Follow this blog:
RSS

Withdrawal is cruel, whether it’s from coke or cookies

By | November 11, 2009, 3:50 AM PST

My friend Dave and I walk our dogs together nearly every afternoon. When I’m in a bad mood, he brings me cookies. When he’s between diets, I bring him baked goods from my oven. We’re dependable enablers. And every few weeks, without fail, he’ll say, “I’m trying this new thing.” Sometimes it’s eating an early, healthy dinner, followed by a cookie reward. Sometimes it’s a different breakfast or zero caffeine or a new workout. This week, he’s cutting out all refined sugar.

I tried to cut out sugar for two weeks last year after an NFL player told me he’d done so during the off-season and felt like a million bucks. He warned me that the withdrawal process would cause headaches at first, but soon, I’d feel infinitely better. Likewise, Dave told me yesterday, he’d had some headaches since he began this diet. I commiserated, and then asked him how long he’d stick with it.

“You tell me,” he laughed, reminding me that he’s been yo-yo dieting since high school. Indeed, I’ve seen Dave diet for a few weeks, only to succumb to his wife’s amazing cupcakes (guilty here, too). Or test out a program that counts calories, only to become so frustrated that he would later double his cookie intake. But through all these cycles, or perhaps because of them, he is more aware than most people of how foods affect him.

So neither of us were surprised to learn about the recent study out of Boston University’s Laboratory of Addictive Disorders, appearing in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, that shows depriving oneself of yummy foods (read: sugar, fat, carbs) can cause compulsive eating, similar to the chemical reaction of a drug addiction. The study showed that after rats were deprived of “palatable food” (in this case, sugary, chocolate-flavored rat chow—yum), they would exhibit overeating of this tasty food once they had access again. In fact, they proceeded to binge on it.

As the study progressed over seven weeks, the effect became more pronounced, and the binging rats were eating roughly 20 percent more food when they had access to chocolate chow than rats in the control group (who only had regular rat chow). According to ScienceNOW, the rats going through chocolate chow withdrawal also spent less time in the exposed parts of a specially designed maze, a measure of increased anxiety. When the chocolate chow was returned, the anxiety disappeared.

So not only were they pigging out on chocolate and avoiding the healthier food option, but the rats’ emotional states were affected. This shows the root of the vicious cycle with which yo-yo dieters and drug abusers are all too familiar: cut out pleasurable substance; ache for pleasurable substance; feel awful (physically and mentally) while enduring absence of pleasurable substance; finally give in to pleasurable substance, consuming even more of it than before, to make up for lost time.

So what is a sugar addict to do? Do not run for the cookie jar. Or the chocolate chow bin. Check back tomorrow when I discuss sugar addiction and withdrawal with Greg Lewis, co-author of the new book End Your Addiction Now: A Proven Nutritional Supplement Program That Can Set You Free.

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Melanie D.G. Kaplan

About Melanie D.G. Kaplan

Melanie D.G. Kaplan is a contributing writer for SmartPlanet.

Melanie D.G. Kaplan

Melanie D.G. Kaplan

Contributing Writer

Melanie D.G. Kaplan is a regular contributor to The Washington Post and WebMD and has written for The New York Times, National Geographic Traveler and People. She holds degrees from Syracuse University and Columbia University's Graduate School of Journalism. She is based in Washington, D.C.

Follow her on Twitter.

Melanie D.G. Kaplan

Melanie D.G. Kaplan

In addition to working as a journalist, Melanie keeps the dog food fund flush with occasional consulting jobs. In the unusual event that her writing mentions a company or organization for which she has provided editorial services, she will disclose that fact. She will do the same should she cover any companies in which she holds investments.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
2
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Withdrawal is cruel, whether it's from coke or cookies
Another great post. I am anxiously awaiting tomorrow's topic , since it may hold the key to ending my own sugar addiction. I wonder how many cookies I can eat between now and then ?
Posted by sashavinny
11th Nov 2009
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Withdrawal is cruel, whether it's from coke or cookies
Anyone else find it ironic that a piece so sympathetic about denial
ends on a cliffhanger? I'll be looking for tomorrow's piece too, but
with the proviso that it's beginning to sound like an infomercial.
Posted by steve_jonesuk@...
12th Nov 2009
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!