Follow this blog:
RSS

Is the IPhone bad for innovation?

By | December 18, 2009, 3:00 AM PST

According to Harvard Law professor Jonathan Zittrain…Yes. In this compelling video from BNET, Zittrain walks us through the flow of innovation and demonstrates that while you may have the amazingly wonderful IPhone and I may have a dazzling app for it, we won’t be interacting without first identifying ourselves to Apple and gaining approval. He also reminds of some other innovative new platforms where unlike a truly open market a corporation still controls all engagement.

[video=369683-BNET]

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Vince Thompson

About Vince Thompson

Vince Thompson was a contributing editor for SmartPlanet from 2009 to 2010.

Vince Thompson

Vince Thompson

Contributing Editor, People

Vince Thompson is a digital revenue consultant, author, speaker and host of the popular BNET show Dog and Pony. His firm Middleshift LLC helps Internet companies build revenue by creating advertising solutions and scaling sales efforts. He is based in Los Angeles.

Follow him on Twitter.

Vince Thompson

Vince Thompson

Vince Thompson is the managing partner of Middleshift LLC, a digital revenue consultancy specializing in helping media companies sell online advertising.

Within the scope of his consultancy Vince works with a number or startups as well as major media companies and in many cases holds stock in those companies as well.

Vince is also the founder of Media2Watch LLC, parent company of Girl2Watch.com, a consumer content company that profiles up and coming actors and the shows they are going to be in and them connects them with audiences.

If at the time he writes an article or post he has a business relationship or investment related to the company or person featured, Vince will disclose his involvement. He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
7
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Is the IPhone bad for innovation?
Laughable speech.
The speaker knows very little about if anything about
engineering and even less about the software business One of
the very reasons why Windows is such a mess is that it is open
in the sense that anyone call write and deploy apps on it. Now
the Windows platform is loaded with so much crape-ware,
bloatware and viruses. That is the very reason many users
move to mac and linux while most corporates use SUN or Linux
as server OS's. iPhone is a platform to host applications.
It is simply good business and engineering sense to filter out
the garbage before letting applications be deployed on the
platform. It does not stop innovation, rather is enhances it by
forcing developers to write good apps using good code. If
there was no check in place, many many apps would be
deployed for not so admirable purposes.

Please Mr Law Professor, Keep your lectures to what you know,
namely the law and leave technology to the technologists. And
in case you are wondering , I am an IT Director for a global
company.
Posted by jk3021
18th Dec 2009
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Is the IPhone bad for innovation?
Any product/platform that closes out or excludes "wild card" software is by definition a barrier to innovation.

With the iPhone Apple is putting an artificial barrier on what is considered to be innovation, this runs contrary to the PC/Internet revolution.

So we need to encourage developers on the Android and Blackberry platforms to show true innovation and thinking outside the box.
Posted by tom@...
18th Dec 2009
0 Votes
+ -
I see it differently....
Apple and the iPhone represent controlled innovation, Google Android
represents more of a free for all. Between Apple, Google, Palm, RIM, Nokia
and Microsoft, there's going to be some bruising competition, which is good
for the consumer and innovation. Within the iPhone App store ecosystem
there's going to be some bruising competition in every category of
application because there are so many apps. That's good for the consumer
and innovation.

The speaker assumes that the negatives of having your code QA'd and
approved by Apple outweigh the positives of having a centralized
marketplace where your app can be found and where small developers can
make a living without dedicated marketing teams.

The speaker also ignores the rather obvious evidence that innovation had
stagnated in the world of SmartPhones BEFORE the iPhone and its App Store
showed up and re-invigorated the market.

I for one am expecting some pretty startling innovation over the next 3
years in the space. The winner gets to sell hundreds of millions of handsets
ever year.
Posted by mrs1622
18th Dec 2009
0 Votes
+ -
It's a competitive advantage/disadvantage
You can choose to buy an iPhone and get the benefits and limitations that Apple enforces for that device/OS/app store or you can choose a competitive device/OS/no-single-store such as Google Andoid that does not have the limitations Apple enforces.

Android apps may be sold or offered for free by anyone (on any website) without restriction by any organization such as Google.

This competition will prove which app delivery strategy provides more innovation.
Posted by gmeader
18th Dec 2009
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Is the IPhone bad for innovation?
@jk3021

Kindly take off those rose coloured glasses... it is altering your sense of reality. Whilst I can see some sense in your reasoning, it still is only one perspective on the matter.

If Apple was using the process to simply filter out erroneous code, or malicious/illegal apps, then sure I'd agree with you... but they are not. ANYTHING which in any way deviates from the Apple philosophy, or alters the "Apple user experience" is blocked... the Google Voice and Google Wave are two examples of iPhone Apps which Apple blocked under the guise of just that reasoning... no giving the end-user any choice in the matter short of Jail Breaking their device.

To put it bluntly, it is Apple's militant user policies which over a period turned myself from a Mac lover to a Mac hater. They may well make great hardware/software, but if the end-user is prevented from tweaking the system in a way that it ensures it best fits their needs - for no better reason than "that's not the way we intended the "user experience" to be like - then they can bugger off!


Also your comparison btwn Windows and "Mac and Linux" is completely wrong.... Linux has MORE application options than either of the other OS forms, and ALSO (in most cases) has none of the installation limitations of Apple's own offerings, and NONE of the customisation limitations Apple is well known for!
Posted by kaninelupus
19th Dec 2009
0 Votes
+ -
One of those "What's the Point?" Things.
Just for the sake of his "What's the point?" argument, it's spelled lowercase "I",
capital "P" lowercase "HONE". iPhone. Not IPhone. What's the point?
Membership of the Apple Nazis. XD
Posted by Ktroje
19th Dec 2009
0 Votes
+ -
Immaterial
his speech is nice but immaterial. he obviosuly haven't been exposed to the many 'innovative' malware and crashes of windows. and he obviously isnt much of a gamer because then he will know how many games with unfinished coding and programming were rushed out in the name of innovation to cheat consumers money.

just look at facebook. so many facebook applications. so innovative right?
how many of those quizzes and programs are just plain? besides getting approval doesnt mean an end to innovation. it just means u have to be good.
Posted by SaintDL
22nd Dec 2009
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!