Follow this blog:
RSS

T. Boone Pickens plans for 8 million trucks to run on natural gas

By | February 22, 2010, 4:00 AM PST

Texas billionaire T. Boone Pickens unveiled the Pickens Plan in 2008 to decrease our reliance on foreign oil. He recently tweaked the plan, shifting his focus from wind energy to natural gas and from cars to 18-wheelers and buses. Pickens is a big advocate of H.R. 1835, legislation introduced last April, which would offer significant tax credits for buyers of natural gas cars and their manufacturers and which would set regulations for vehicles purchased by the federal government. (Scroll down to see the Pickens Plan’s latest ad.)

I talked to Pickens last week as he flew to Orlando for the National Automobile Dealers Association convention, where he was a keynote speaker.

In your new commercial you say, “Go back to sleep America, the oil crisis is over.” Then you hear Middle Eastern-sounding music, and you say, “I don’t think so,” and you tell us that we’re importing as much as 70 percent of our oil, much of it from enemies. What kind of feedback are you getting on this?

Good. It’s pretty straightforward. The Arabs don’t like it.

You say cheap and easy oil is gone. Do most Americans understand that?

I was in the mall yesterday going to a movie, and the couple walking in said, “We’re with you.” So they understand it. We have the resource to replace foreign oil . Let’s use it and move forward. I think we’re at a tipping point. I think you’re going to get legislation passed, and then we’ll be on our way.

What do you expect to happen with the Natural Gas Act on Capitol Hill?

I think you’ll get legislation passed before Memorial Day. It’s Senate bill 1408 and House bill 1835. They’re written and ready to go. How can you be against depending on your own resources? Nobody wants to say, “I don’t like your plan.” They either support it or they’re quiet. If they don’t like it, they don’t say anything. If they aren’t for my plan, they’re for foreign oil, and nobody wants to be for foreign oil. Everybody sees the security issue–that is, you’re buying oil from the enemies. And everyone probably agrees you’re paying for both sides of the war. It’s not just dumb; it’s dumb-dumb.

Who are your biggest supporters?

The Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, and Steny Hoyer and John Larson in the House.

How many presidents have you talked to about our oil crisis?

The first was Ronald Reagan, and everybody since then.

When you last met with Obama, what did he say?

That was August ’08. He said could he take notes. I said sure. He had a lot of questions. When we got through he had a pretty good understanding. When he accepted the nomination the month before, he said in 10 years we won’t be importing oil from the Middle East.

What’s the model for this natural gas plan?

The model is 12 million vehicles in the world running on natural gas. Iran has gone to natural gas. Russians are going to it. The technology is well known. But if you want to look closer to home, go to Southern California. They had an air quality issue and said all new trash trucks purchased have to be natural gas. They didn’t make anyone get rid of anything, but they regulated the new ones. That’ s my plan for 18-wheelers in the future. My target is 8 million trucks, class five through eight. When I do something I want to do a model. I’m not an R&D guy. I figure 10 years for R and 10 years for D, and I’m 100 years old. It’s already operating, and we can follow good models.

Have you driven one of those 18-wheelers?

No, have you?

Not yet. What do the truckers think about it?

I think truck drivers are patriotic people. Properly presented to them, I think they’d make it their mission and carry it out.

What’s so great about natural gas?

It’s not going anywhere. It’s been there in the ground for millions of years. There’s an over-200-year supply for us. If you convert the natural gas to the barrel of oil equivalent, or BOE, you’re formidable. You’re bigger than Russia, Iran, Qatar. It’s right here in North America. It’s abundant, cheap, clean, and it’s ours. It’s a global energy game-changer.

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Melanie D.G. Kaplan

About Melanie D.G. Kaplan

Melanie D.G. Kaplan is a contributing writer for SmartPlanet.

Melanie D.G. Kaplan

Melanie D.G. Kaplan

Contributing Writer

Melanie D.G. Kaplan is a regular contributor to The Washington Post and WebMD and has written for The New York Times, National Geographic Traveler and People. She holds degrees from Syracuse University and Columbia University's Graduate School of Journalism. She is based in Washington, D.C.

Follow her on Twitter.

