Follow this blog:
RSS

Inside UnitedHealth Group’s national telemedicine initiative

By | June 17, 2010, 4:00 AM PDT

UnitedHealth Group, which serves more than 75 million people, is rolling out a telemedicine initiative. The insurer hired as its vice president and medical director for telehealth Dr. James Woodburn to advance telehealth across the company — and across the country.

I spoke recently with Woodburn about Connected Care, which is described as “the first, national telehealth network that will connect patients to leading primary care physicians, specialists and hospitals, regardless of location.”

How does Connected Care differ from other telemedicine efforts?

We’ve spent a lot of time over the last almost two years now looking at multiple areas. We have hardware, cameras, high-definition flat panel LCD screens, electronics that control the data input so pictures can go from one location to another. We’ve worked on clinical training. We’ve worked on marketing advice for the doctors. But most importantly, we spent a lot of time in the software programming to allow the system to function intuitively, effectively, confidentially. That’s really the difference from other products that have been around for 20 or 30 years. It’s really the full package of the training, oversight and software the drives everything in a very seamless and intuitive way.

Explain how the software works intuitively.

We’ve all learned from Apple computers that if you can just push a button, magic happens. We spent a lot of time with our graphical user interface, the actual screens that show up on the computer system. They describe in English the step that needs to happen. For example, we have a full scheduling system embedded into our platform. With some simple point and click and keyboard entry, appointments can be booked very easily.

Talk a bit about the system’s hardware.

The hardware is an important part of the puzzle. We started out with a Cisco system, very high-definition, top of the line camera. A company in Boston is our supplier of stethoscopes, movable examination cameras that we can use to zoom in on a patient’s skin rash. We can look down the throat or in the nose. Those are the two main components. One is the camera and TV screen, so the doctor can see the patient and the patient can see the doctor. Then there is the examination equipment, so the medical attendant or the nurse sitting next to the patient can be the hands and the eyes of the doctor who is sitting 10 miles or 1,000 miles away. That similar setup was what astronauts have used.

How do patients access the system?

The patients does have to go to a clinic where a medical attendant will be in an examination room. Our system will be in there and that attendant will have been trained to work on our system and to be the partner of the doctor during that clinical evaluation.

Do you have systems already operating?

We actually have had our own telemedicine clinic running here in Minnesota since last September. This is a clinic located in our headquarters where our employees can get a telemedicine evaluation by a doctor who is about 10 miles away. We’re also involved in the Cisco systems San Jose clinic pilot which began almost two years ago. We’ve launched our clinical program in Colorado. That’s going to be equipping three provider locations with four rural Colorado locations, so the doctors at Centura Health will be able to reach patients in four distant locations. We’ve also launched a mobile telehealth unit specifically for New Mexico.

How much does it cost to launch a system?

We have a variety of service agreement prices. Generally speaking, for a few thousand dollars a month, the clinic we’re working with would pay us for that service that includes all the hardware costs, the software, the clinical education, the training, the marketing material, the connection fees, malpractice.

What’s the reasoning behind launching and promoting system? Does it have to do with the doctor shortage?

Physician shortage certainly is critical and it’s an element that we’re addressing with our telemedicine program. But first and foremost, it’s to speed the access to care for patients that are in need. It takes hours to get across the Rockies. Being able to provide much more convenient and much faster access to important clinical evaluation management by doctors on the other side of the Rockies, that improvement of access leads to greater satisfaction of the patient. It also improves the quality of care. If you can see your doctor to get your ailment treated quicker, chances are it’s not going to get worse in the meantime. We improve access and we improve the quality of care. When you do those two things the cost of care will go down.

What are the problems with these systems? Isn’t there a risk of misdiagnosis when the doctor isn’t in the room with the patient?

In the hundreds of articles published over the last four decades, that is not a problem that is of major significance. What we learned along the way is that there are times when a patient should not be seen using telemedicine. The skill and the training of the practitioner who is there with the patient, the quality of the diagnostic, the implementation of electronic health records [are all] safety nets to make sure that potential scenario of a misdiagnosis is minimized.

What do you see in the future of telemedicine?

Part of the important and valuable elements of the health reform package includes direction to Medicare and Medicaid plans to increase their coverage for telemedicine services. We expect and anticipate that there will be more coverage for telemedicine services that will markedly accelerate the adoption of the technology. UnitedHealth Group, from a commercial payer perspective, made the decision to pay for a telemedicine visit at the same rate as face-to-face visits for the providers in our network and for beneficiaries covered under our plan. We believe that should [other] health plans provide more reimbursement for telemedicine that providers [would] be much more enthusiastic to get the system set up. The third thing that’s working in everybody’s behalf is the federal stimulus money that’s going to pay for high bandwidth connectivity in rural locations around America. These are all fairly new and very significant changes in the landscape to where now the cusp of telemedicine application has been reached.

Image, top: Connected Care / Courtesy of United Health Group

Image, bottom: Dr. James Woodburn / Courtesy of UnitedHealth Group

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Christina Hernandez Sherwood

About Christina Hernandez Sherwood

Christina Hernandez Sherwood is a contributing writer for SmartPlanet.

