Follow this blog:
RSS

Will the nation’s capital’s streetcars be built in this nation?

By | May 19, 2010, 2:00 AM PDT

There was a lot of excitement in Washington earlier this month, when one of the city’s shiny new red streetcars was on display and open to the public. Nearly 50 years after streetcars vanished from our city streets, the District is planning a 37-mile, eight-car system, and construction on two lines is underway. Service is expected to start in 2012.

D.C., which will host the national Rail-Volution conference next year, is issuing a request for information from industry experts on how to design additional streetcars—that can operate for limited distances without overhead wires. To learn more about the system, I talked to Gabe Klein, director of the District Department of Transportation, who said he wants Washington to have the first hybrid propulsion system in America.

Why did the streetcars go away in the first place?

Post World War II, you had people coming back and wanting to raise families. Everyone wanted a white picket fence in the suburbs and one car, if not two. It was the ultimate freedom. Living in an urban environment wasn’t as appealing. So our new auto economy out of Detroit decided they wanted to start making buses. Nationwide, the streetcar systems were turned over to the bus companies and then shut down, and buses were sold to municipalities. These little decisions people make completely alter the way we live.

I was talking to a family who has lived in D.C. for 67 years and was heartbroken when the streetcars shut down in 1962. She said, “I don’t think people realized the impact. That’s how people used to get around the city.” We joked that we’re repairing the damage that’s been done over the last 50 years.

D.C. Department of Transportation Director Gabe Klein

D.C. Department of Transportation Director Gabe Klein

Why now?

In the early 2000s we started looking at the streetcar. People are realizing, “Wow, maybe there’s a higher quality of life in the city. I don’t have to sit in the car for two hours commuting.” We’re giving people what they want. It’s unfortunate that we paved over a great system, and it’ll cost us $1.5 billion to put it back. But the new system will link people to jobs, link the east and west parts of the city and bring investment to these communities.

Now that the streetcar is returning, what role will it play in the whole transportation system?

Metro is a hub and spoke system–it primarily brings people in and out of the city. We started our own Circulator bus system that circulates people between neighborhoods. So the streetcar will complement the existing modes of transportation. There’s a chance we will replace a few bus lines, but our transit needs are growing. We have two lines of Metro that will be at capacity by 2013.

How will the streetcars be used differently than buses?

Each street car holds 162 people and is about a $3 million investment. It’s much more environmentally friendly. It’s quiet, smooth and a really high-quality transit system. But one of the most important things about fixed rail is that developers and the investment community—which are very important when you’re talking aobut bringing back a neighborhood—when they see a type of fixed investment, they’re much more likely to invest. The city is investing $63 million in the proposed budget for next year. That’s all local funds.

I understand the first three streetcars came from Prague? Where will the others be built?

When we shut down the streetcar systems nationally, there was no reason to build them here anymore. So an entire section of the rail industry went away. Europe was much more level-headed in what they did: They have tram, light rail, a streetcar system… and because of that, they have the manufacturing. We’re looking to have the first hybrid propulsion system in America. Recently United Streetcar in Portland was awarded a grant to build one car for us, with a hybrid, battery-powered system. They’re the first manufacturer to build a streetcar in the U.S. in 50 years.

Here’s a video from Portland-based United Streetcar, which has manufactured modern streetcars for Portland and Tuscon.

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Melanie D.G. Kaplan

About Melanie D.G. Kaplan

Melanie D.G. Kaplan is a contributing writer for SmartPlanet.

Melanie D.G. Kaplan

Melanie D.G. Kaplan

Contributing Writer

Melanie D.G. Kaplan is a regular contributor to The Washington Post and Nomad Edition's Good Dog and has written for The New York Times, National Geographic Traveler and People. She holds degrees from Syracuse University and Columbia University's Graduate School of Journalism. She is based in Washington, D.C.

Follow her on Twitter.

Melanie D.G. Kaplan

Melanie D.G. Kaplan

In addition to working as a journalist, Melanie keeps the dog food fund flush with occasional consulting jobs. In the unusual event that her writing mentions a company or organization for which she has provided editorial services, she will disclose that fact. She will do the same should she cover any companies in which she holds investments.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
10
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Will the nation's capital's streetcars be built in this nation?
Squeeze the size down, bring the passengers directly from point A to point B and you've got the future of transportation...

www.PRTProject.com

gary
Posted by gdstark13
19th May 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Will the nation's capital's streetcars be built in this nation?
I remember street cars from when I was a kid. Probably the only way to go if we're serious about cutting back on the need for multiple car families. Rails on the surface are a lot cheaper then underground. Easiest to create multiple routes in suburbs where the problem is how to get from your home to the train, and where to find a parking space.
Posted by bsfriedson@...
19th May 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Will the nation's capital's streetcars be built in this nation?
any trains, trams, streetcars etc are a headache for the cities due to accidents. look at the results from the cities and insurance companies that have them and you'll see the danger resulting from pedestrian and vehicle mishaps......
Posted by rjimu
19th May 2010
0 Votes
+ -
as always...
There's "more to the story."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_American_streetcar_scandal

GM, Firestone and Standard Oil, the main perpetrators, (there were others) actually conspired to destroy the world's best light rail system.

Not just street cars, but an entire railroad/light rail-interurban system was taken down on the premise of "the American dream."

At the time there were people screaming out that this was a huge mistake that WOULD come back to bite us in the rear one day. And here we are.