Melanie D.G. Kaplan

Melanie D.G. Kaplan

In addition to working as a journalist, Melanie keeps the dog food fund flush with occasional consulting jobs. In the unusual event that her writing mentions a company or organization for which she has provided editorial services, she will disclose that fact. She will do the same should she cover any companies in which she holds investments.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
33
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
RE: T. Boone Pickens plans for 8 million trucks to run on natural gas
Meanwhile the natural gas industry is destroying billions of gallons of groundwater with it's fracting methods
Posted by txadams66@...
22nd Feb 2010
0 Votes
+ -
Not true
1. The natural gas is extracted more than 1000 feet below the surface. The water table is not deeper than 500 feet. So, the water is not polluted.
2. Gas extraction companies are researching newer fracturing liquids that consist exclusively of harmless liquids. What will be your argument against gas extraction then?
3. CNG is still about $1.50 per gallon equivalent. In the meantime, gasoline is about $6.00/ga. I think new vehicles should offer a choice of fuels (e.g. gasoline, CNG, ethanol mix). You can drive yours on gasoline. I will drive mine on CNG. Thank you very much.
Posted by lou5
23rd Feb 2012
0 Votes
+ -
T. Boone Pickens had better see what's going on at UT Arlington
Researchers at the University of Texas in Arlington have developed a cheap method of converting Texas lignite coal into oil at the rate of 1.5 barrels of oil per ton of coal. With Texas lignite going for $18/ton, their manufacturing costs are $28.84 (source: Dallas Morning News (DMN), Saturday, 2/22/2010). Earlier articles in the DMN showed them getting oil at $35/barrel, the latest discoveries have dropped the manufacturing price significantly.

Summary:

Within a decade, and possibly five years, we will have access to a nearly unlimited supply of cheap oil. America's coal resources are the largest in the world.
Posted by LarryPTL
22nd Feb 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: T. Boone Pickens plans for 8 million trucks to run on natural gas
"Meanwhile the natural gas industry is destroying billions of gallons of groundwater with it's fracting methods"

Yes lets stick with oil, its so much cleaner and environmentally better.
Posted by zzzrsc
22nd Feb 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: T. Boone Pickens plans for 8 million trucks to run on natural gas
A basic problem with compressed natural gas for vehicles is, you need pressures of 3500 psi to get a decent range. That's why its a good idea to focus on school buses, transit buses, trucks, etc as the first to be powered by CNG.

Note that the 3500 psi storage pressure (when a vehicle is fully fueled) for natural gas, is less than the 5000 psi or more you need with hydrogen. So if we're going to use a light gas as a transportation fuel, I'd prefer natural gas.

For the cars most of us drive, I'd prefer that we continue research and development of ways to break down cellulose from various forms of biomass, into simple sugars for subsequent fermentation into ethanol. Right now, a large percentage of Chevrolets and other GM vehicles, are FlexFuel. So using ethanol/gasoline blends is the easiest way to displace foreign oil.

About electric cars: A high percentage of the electric power we use, comes from natural gas-fired turbines. So we need to ask: If the power to run a vehicle is going to come from NG, what's more efficient: A compressed natural gas-fired spark-ignition engine, or plugging an electric vehicle in for recharging from a NG-fired electric power station?
Posted by AlexKovnat
22nd Feb 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: T. Boone Pickens plans for 8 million trucks to run on natural gas
You can live a long time without oil or natural gas. You are not going to live very long without access to fresh water.
Posted by dbaechtel
22nd Feb 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Fresh Water Comments
The only problem with your logic on this is that the water table is
separated from the gas, where the fracturing takes place, by a few
thousand feet of rock.
Posted by Clint.Galliano
22nd Feb 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: T. Boone Pickens plans for 8 million trucks to run on natural gas
A 200-yr supply of natural gas sounds overly optimistic. It doesn't pass the smell test. 200-yr supply based on what usage forecasts? More realistic I would guess it's maybe a 50-yr supply.
Regardless, this is a stop-gap patch, not a long-term solution. We'd still be spewing massive levels of carbon and other pollutants into the air. Don't get me wrong, I think it's worth doing, but I fear it will take people's attention away from investing in truly renewable energy.
And before you label me a tree-hugger, I am for nuclear power. It's far cleaner than coal. Did you know the coal plants in the US combined spew out more radioactive material than all the waste from our nuclear plants? Yes, coal contains trace amounts of radioactive material, and we burn so much of it that the total amount is significant.
Posted by chefp
22nd Feb 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: T. Boone Pickens plans for 8 million trucks to run on natural gas
Thanks Chefp for mentioning nuclear power and the trace amounts of radioactive elements in coal.

