Follow this blog:
RSS

Tesla’s sales model? It’s simple: don’t sell cars

By | December 20, 2012, 5:23 AM PST

If you are waiting with bated breath for electric vehicles to revolutionize the transportation sector, you are likely to pass out. If it happens, it will not be an overnight process. That said, there is significant momentum behind the nascent industry. While sales of purely electric vehicles (EVs) and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) are still minuscule compared to those with internal combustion engines, the 16 EV models on the market today will grow to 40 over the next two years and the 42 PHEVs models will grow to 73 by 2014.

Every major carmaker is putting considerable resources into electrification, but one of a few purely EV startups — Tesla Motors — is shaking up more than just the drivetrain.

Tesla began opening its retail stores and smaller format “galleries” in 2008. There are currently around 25 of them in North America. Visitors (both perspective owners and curious browsers) can learn about the cars, sit inside one and in some cases take test drives and place a reservation for their very own. Not unlike Apple stores, these spaces are high-touch and modern. But they’re also rattling the foundation of how cars have traditionally been sold, and as a result, Tesla is being sued by the dealership franchise organizations in Massachusetts and New York and is under the threat of lawsuit in at least two others.

Stepping on Dealer’s Toes
At issue is the fact that Tesla sells its cars direct to consumers. This might not sound so revolutionary, but in the world of auto sales, it sure is. In 48 states, dealership franchise laws prohibit manufacturers from also selling the cars they make, rather than selling through third party dealers. These rules are designed to ensure that manufacturers can’t undercut dealers on price. In exchange, carmakers have rules and standards that dealerships must follow in order to be able to sell the cars, repair them and represent the various brands.

While it does not plan on suing Tesla, the National Automobile Dealers Association says it supports the state boards that are pursuing legal action and that the dealership model offers consumers “a reliable network for sales and service, which is strictly regulated to ensure the vehicle transportation needs of car buyers are met.” NADA’s chairman Bill Underriner adds that its dealers have fought this battle before — and won.

“Over the years, other manufacturers have tried operating their own retail networks, but have concluded that the franchised new-car dealer system is the best method of serving the public for its vehicle transportation needs,” he says.

George Blankenship

Who, Us?
For its part, Tesla says it takes pains to ensure it is operating within the laws of each state. Sometimes that means it can’t operate on certain days, or provide test drives, or take orders onsite. (Tesla actually sells its cars online, so the location is moot in that respect.) But Tesla’s vice president of sales and ownership experience George Blankenship says that’s fine. Our goal is for “everyone to leave our stores with a smile on their faces,” he says. If the company can make consumers stoked on EVs and especially on Teslas, that’s the first step. “I want people to want the car, I don’t want to sell them the car,” he says.

That might sound Pollyannaish, but on the other hand, Tesla can’t sell cars the way other automakers do, anyway. Each car is bespoke, and reservations are often placed many months prior to delivery. The stores and galleries exist, therefore, to introduce Tesla to a wider audience.

“It’s fair to say that Tesla is facing a potentially challenging situation because I believe that conventional franchise auto dealers feel threatened by the Tesla model. They understand that consumers find it bizarre that they can’t order a car [aside from Tesla] the way they order an iPhone. And because Blankenship is from Apple, the parallels [between Apple and Tesla stores] could not be clearer,” says John Voelcker, EV expert and writer for Just-Auto.com, High Gear Media, and other outlets.

In 2010, Tesla recruited Blankenship, a retail veteran who served as vice president of real estate for Apple Computer, from 2000 to 2006 (and before that led retail strategy at The Gap) to direct Tesla’s retail experiment. “In shopping malls, people who walk into our stores, they don’t even know who we are. People will be walking down the mall and they’ll see a car and they’re drawn in by that” and often they don’t know at first the car is electric. “We’re educating, not selling. It’s two different things. We’re not just telling people why an EV is a good car but why it might be better than what they’re driving today — not just because it’s good for the environment” but also for its storage capacity, or low maintenance or because instant torque provides a completely different driving dynamic, he says.

Holding a Charge
Last month, a Massachusetts judge refused to grant car dealers an injunction that would have forced Tesla to stop its operations there. Still, the legal battles might be long and protracted, and there are more than 45 other state franchise boards that could decide to sue Tesla, as well. Car dealer groups are digging their heels in. NADA’s Underriner told Automotive News: “We’ve got a whole mess of lawyers in Washington who work on state franchise law.” Yikes.