One of these days you whipper-snappers are going to wake up and realize, as the Firesign Theatre so eloquently (and humorously) told us: "everything you know is wrong."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Everything_You_Know_Is_Wrong
Posted by pgit
19th May 2010
0 Votes
+ -
Electric Vehicles
How ironic. We had them 50+ years ago and threw them away.

Now they're in vogue again.
Posted by oldbaritone
19th May 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Will the nation's capital's streetcars be built in this nation?
There is another darker aspect to the demise of streetcars.

In a few cities, auto and auto-supply companies, including General
Motors, Firestone Tire and Rubber Company, and Standard Oil of
California, mostly through a separate joint venture, bought an
interest in transit companies across the country, shut down the
trolleys and converted the systems from streetcar to bus. Ultimately
most systems were shut down in favor of the automobile. Many
histories of this effort say that was their long range goal from the
start.

Some cities made the choice to switch without this influence, though
it was significant and through advertising propelled a national
momentum towards the automobile. By 1937, 50 percent of the U.S.
cities that had public transit were served by buses alone and most
public transportation in all but the largest cities had disappeared
altogether by the end of the 50s.

Here's an excerpt from a history of LA which once had one of the
best public transportation systems (mainly streetcars) in the US:

"In the early 1940s, as the Japanese Empire was conspiring to
destroy ships and planes at Pearl Harbor, an automobile interest
group conspired to destroy trains and trolley cars across the
country. A front company (National City Lines) was formed to buy
up rail lines and close them down (every full train represents 1000
potential cars and customers). Their way was the highway: LA went
from having the world?s largest rail transit system (1920s-1940s) to
having almost three decades of freeway mania, with a commuting
choice of buses or cars. Now, only 12 per cent take public transport
to work."
Posted by dgm9sf@...
19th May 2010
0 Votes
+ -
Don't take the bait! It's a trap.
I grew up in Germany. I had no fewer than a dozen bus and streetcar line stops within a hundred yards of anyplace I lived there. I always wondered why we had both. It was during my internship at Daimler-Benz that I learned the awful truth: Rail is horribly inefficient and expensive. Rubber-tired cars, trucks, and buses on paved streets are vastly superior in every way.

Moreover, the true cost of all rail travel throughout Europe is hidden from the public and even from the riders themselves by way of those legendary gas prices we've all heard so much about over here, which are the result of 300% (yes, you read right, and it's sometimes even higher) taxation at the pump, and only at the pump.

In other words, every litre of petrol you purchase finances one typical trip for a typical streetcar passenger. The price the riders pay for tickets is just a token. And that's where the name comes from.

And why is this? Because the European railway unions are so powerful. If they had their way, you'd be riding their rails from door to door, from cradle to grave. And streets, tires, cars, and buses would be banned forever.

Want proof? Just google French railway strike, or British railway strike. When they decide they want more money, they shut down entire countries, even all of Europe.

Daimler even developed a special bus back in the 1980s that could ride either on normal city streets or on special, prefab, concrete 'tracks' that could just be dropped into place over meadow, marsh, or desert with minimal environmental impact. No longer did a new sub-development have to wait while the rail-crews tore up their streets and yards to lay down tracks. No longer did bicyclist and motorcyclists have to live in fear of washing out on slick, steel, rails. No longer did auto drivers need to watch out for an alien set of signals and traffic for fear of becoming a statistic under a 60 tonne indulgence.

But, when the unions got wind of it, they shut Europe down, under other pretenses of course, while back-room deals were being cut to ensure Daimler withdrew that product forever.

Tell me this, you geniuses of 'social planning'... Why is it that no one seems to feel it's worth their while to set up a private mass-transit system? Because there are no rails? Nonsense! Because they'd never make a profit. And the risk of government intervention, or even competition is too great. Then there's the liability aspect.

GM didn't need to put the Red-Line out of business. They were already bleeding red ink. All the other lines had already succumbed to the economic pressures of the far more attractive private option, the automobile. GM merely delivered the coup de grace, literally.
Posted by Gaius_Maximus
19th May 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Will the nation's capital's streetcars be built in this nation?
the streetcars didn't just shut down the car and oil companies
bought them all up, then shut them down! they were sued and were
fined in the early 50's $5500 (the courts were fixed)
Posted by bobdrake201
19th May 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Will the nation's capital's streetcars be built in this nation?
More links, more evidence,

http://www.intransitionmag.org/documents/scandal.html

"When an electric-powered transit system was purchased, it was converted quickly into a gasoline-powered bus company and then just as quickly, sold to new operators. Electric-powered streetcars were all replaced with either GM or Mack buses. Since an electric streetcar lasted three times longer than a bus, buses had to be replaced three times more often. Gasoline-powered vehicles meant much higher operating expenses. Many streetcar lines which had been profitable before, lost money for the first time."
Posted by Capt. Midnight
19th May 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Will the nation's capital's streetcars be built in this nation?
"It was during my internship at Daimler-Benz that I learned the awful truth: Rail is horribly inefficient and expensive. Rubber-tired cars, trucks, and buses on paved streets are vastly superior in every way."

You mean to say, a company that produces diesel cars, trucks,
and buses thinks they're better than trolleys? ( They're
certainly noisier and smellier ) Go figure! happy

Now if you were proposing trolley busses, or hybrid trolley /
diesel-electric busses ( what were called All Service Vehicles
in the 1940's, they could run under wire in the city and then
switch to a diesel-electric or gas-electric generator where there
were no wires ) I could agree with you.
Posted by Capt. Midnight
20th May 2010
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!