I agree. Coal does in fact contain uranium and thorium, in amounts that depend on where mined. In addition, we also have to be concerned about mercury, which goes up the chimney when coal is burned. And there are other trace elements as well which, depending on where the coal was mined, include cadmium - an awful substance to have in your system.

We should remember that elements like lead, mercury and cadmium, precisely because they are not radioactive, remain environmentally and biologically active forever when discharged into the environment.
Posted by AlexKovnat
22nd Feb 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: T. Boone Pickens plans for 8 million trucks to run on natural gas
Nobody mentioned safety when discussing coal vs nuclear.
How many people have been killed/injured in the mining, transportation and burning of coal vs nuclear? I think the figures would shock most people.
And newer design nuclear power plants are far safer than any currently operating in the U.S. In addition, significant advances have been made in dealing with nuclear waste. Extraction of harmful material for re-use as well as sequestration and storage of the small remainder. It's time for America to get re-educated on this subject
Posted by raykirk@...
22nd Feb 2010
0 Votes
+ -
Largest suppliers
I'm pretty sure Canada is the largest supplier of oil to the USA, followed by Mexico. Both are hardly enemies. Even Saudi Arabia is considered a friend.
Posted by SMparky
22nd Feb 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: T. Boone Pickens plans for 8 million trucks to run on natural gas
I am with Mr.Pickens AND rest of alternate energy sources, as mentioned by others. What is more important is We, the American citizens needs to wake up and STOP these big corporations and bureaucrats sucking every drop of blood from their own countrymen. AMERICA IS NOT RUN BY OBAMA, CLINTON OR BUSH'S....IT IS RUN BY BIG CORPORATIONS, AND A FEW STRONG FAMILIES. I believe there is someone Outthere, who will wake up and come to the Salvation of American public, who are totally abused by the American system, so created by a few BIG GUYS>
Posted by qamerwahaj
22nd Feb 2010
0 Votes
+ -
Something no one ever takes into consideration...
Everyone talks about the economy of size and scale, but never the downside. Whenever you get millions of people doing anything there are always unintended consequences, many of them really bad and hard to change.

Maybe we should reconsider and think about how natural gas will affect the world in the long run so we don't dig a hole like the one we dug by basing our society on petroleum, another fossil fuel.
Posted by mikifinaz1@...
22nd Feb 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: T. Boone Pickens plans for 8 million trucks to run on natural gas
Summit Logistics is Canada Safeway Ltd.'s distribution arm in the Lower Mainland area of BC (including Vancouver). They were testing natural gas powered trucks years ago. I'm not sure how many of their trucks (if any) are still running on gas. Here's some pictures of some of their equipment:
http://www.hankstruckpictures.com/summit_logistics_burnaby2006.htm
Posted by Marc Erickson
22nd Feb 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: T. Boone Pickens plans for 8 million trucks to run on natural gas
This foreign oil stuff is another bunch of phoney-baloney. If the "progressives" in congress and the administration would let Americans drill for oil in our own waters and on our own land and build the first new refineries in 35 years, we'd be selling THEM oil for a good profit instead.
Posted by DavidMichaelMyers
23rd Feb 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: T. Boone Pickens plans for 8 million trucks to run on natural gas
"The only problem with your logic on this is that the water table is
separated from the gas, where the fracturing takes place, by a few
thousand feet of rock."

Tell that to the people in Colorado and Wyoming whose domestic well water has become highly flammable.
Posted by trapper
23rd Feb 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: T. Boone Pickens plans for 8 million trucks to run on natural gas
Where natural gas may be more abundant at present, it is certainly
not much better than oil in the environment.It still produces a
good amount of harmful damage to the environment. Why not just
work to develop less expensive solar panels, and use that source
of energy? Solar is a renewable energy with much less operating
expense than even wind. The cost to build, and operate wind
generators is very high compared to solar, and even takes as
much land area.

Additionally, there is an excellent method to run cars on an
electrical energy with a long drive time between battery charging.
A person can even purchase this system today to convert most
cars on the road. With the use of solar power these vehicles
can be recharged without the purchase of the high cost utility
power. The simple plug-in charging can even be done anywhere
there is a 110 volt AC supply. Each home can even have their
own solar system for electric power.