Underriner and Tesla CEO Elon Musk did have an hour-plus meeting at Tesla’s California headquarters late in November, according to a report, but neither has divulged the specifics.

Meanwhile, Tesla continues to establish more retail outposts and is launching more production and distribution in Europe. Its Model S is Motor Trend’s Car of the Year for 2013. Plus, Tesla has reached some milestones that naysayers loudly doubted, such as hitting its summer 2012 deadline for the Model S (which starts at $50,000). Confidence defines Tesla’s corporate culture.

Blankenship has no shortage of confidence, either. What Tesla has accomplished thus far — producing the Roadster, with its incredible speed and long range, followed by the Model S, with even more range — wasn’t just difficult, “it was impossible,” Blankenship boasts. Given all that, what’s a couple lawsuits (so far) threatening to shut down Tesla’s factory stores? Time will tell.

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Mary Catherine O'Connor

About Mary Catherine O'Connor

Mary Catherine O'Connor is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Mary Catherine O'Connor

Mary Catherine O'Connor

Contributing Editor

Mary Catherine O'Connor has written for Fast Company, Wired, Outside, Entrepreneur, Earth2Tech, Earth Island Journal and The Bold Italic. She is based in San Francisco.

Follow her on Twitter.

Mary Catherine O'Connor

Mary Catherine O'Connor

Mary Catherine has written white papers and marketing material for technology companies and will not write about companies with which is actively engaged. She will disclose any instances in which her work mentions companies for which she has worked. Mary Catherine does not hold any investments in the companies that she covers.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
79
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+11 Votes
+ -
NADA Dealerships the same?
It is interesting that when we go into a car dealership and they pull out the old NADA book that is touted as being impartial may in fact be from this dealership alliance! Interesting I didn't know this but now that I do I will no longer be taken by it! Just one more corrupt industry entity in the good old USA. I think Tesla should be allowed to sell their products any way they choose. Wouldn't it be nice to finally see real free market. Go Tesla hold your ground and don't give up or give in.
Posted by michael@...
20th Dec
+11 Votes
+ -
A great example of how government regulation is used...
...by established players to thwart competition. Our economy is rife with this.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
20th Dec
+4 Votes
+ -
Amen
Big government regulation isn't always there to help the little guy.
Posted by frylock
20th Dec
+3 Votes
+ -
Big Government is a bogeyman phrase
Big Government is a bogeyman phrase fueled by the giant corporations and banks to bypass and eliminate regulation we need to protect us from their abuses. But the government is what we make it and again mega-corporations and banks manipulate government and politicians with unlimited campaign funds and severe ubiquitous lobbying that we little guys can't do. We have to battle like mad to limit money's influence in the government and legislative process. And we need to join real citizen based organizations where we have more clout in numbers so we can get the government (what ever it's size) to do what we want it to do and not a shill for the mega-corporation and banks.
Posted by skipdykoski@...
21st Dec
-2 Votes
+ -
Unfortunately, the bigger and more empowered that government gets...
...the more it will draw money. Business and other interests will pour money into the process for both advantage and survival.

Most of the solutions that people propose only seek to make the government bigger and more powerful, which is the problem in the first place.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
23rd Dec
0 Votes
+ -
Govt vs private sector
It is perfectly true that the government frequently acts like the captive of the big global corporations. But if we could get them to actually replace the private sector in actual production, say of pharmaceuticals, or even energy, instead of relying upon subsidies, tax breaks, and underfunded regulatory agencies whose commissioners are terrified of Tea Party type Congress people, we might even come up with some things as good as the BBC, or our own Centers for Disease Control.
It should be clear by now that the laisser faire economists are responsible for the mess that Obama took over, and that the private sector is not all it's cracked up to be.
Posted by SmartAlbert
Updated - 24th Dec
+1 Vote
+ -
Seriously?
Can you name anything the government does efficiently or even competently? Anything at all? They lose money selling sex and alcohol!

