Follow this blog:
RSS

Why it makes economic sense to invest in national parks

By | March 4, 2010, 4:00 AM PST

We like to think of our parks as apolitical. The buffalo in Yellowstone and the bears in the Great Smoky Mountains don’t think too much about what happens on Capitol Hill. But the guy in charge of protecting these animals and their environments does have Capitol Hill on his mind, and he has one thing to say: Give us (or rather, the parks) the money.

Tom Kiernan, president of the National Parks Conservation Association, wrote last week in the Huffington Post:

“…despite President Obama’s 2008 campaign pledge, this Administration’s current budget does not address the funding shortfall national parks are facing. Due to years of inadequate funding, national parks such as the Grand Canyon and Yellowstone face a $580 million operating shortfall and have accumulated a $9 billion backlog of deferred maintenance work.”

Kiernan goes on to say that although the Park Service budget is just one tenth of 1 percent of the overall federal budget, the national parks support an estimated $13.3 billion of local private-sector economic activity and 267,000 private sector jobs. Every federal dollar invested in national parks, he writes, generates at least $4 in economic value to the public.

As the National Park Service approaches its 100th birthday in 2016, the NPCA is working on key areas—from wildlife to clean air–to make sure the parks are healthy and well-cared for. But despite the 5 percent park visitation increase since the recession began, and while the NPCA has been advocating to hire more park rangers to meet the needs of more families and school groups, underfunding will prevent the Park Service  from continuing to invest in those key areas.

That’s bad news for the animals and the rangers—and for all of us planning to hit a park this year.

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Melanie D.G. Kaplan

About Melanie D.G. Kaplan

Melanie D.G. Kaplan is a contributing writer for SmartPlanet.

Melanie D.G. Kaplan

Melanie D.G. Kaplan

Contributing Writer

Melanie D.G. Kaplan is a regular contributor to The Washington Post and Nomad Edition's Good Dog and has written for The New York Times, National Geographic Traveler and People. She holds degrees from Syracuse University and Columbia University's Graduate School of Journalism. She is based in Washington, D.C.

Follow her on Twitter.

Melanie D.G. Kaplan

Melanie D.G. Kaplan

In addition to working as a journalist, Melanie keeps the dog food fund flush with occasional consulting jobs. In the unusual event that her writing mentions a company or organization for which she has provided editorial services, she will disclose that fact. She will do the same should she cover any companies in which she holds investments.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

7
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
Are you kidding me?
Didn't the parks get about half their annual budget in the "stimulus" giveaway last year?

Oh, and the increase in entry fees is pointless if there is nobody at the gates to collect it. (This has happened to me several times, where at the entrance there's a sign that basically says "We'll get you at the back side, which they usually don't) Since the parks get the same amount of money regardless of what they collect at the gate, it makes more sense to deploy their people where they feel they're more needed. Just a single example of the brilliant management of our natural resources.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
4th Mar 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Why it makes economic sense to invest in national parks
I'm pretty sure the buffalo also don't care how much money goes to the national park. "Maintenance" will have no effect on the buffalo, whatsoever.

Maybe every "federal dollar generates $4 in economic value", on the back end", but how many tax dollars does it take to make up $1Federal?

The cost to the public, of having their money taken, transferred through about 50 different bureaucracies (which all have overhead costs, like payroll and employee benefits, building costs, heating and electric bills, etc).

Every "Federal dollar" that comes out of the public coffers, probably costs the taxpayers MUCH more than $4, before it ever gets to a national park.

Not really very good "investment" strategy, at least not to anybody who works for a living...
Posted by wrenchmonkey
4th Mar 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Why it makes economic sense to invest in national parks
wrenchmonkey makes a good point on the overhead of a Federal Dollar. Still, whatever the 'cost' of that Federal Dollar, not many programs can show they generate 4 Federal Dollars for each Federal Dollar spent (NASA being the only other one I've seen such data).

As a person working for a living, I would rather see Federal Dollars go to these programs and not for making a millionaire a multimillion dollar golden parachute (TARP).

By the way, for a program to generate 4 Federal Dollars, it must stimulate 10 GNP dollars (appx) to accomplish that feat.
Posted by Kansan52
11th Mar 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Why it makes economic sense to invest in national parks
The spread of 'National' parks, forests and monuments is a subtle Socialization of the country.

It is interesting to note that a major portion of the US's natural resources ie natrual gas, petrolium, etc. are controlled (and denied the people) by national parks, monuments, etc.

If utilized, these resources could pay off ALL national debt and still provide for America's energy needs for the next 50 years, allowing time to develope truely clean, economical energy sources. And yes, it is possible for wildlife, nature and gas wells to co-exist. Look at the vast herds of caribou feeding along side the wells and pipeline in Alaska, or the antelope, deer, elk and boar that are often seen right beside oil wells in the southwest.
Posted by NanoProgrammer
11th Mar 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Why it makes economic sense to invest in national parks
The Park Service is a bureaucratic mess. I have dealt with them for 39 years. Their reputation has always been an organization with poor management and a demoralized work force stangled by endless regulation.

The best thing that could happen to the Park Service is a 50% cut in administrative staff combined with a similar cut in regulation volume.

Administrator always claim lack of budget when the real problem is poor management and smothering regulation.
Posted by riverboss@...
11th Mar 2010
0 Votes
+ -
You can't be serious
Only a brainwashed university graduate could buy into the notion that each Fed dollar spent on the parks somehow generates up to four dollars of economic value. This is feather-headed nonsense. If it's so, why don't we spend 5 trillion dollars on them in order to generate 20 trillion dollars and pay off the national debt?
Posted by DJJazzyJeff
11th Mar 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Why it makes economic sense to invest in national parks
paraben sex shops por mais esse post
Posted by vipsexshop
14th Apr
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet Community and join the conversation! Signing-up is free and quick, Do it now, we want to hear your opinion.