The cost factor in our society today IS controlled by only
the upper 8% of the society. Only the most wealthy, and the
major corporations derive benefit from our high costs of today.
Why allow that to continue while developing more for them alone?
Posted by DJnRF
23rd Feb 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: T. Boone Pickens plans for 8 million trucks to run on natural gas
Picken is a businessman , and we have paid for both sides of the war
by first supplying arms to Iraq and Afghanistan (see Charlie
Bartlet's war) and remember we invested highly in arms for the Iraq
Iranian war . It's all smoke and mirrors and no sooner do we go
natural gas we will find it in short supply (DIESEL was once cheap
so trucking companies went diesel and then auto makers followed and
the price went through the roof .). The only thing businessmen in
America love is MONEY , So any talk about buying patriotic oil is
motivated by MONEY . The same companies that want us to buy domestic
are the importers but they make more off oil fields they actually
own . America needs new energy sources period ,anything else just
puts more demand on sources already in use and makes more money for
the controllers of the source but does not solve consumer problems
with price .
Posted by jammerman0101@...
23rd Feb 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: T. Boone Pickens plans for 8 million trucks to run on natural gas
This just might be the biggest economic manipulation of the 21st century in the making.

My heating bill for natural gas increased 50 percent in the last year. What do you think will happen if we start burning the stuff in our cars? Who probably owns more gas wells than any other single person?

Pickens has the nerve to say that burning natural gas is good for the environment, when it's just another greenhouse gas producer. It's only one of the many lies of the profiteers (like "clean coal").

I think I'd rather have a handful of wimpy Arab sheiks squeezing my you-know-whats than old T Boone "Swift Boat" Pickens! Is everyone's memory that short?

Add into the mix the whole wind turbine issue, which allows Enron type companies to reap huge profits at the cost of government subsidies. Here in WV, they put wind turbines in inefficient locales, where they create a nuisance and kill birds and bats, simply because the government handout of our tax dollars makes it profitable. Worse yet, the wind turbines generate so-called "green credits", which result in a net increase of pollution.

My biggest fear is that profiteers and carpetbaggers like Pickens are going to amass wealth and power on the backs of the American public (as they always have), all in the name of the "greening" of America. Pickens is this problem on steroids - the worst example, and I shouldn't have to remind all of you of his politics. Do you all really want to subsidize that? Look what happened the last time Pickens decided to put some money into manipulating an election!
Posted by omb00900@...
9th Jun 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: T. Boone Pickens plans for 8 million trucks to run on natural gas
WHY WHY WHY are we still banging our heads against the fossil-
fuel drum? I don't get it. We have the brightest minds in the
world and we can't figure out how to transition from fossil fuels to
TRULY clean energy sources like wind and solar power? The
process by which natural gas is extracted from the ground is
anything but clean. Abrahm Lustgarten, just won the prestigious
Scripps Foundation's national journalism award for his
environmental reporting on the natural gas fiasco. You can read
the series here: http://www.propublica.org/series/buried-secrets-
gas-drillings-environmental-threat
"Drill, baby, drill" is NOT the answer. Renewable energy sources
are the future--they never run out, they never contaminate
drinking water, rivers, lakes or streams; they don't explode;
people and animals aren't killed because of 'spills.' And the
supply is truly endless--and waiting to be harnessed.




There are class action lawsuits in PA right now over the mess
they've created in the Pittsburgh area and Dimock. There was an
explosion just a few days ago in southwest/central PA that shot
fracking fluid and gas 75 ft into the air. The FAA still has a 3 mile
flight restriction around the area.
Posted by librarygrl
9th Jun 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: T. Boone Pickens plans for 8 million trucks to run on natural gas
I am not sure how to inject natural gas into a diesel type engine, but that is a logical place to make an incremental reduction in use of liquid petroleum. The number of truck stops that would need to add natural gas capability is small compared to the number of stations required for passenger cars and light trucks.

There are a lot of dreamers about windmills, electric cars, and solar panels. If practical at all they are far in the future. Natural gas could be NOW.

Liquid fuel is easy to handle and provides reasonable driving range with a reasonably small container (fuel tank). None of the dreams I have read have any reasonable approach to this problem.