As for the BBC, have you not been paying attention to what they've been going through lately?

https://www.google.com/search?q=bbc+scandal&aq=0&oq=bbc+scand&aqs=chrome.0.0j57j0l2j62l2.2140&sugexp=chrome,mod=8&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

A pretty bad example to select on an argument for government competence and expantion.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
Updated - 24th Dec
-1 Votes
+ -
something the government does efficiently
How about health insurance? Their administrative costs are far lower than private health insurance. Administrative costs in Medicare are only about 2 percent of operating expenditures. Defenders of the insurance industry estimate administrative costs as 17 percent of revenue.
Insurance industry-funded studies exclude private plans marketing costs and profits from their calculation of administrative costs. Even so, Medicares overhead is dramatically lower.
Medicare administrative cost figures include the collection of Medicare taxes, fraud and abuse controls, and building costs.
http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2011/09/20/medicare-is-more-efficient-than-private-insurance/
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/08/15/us-column-miller-medicare-idUSBRE87E15N20120815
Posted by darudmon@...
31st Dec
0 Votes
+ -
The government definitely does not do health insurance efficiently.
If that was true, then why is ObamaCare obsessed with cost control while at the same time loaded with bureaucratic overhead?

(Actually, that's a trick question. ObamaCare is specifically designed to break the insurance industry and ultimately fail)

Their administrative costs are low because they just pay claims as they are presented without question. So the system is rife with fraud. Since private companies are unable to print money like the Federal government does, they cannot afford to tolerate such levels of fraud and have a much more complex administrative function.

But don't worry. Soon the federally overseen system will be at least as complex.

Medicare is fundamentally bankrupt, btw. Hardly a model to emulate.

But you unwittingly do bring up the one thing that government does do relatively efficiently: Mindlessly spew out other people's money.

Try again.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
Updated - 3rd Jan
-3 Votes
+ -
The situation is ticklish.
Dealers make their money through a healthy mark-up on cars, which is protected by these anticompetitive laws. But if we were free to bypass the dealer and save the money, they'd have no income and dealers would cease to exist. Then, the next time you wanted to buy a new car, who'd be giving you a test drive?
Posted by steve_jonesuk@...
20th Dec
+8 Votes
+ -
The car maker themselves
Most people will not buy a car that they have not test driven.
So, you end up with the display stores as described in the article.
Posted by richard233
20th Dec
+4 Votes
+ -
The World is Changing
Remember when the only telephone you could obtain was made, rented and installed by the phone company. Sometimes I wonder how we actually got to the moon. Did we?
Posted by CLK3RD
20th Dec
+3 Votes
+ -
Bad example
That was also the company that developed the transistor, without which we would not have made it to the moon. That's not to say I disagree with you in general, just that you should look for a better example.
Posted by ijrosenberg@...
20th Dec
0 Votes
+ -
The moon
I wish people would not write and speak about getting to the moon as anything but a propaganda stunt. For actually impressive science, we have the Hubble telescope, and better yet, the Chandra X-ray one. The most impressive solar system voyages were made by the Voyagers, I and II, which got to the outer planets although the energy content of their fuel tanks was insufficient to take them there.
They stole a boost from the planets Jupiter and Neptune, slowing each of them down by an infinitesimal amount, but just enough to fling themselves out farther.
Posted by SmartAlbert
24th Dec
+8 Votes
+ -
Tesla Can Easily Work Around This
Form a new company. Call it Tesla Sales. Tesla Motors sells 100% of their cars to Tesla Sales (the third party) Tesla Sales then sells to consumers.
Posted by bb_apptix
20th Dec
0 Votes
+ -
Third Party
Problem is this wouldn't be a "third party" if Tesla ownes or controls it...
Posted by z2217
20th Dec
-3 Votes
+ -
Reality is that, car dealers are controlled by the auto manufacturers,
and the manufacturers either grant a license to a dealer, or not. The dealer has to work under the rules of the care maker, which thereby, makes the dealers not really independent.

Furthermore, working under the auspices and general rules of NADA, also makes the dealers, not that independent.

NADA is in it to make money, and so are the dealers, and so are the car makers. They all make the car a bit more expensive.

