berkeley and Columbia University. She is based in New York.

Follow her on Twitter.

Janet Fang

Janet Fang

Janet does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what she covers.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
3
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: 63 years of radiation insights from Hiroshima and Nagasaki
What will be very significant to ascertain is the comparison with doses today and the dose of the bombs. Everyone knows that high doses are dangerous and carry much higher probabilities of developing cancer. I am tired of seeing people trying to use the low levels of radiation that has escaped so far from Fukushima being made into a prediction that is actually based on high dose bomb exposures. I note with much interest that 80% of the youngsters that had a very high exposure dose are still alive today. That is very encouraging.
Posted by Caroline Webb
31st Mar 2011
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: 63 years of radiation insights from Hiroshima and Nagasaki
It is very encouraging. So is the fact that the reduction in life span is only 2 months to 2.6 years. I'm not saying it's ok that their lives were shortened, but that it's wonderful, and rather amazing, that it's not been much worse.
And you're right, the levels of radiation from the reactors is miniscule compared to the levels so many were exposed to in an instant from the bombings.
Posted by John T. Hill III
2nd Apr 2011
0 Votes
+ -
Hiroshima and Nagasaki
What does Hiroshima and Nagasaki look like today 66 years on?
Posted by Shinagirl
7th May
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!