I remember a fleet of mining trucks in the 1940s that ran on butane. I remember them having a sweet smelling exhaust and they were an alternative to diesel at that time..
Posted by pauc1
9th Jun 2010
0 Votes
+ -
Where's the infrastructure to support these vehicles?
I drove a CNG Crown Victoria for a few years before I became increasingly irritated with the lack of public pumping stations, and I replaced it with an gasoline pick-up truck that can be fueled at any street corner.

I don't see how this plan will succeed unless the primary focus is on public availability of the fuel. The problem is even more desperate when considering 18-wheelers. You'd first need to guarantee that every truck stop has a CNG pumping station, and I don't see that happening without a major incentive to these facilities. No company wants one of their rigs, full of cargo, to be stranded on the road-side due to fuel availability issues.

Then, of course, you'll need to argue why a commercial truck can get so many more MPG with diesel than on CNG, and at a much lower price. Diesel may be dirty, but it's still the most efficient option when hauling heavy loads for long distances. You'd need to fill with CNG several times when compared to one fill of diesel.

The only way CNG has a chance here is via filthy politics to artificially balance the cost through penalties for using the cheaper and more efficient fuel: diesel... and that's not fair to anyone but greenies who want to sleep easier at night.
Posted by Bit-Smacker
13th Jun 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: T. Boone Pickens plans for 8 million trucks to run on natural gas
AMERICA SHOULD DECLARE ITS ENERGY INDEPENDENCE

America has 1/4th the coal on planet Earth and 100 years worth of natural gas. If citizens demand it, these resources could be used to establish United States energy independence in a matter of a few years. Declaring our energy independence would greatly reduce the US trade imbalance, keep capital in this country for job creation and deny funds to Middle East terrorists.

Existing fleets of automobiles can readily be retrofitted to run on natural gas and would be more practical than subsidizing electric cars that have limited range and long recharge cycles.

BUT THE GLOBAL WARMING SCAM, FOREIGN TAX CREDITS, AND CAP & TRADE GUARANTEE THE STATUS QUO FOR INTERNATIONAL OIL COMPANIES, OPEC AND TERRORISM:
The oil embargo of 1973 began the greatest transfer of wealth in the history of the world. - RAL

Remember that game called what OPEC could buy, in 1975, the whole New York Times Company for one and a half hours' surplus. It could buy the Washington Post Company, with Newsweek and all its TV stations, with another one and a half hours' surplus. It could buy all the American media, ABC, CBS, the Los Angeles Times---the works---in a week, and it could buy all the stocks on the London exchange in eight months, arithmetically speaking. It takes a big scale to rock a big system. (from pgs. 243-244 Paper Money @1981 by Adam Smith hardback)

The United States agreed to transfer jobs and technology to developing countries under INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENT Algiers Declaration 1975

A major portion of the planned or new petrochemical complexes, oil refineries and fertilizer plants be built in the territories of OPEC Member Countries with the co-operation of industrialized nations for export purposes to the developed countries with guaranteed access for such products to the markets of these countries.

FOREIGN TAX CREDITS FOR INTERNATIONAL OIL COMPANIES
In 1977 Representative Benjamin Rosenthal of New York produced secret Internal Revenue Service documents going back to 1950. They showed that the tax laws of Saudi Arabia were drafted with the help of Aramco to call the added price of oil not a ??royalty?? or ??cost of doing business,?? as was proper, but an income tax.?? The Saudis did this knowing that income tax paid to a foreign country is deductible from the income taxes an oil company pays the United States on all income received in the United States by the parent firm. From The Media Monopoly by Ben H. Bagdikian

??This plan was approved in secret session of the National Security Council and carried out without any request for authorization by Congress. A quarter of a century later, when members of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee un-earthed details, the source of the king's added income had become too self-evident for comment.?? From Oil Power The Rise and Fall of An American Empire by Carl Solberg

??This practice, perfected in Saudi Arabia, was quickly adopted elsewhere. Eventually, every oil-producing nation where American companies had a concession enacted an income tax law to increase its oil revenue by tapping the foreign tax credit provision of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code.?? From pgs. 183-190 America: Who Really Pays The Taxes by Donald L.Barlett & James B. Steele paperback

??Since that time the major multinational U.S. oil companies have paid hardly a penny of U.S. income tax on their foreign income.?? page130 BANKS BORROWERS, AND THE ESTABLISHMENT
Posted by Repeal
18th Jun 2010
0 Votes
+ -
Gas is only part of the Picken's Plan
The total plan is to use a blended approach to ALL energy in the
US. Coal, Nuclear, Oil, Wind, Gas, Solar and Hydro.