However, I'm not in favor of what Tesla does either.
Posted by adornoe
20th Dec
-3 Votes
+ -
This is an old idea
I bought a Lexus in 1999 on the Internet, and it was delivered to the office. This is simply a decrease in service to the customer, and it creates an increased lack of clarity as to what happens to these cars if this company fails. There still needs to be a local site to provide service and if it is the company that fails???. This is form over substance, and lowers the bar for what is supposed to be a high end car.
Posted by JKEc
20th Dec
+1 Vote
+ -
you still bought from a dealer
the lack of service was from the dealer, not Lexus
Who really likes goign to a dealer anyway, it is just the only option.
As someone else pointed out Bell said the same thing about their phones.
How could you feel safe and secure with a phone bought from Target rather than and expesive rental from Ma Bell.
Posted by CharlesG1970
20th Dec
+1 Vote
+ -
Lack of Service?
Charles, I just bought another car off the Internet using the USAA buying service. I get the best available price that is out there, and I pick the car up or have it delivered. What is this "less service", since that is the way that I buy? Service is loaners and repairs, along with things like picking me up and taking me back to pick up my car.
Posted by JKEc
21st Dec
0 Votes
+ -
Who will serve the Tesla
Who will serve the Tesla? Does Tesla have a nationwide system of service stations? What if I get in an accident? the batteries fail? the doors won't unlock? etc.? Where do I take it in or have it serviced?
Posted by oldercli
20th Dec
+1 Vote
+ -
Service? How is it handled right now? It shouldn't be dramatically
different.

When you take a car to the dealer for service, chances are that, if the car needs to remain in the shop for more than a day, that you can get a rental car that is covered by the original service agreement, if the car is still under warranty.

If you take a Tesla in for service, chances are that, they'll also have a service agreement that is part of the warranty, which should include a rental car that is available for the time that the car is in service.

The only problem might be that, not all local shops will be equipped to handle Tesla's technology or drive train or other equipment, which would mean that the car would need to be transported to a Tesla authorized service dealer.

But, most people should understand what they're getting before they buy it. A Tesla won't be as common as other "regular" cars, and there won't be dealers in every town or city, and there won't be as many service shops capable of dealing with the rare cars. So, getting stuck and paying higher prices and suffering through longer waiting periods for service, is something that consumers would hopefully understand before paying such a hefty price.
Posted by adornoe
20th Dec
+1 Vote
+ -
Not just Tesla, Audi too
Try getting a new Audi with aluminum body panels repaired. Even most dealers are not equipped to handle this type of repair and it often takes a week or more for what should be a one or two day deal. My point is not to complain about Audi, but that just having dealers doesn't guarantee service.
Posted by Day Dreamer
21st Dec
+1 Vote
+ -
Servicing your Tesla
You raise important issues. Were I interested in a Tesla, I'd make a list of questions to be raised with a Tesla represented as well as researched on the Internet. If I could find a Tesla owner willing to about the car, I'd ask her/him before and visiting the Tesla showroom.

I drive a VW in a community where there is no dealer. Typically I drive 30 minutes to a community where there is one, but I've also found garages closer where the mechanics have the necessary training and are familiar with VWs.
Posted by Vazir Mukhtar
21st Dec
0 Votes
+ -
Older, Excellent point
You have moved the connection between the local customer, and the local dealer, to an "800 number" where someone 1000 miles away decides what you deserve if this company even makes it, which is doubtful. I don't think the company has made a dime, and they have been around for a long time.
Posted by JKEc
21st Dec
0 Votes
+ -
According to Tesla's website,
there are 14 Service Centers across North America with 15 more coming soon. Europe has 7 and Asia has 2.
http://www.teslamotors.com/findus/service

The Model S service interval is 12.5k miles or 12mos.
Service Center locations are chosen so that 9 out of 10 Model S reservation holders will be within 100miles of one.
If you can't bring the car to them, for an extra $100 Tesla can send a Tesla Ranger (technician) to you.
http://www.teslamotors.com/service
Posted by RussellL
Updated - 23rd Dec
+4 Votes
+ -
NADA is just afraid . . .
That Tesla will start a trend. If Tesla were allowed to cut out the middle men like they are doing, auto companies would soon follow suit.
Posted by Gerald Shields
20th Dec
+7 Votes
+ -
The problem with the law.
It makes perfect sense to not allow a car maker to undercut its own dealer network who paid for a franchise, etc. However, if there is no such network to be harmed then the law does not hold water.
Posted by richard233
20th Dec
+4 Votes
+ -
Value for the customer?
I'm not in the biz, but I think most dealerships make the bulk of their money on the financing, service and parts that customers buy. That's how these huge dealerships can have hundreds of cars that just sit on the lot. otherwise they'd have to sell scores of these things every day to stay afloat.

I'd argue that the Tesla model (if successful) cud benefit the customer. You could order the car exactly as you want it, b/c you're not buying from the cookie cutter volume that a manufacturer produces and that a dealership buys ("We got that one, but only in red."). The service could be better as well, b/c the technicians would work directly for the company that makes the cars, and unlike auto techs at dealerships, would only be working on a handful of models as opposed to multiple makes with multiple models.