If we could flip a switch, and mandate all energy in the US be
renewable, the capacity and the technology simply aren't there.

Picken's total plan is to use "inferior" energy sources to bridge
the gap to "superior" renewable energy sources.

The idea is to use these available sources until the capacity is
built up in renewables to replace the dirty sources. This will take
years, but by switching now to available energy, we get the
benefits of importing less and less oil.

Pickens often says the US is "the Saudi Arabia of wind." The
problem is putting a windmill up is kind of easy, hooking the wind
farm up to the grid is a problem.

Take the time to visit http://www.pickensplan.org and understand
that this is just one area of the overall plan that puts the US in an
ideal position to develop clean renewable energy for the long
term, and solve our short term problems also.
Posted by caspianhiro
18th Jun 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: T. Boone Pickens plans for 8 million trucks to run on natural gas
"Most interestingly, U.S. to make the total switch to renewable energy in the next ten years. Yes, you read that right: 100% renewables in ten years."

Regards,
Patio Umbrella
Posted by scott summers
29th Aug 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: T. Boone Pickens plans for 8 million trucks to run on natural gas
I understand how natural gas is better than oil in terms of pollution, but what exactly is its real benefits? Both are still a limited natural resource and need to be drilled offshore and transported. The real benefit of Pickens? Plan is that it raises awareness of the need for an alternative energy supply, but it doesn?t cover the issues of energy efficiency or sustainability.

Regards,
Matt
Trade Show Displays
Posted by mattkent
6th Feb 2011
0 Votes
+ -
offshore?
Matt,
Good questions, but I think most natural gas is produced on land, not off shore. I also have never heard of an offshore "natural gas" spill, like the BP gulf oil spill.
Scott
Trade Show Booths
Posted by ScottIs
Updated - 17th Aug 2011
0 Votes
+ -
RE: T. Boone Pickens plans for 8 million trucks to run on natural gas
I'd prefer that we continue research and development of ways to break down cellulose from various forms of biomass, into simple sugars for subsequent fermentation into ethanol.
logic immo
Posted by gonziwill
9th Feb 2011
0 Votes
+ -
RE: T. Boone Pickens plans for 8 million trucks to run on natural gas
I love T Boone but this is just a stupid idea.

Trade Show Display
Posted by carlo@...
23rd Feb 2011
0 Votes
+ -
RE: T. Boone Pickens plans for 8 million trucks to run on natural gas
yes sir, i under stand about natural gas but what i don't understand is products have already been invented to cut emmissions and increase mileage and were not used because big oil companys would not get their share of proceeds it would take monies out of their pockets. also i have worked in oil fields and have seenwhat big oil does.to increase thrie profits and it is wrong.edward brown@tootntuff1@verizon.net
Posted by tootntuff1@...
20th Apr 2011
0 Votes
+ -
RE: T. Boone Pickens plans for 8 million trucks to run on natural gas
yes sir please reply thank you
Posted by tootntuff1@...
20th Apr 2011
0 Votes
+ -
T. Boone is a dreamer.
I for one do not wish to be driving down the highway with 8 million very large NG bombs.
If you have ever witnessed an exploding NG tank its not a pleasant sight. Diesel does not explode, gasoline only explodes if you are running a low tank, ( I keep my tank filled over halfway at all times). In my opinion all the money Obama is wasting on Solar and Wind technology would be better spent on technology for Vehicles which can get 300 miles per gallon of gas. What people fail to understand is Engine makers have no incentive to create these type of engines because it cuts into their greedy bottom line, it also annoys investors. Electric cars are useless until we develope the super conductor, which if you remember our beloved Bill Clinton sold all our Super Collider technology to Norway for pennies on the dollar. Smashing Atoms is the future, in my opinion.
Posted by crb2012
27th Oct 2011
0 Votes
+ -
A natural gas vehicle or NGV is an alternative
A natural gas vehicle or NGV is an alternative fuel vehicle that uses compressed natural gas (CNG) or liquefied natural gas (LNG) as a clean alternative to other fossil fuels. Milwaukee Moving Company
Posted by arthurarnold95
11th Jun
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!