But this may be the model that is needed to get EV cars mainstream and in a position to seriously compete with combustion--manufacturers and dealer sell what they have the most of: outdated and inefficient combustion-engine powered cars. Karl Benz invented his version of the automobile in 1885--and it's just now that cars are getting 40-50 mpg ?? If computers had evolved on that timeline, we'd just now have a personal computer small enough to fit in a closet. And actually, it's the evolution of the computer that actually allows most of those inefficient vehicles to achieve that mileage.

I think the auto industry is long overdue for an evolution.
Posted by BobaFettismyuncle
20th Dec
0 Votes
+ -
Great comment.
It is amazing how long it takes to see improvements in gas milage and other features.
Posted by dennyinusa
20th Dec
0 Votes
+ -
In the 60's, in Britain, I got 40 mpg.
or more, with a three wheel car that nevertheless sufficed in a carpool of four of us. It wouldn't go faster than about 50 mph, but on County Down's winding roads that is fast enough.
Posted by SmartAlbert
24th Dec
0 Votes
+ -
MPG vs. Horsepower
My theory on why cars have been so slow to improve MPG is because the car makers put (or had until recently) all of their emphasis on improving horsepower primarily (and other things to a lesser extent). They have not really cared about improving gas mileage because, at least in the US, that is not what customers have demanded. So, instead of 80 MPG or better cars, we get 350 to 500 or 600 horsepower beasts which cannot legally use even a fraction of their capabilities on our streets. Like many others, I enjoy the idea of high-performance cars, but upon further thought have decided it is simply stupid as an individual to have a car (and stupid as a society to allow for cars) that will go that fast (some approaching 200 mph, as fast as some race cars).
Posted by Bob C User
4th Jan
0 Votes
+ -
Compare prices and wake up
How much does a car cost when bought from an individual, compared to that same car from a used car dealer? And don't tell me about the "guarantee" you get from the dealer. Hah! Just try to get them to honor it. In the end, you have to sue if they've cheated you, which is what you would have done with an individual anyway.
Posted by dmm99
20th Dec
+3 Votes
+ -
This is not really the dealers but the Big 3 auto
The Big 3 are happy with the way things are and are going to use every tool they have to keep upstarts (like TESLA) down, including this.

Look at what you get for 50k with a Tesla, now look at the cost of a Volt. Holly cow with multiple fees, financign etc the crapy volt cost more...

Becasue you have to pay for the big 3 auto's big 3 expenses.
Posted by CharlesG1970
20th Dec
-1 Votes
+ -
I've seen Volts advertised at $23,000 & $24,000, after
trade in, and manufacturer incentives, and dealer incentives, and the $7500 government "green car" incentive.

That still won't get me to purchase the Volt when I can get a combustion engine car that can take me 500 miles on a tank of gas, and which I could "reload/refuel" in about 5 minutes time. Plus, a combustion engine and transmission and other moving parts, can be serviced by most repair shops that probably number into the hundreds of thousands in the U.S. alone.
Posted by adornoe
20th Dec
+1 Vote
+ -
Electric motors seldom or never need service.
The electric motor in a Tesla will probably never require service. The batteries only need to be replaced every 5 or 10 years.

With a full tank of gas and a fully charged battery a Volt will go about 380 miles. That's far enough for most people.
Posted by riverat1
20th Dec
+1 Vote
+ -
THAT'S reassuring!
The battery replacement cost is currently $30k, or customers can buy a pre-paid replacement option for $12,000 at the time of purchase. And you say I get to do this every five to ten years?

Wow- where do I sign up?
Posted by ddferrari
Updated - 21st Dec
0 Votes
+ -
riverati
What about the air conditioning, the power windows, the brakes, and 100's other items. The batteries are the equivilent of gasoline and probably cost more than gasoline. Repairs are seldom on most car engines today, they are on the electronics and all of the other parts of the car.
Posted by JKEc
21st Dec
+3 Votes
+ -
Standard equipment
All of those other things you mention are pretty standard equipment that just about any competent repair facility can fix.

I don't know that batteries cost more than gasoline. Certainly the electricity you buy to charge the batteries is far cheaper than gas. There's a lot of research going on in battery technology and it will be interesting to see what develops over the next decade.
Posted by riverat1
21st Dec
-1 Votes
+ -
Service on Tesla's
Rivera, I don't think so. Where would they get the parts? Who would train them? Try taking a Prius into a local repair shop and asking them to fix one. Do you believe the air conditioner on a Tesla works the same way as any other car? Do you think you can take a Tesla anywhere for service and not void the warranty?
Posted by JKEc
21st Dec
+1 Vote
+ -
Service on Teslas are no different than any other premium car
If you owned a Porsche, Mercedes or BMW, would you take it to just any repair shop?

Tesla's Service Center locations are chosen so that 9 out of 10 Model S reservation holders will be within 100miles of one.

Plus, if you're worried about who's going to repair your power windows or air conditioning then stick to a Ford, GM, Honda or Toyota.
Posted by RussellL
Updated - 23rd Dec
0 Votes
+ -
I take my Prius to the closest local repair shop.
I've never had any local repair shop refuse to service our family's 2009 Toyota Prius. If anything the mechanics seem disappointed when most of the parts are no different than any other modern automobile!

Tesla has smart enough designers on staff to know that trying to re-design every component down to the car air conditioner is a recipe for cost over-runs, and customer backlash when it comes time to make basic repairs. The beauty of an electric engine is having hundreds fewer parts than an internal combustion engine with their exhaust, ignition, cooling, and lubricating systems.
Posted by Economist Cory
26th Dec
-2 Votes
+ -
380 miles, and then what? Wait a day for a re-charge?
That will never make the Tesla a practical car to own, and it's a lot less practical when one has to pay $100,000 or more for one of them to begin with.

The Tesla has the "coolness" factor going for it, but not much else.
Posted by adornoe
22nd Dec
+1 Vote
+ -
Model S was not designed for everybody.
Driving a hybrid or a pure electric vehicle requires more planning than a regular car. More and more people are doing it everyday.

The base price of the Model S is $57,400 which makes it priced toward buyers of the BMW 5 Series and Mercedes E Class.

If those are not your type of cars, then neither is the Model S.
Posted by RussellL
23rd Dec
-1 Votes
+ -
Drive it certain places
If yoi want a car that you can only drive to certain places, and have limited opportunities to have repaired near you, this is the car for you. I will not become mainstream. The problem that Tesla has is that it could never set up a nationwide network of dealers with its tiny volume. They have no choice. Who would invest in a service network (as a dealer) when there were 5 cars in your area?
Posted by JKEc
21st Dec
0 Votes
+ -
No, drive it everywhere.
Service Center locations are chosen so that 9 out of 10 Model S reservation holders will be within 100miles of one.

If you can't bring the car to them, for an extra $100 Tesla can send a Tesla Ranger (technician) to you.
http://www.teslamotors.com/service
Posted by RussellL
23rd Dec
0 Votes
+ -
But eventually,
Gasoline is going to cost more and more. Already, there's a huge cost being imposed upon other people, in terms of the pollution of the atmosphere. I don't know how soon I'll buy an electric car, probably never, 'cause I'm old. But if ever the country gets sense enough to put coal, petroleum, and gaseous hydrocarbons out of business, the basic energy currency will be electricity.
Posted by SmartAlbert
24th Dec
0 Votes
+ -
The Big 3 have been trying to close dealerships
Charles, you need to go back to 2008 and see how many dealers the Big 3 shut down, took over, or tried to shut down.
Posted by JKEc
21st Dec
-1 Votes
+ -
Actually, GM and Chrysler dealerships were closed by the federal government
when they essentially took "ownership" of the car companies. Most, or all, of those dealerships would have stayed open if the government hadn't dictated terms to the car manufacturers. To boot, the dealerships that were closed, were those that were least "friendly" towards Obama and democrats. Many thousands of people were laid off, mostly for political reasons.
Posted by adornoe
22nd Dec
+1 Vote
+ -
Tesla edge is more than just marketing
There is more than one storyline here for NADA not wanting Tesla changing things up. They want to change over to EV from combustion engines on their (car makers) own terms in their own time line. To change the way they produce cars means that they have to spend money to make new production lines in their factories or new factories all together and then train workers to work on the lines and that all costs big bucks.

On a side note - one reason it has taken so long for industry to get the higher MPG cars is the consumer. All the gadgets and gizmo's consumers expect and demand in their cars takes power from the engine and therefore causes lower gas mileage --- SIrrius radio and internal GPS and heated seats and all the other niceties that people expect but are not really needed to have the car move down the road. If consumers didn't demand all the extra's - we would have reached higher mileage cars a long time ago.
Posted by llandau@...
20th Dec
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!