Christina Hernandez Sherwood

Christina Hernandez Sherwood

Contributing Writer

Christina Hernandez Sherwood has written for the Los Angeles Times, Newsday, the Philadelphia Inquirer, Diverse: Issues in Higher Education and Columbia Journalism Review. She holds degrees from the University of Delaware and Columbia University's Graduate School of Journalism. She is based in New Jersey.

Follow her on Twitter.

Christina Hernandez Sherwood

Christina Hernandez Sherwood

In the unlikely event that Christina has a professional or financial relationship with a company she writes about, it will be prominently disclosed.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
3
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Inside UnitedHealth Group's national telemedicine initiative
Telemedicine is a wave of the future. Already, when you go for tests (MRI, CT, etc) the results are sent to experts to evaluate, then the results are given to the doctor. The impact to rural areas are immeasurable. With this people that could be hours from medical facilties, could get life saving help much faster.
Posted by DadsPad
17th Jun 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Inside UnitedHealth Group's national telemedicine initiative
Electronic communication will remake my field of diagnostic radiology entirely in 5-10 years. Only larger hospitals will have a full staff of radiology specialists and subspecialistgs onsite. Smaller hospitals, especially in rural and more-isolated areas, will be staffed by a radiologist who is subspecialized in interventional radiology, but also able and willing to do other procedures that require a doctor onsite, such as barium GI studies. Whether or not there is just one such radiologist, or two or three, will depend on whether such onsite services need to be provided on a 24-hour basis or not. Of course, there will have to be an extra doc, or one who rotates, to allow for days off and vacations.

All other cases will be referred to offsite radiologists by teleradiology, and referred to sub-sub-specialists. By that, I mean not just someone familiar with one imaging modality, such as CT, or one area of the body, such as musculoskeletal, but with one particular organ or system. This will allow the "best of the best" to evaluate each case- wherever the patient may actually be physically located!

This will obviously be best for the patient. What it means for the radiologist depends on his field of interest. Most interventional radiologists- those not located in the major metropolitan centers- will have to be willing to do other work, if they're to be the only one physically present at a smaller hospital. Specialists will have to subspecialize further, and develop limited areas of expertise. The gerneral radiologist, like me, who does most of the day-to-day reading of the vast majority of average cases, but doesn't do specific things, such as interventional procedures, will go the way of the dodo. (BTW, don't feel sorry for me- I'm retiring in 1-2 years.) And essentially all of us will be employed physicians, working for big corporate groups like United HealthCare, and the private practice of radiology will become extinct.

If you're a radiologist who wants regular hours, a job not at the whims of hospital administrators, and a reasonable paycheck, you'll welcome the change. If you want to have a practice where you can rake off megadollars off the backs of employed radiologists and junior partners, you better be one of those forming a future megagroup, or be the head honcho of one that already exists. The future is pretty clear, whether you like it or not.
Posted by WanderMouse
18th Jun 2010
0 Votes
+ -
What are Stem Cells?
Stem cells are ???non-specialized??? cells that have the potential to form into other types of specific cells, such as blood, muscles or nerves. They are unlike "differentiated" cells which have already become whatever organ or structure they are in the body. Stem cells are present throughout our body, but more abundant in a fetus.
Medical researchers and scientists believe that stem cell therapy will, in the near future, advance medicine dramatically and change the course of disease treatment. This is because stem cells have the ability to grow into any kind of cell and, if transplanted into the body, will relocate to the damaged tissue, replacing it. For example, neural cells in the spinal cord, brain, optic nerves, or other parts of the central nervous system that have been injured can be replaced by injected stem cells. Various stem cell therapies are already practiced, a popular one being bone marrow transplants that are used to treat leukemia. In theory and in fact, lifeless cells anywhere in the body, no matter what the cause of the disease or injury, can be replaced with vigorous new cells because of the remarkable plasticity of stem cells. Biomed companies predict that with all of the research activity in stem cell therapy currently being directed toward the technology, a wider range of disease types including cancer, diabetes, spinal cord injury, and even multiple sclerosis will be effectively treated in the future. Recently announced trials are now underway to study both safety and efficacy of autologous stem cell transplantation in MS patients because of promising early results from previous trials.
History
Research into stem cells grew out of the findings of two Canadian researchers, Dr???s James Till and Ernest McCulloch at the University of Toronto in 1961. They were the first to publish their experimental results into the existence of stem cells in a scientific journal. Till and McCulloch documented the way in which embryonic stem cells differentiate themselves to become mature cell tissue. Their discovery opened the door for others to develop the first medical use of stem cells in bone marrow transplantation for leukemia. Over the next 50 years their early work has led to our current state of medical practice where modern science believes that new treatments for chronic diseases including MS, diabetes, spinal cord injuries and many more disease conditions are just around the corner.
There are a number of sources of stem cells, namely, adult cells generally extracted from bone marrow, cord cells, extracted during pregnancy and cryogenically stored, and embryonic cells, extracted from an embryo before the cells start to differentiate. As to source and method of acquiring stem cells, harvesting autologous adult cells entails the least risk and controversy.
Autologous stem cells are obtained from the patient???s own body; and since they are the patient???s own, autologous cells are better than both cord and embryonic sources as they perfectly match the patient???s own DNA, meaning that they will never be rejected by the patient???s immune system. Autologous transplantation is now happening therapeutically at several major sites world-wide and more studies on both safety and efficacy are finally being announced. With so many unrealized expectations of stem cell therapy, results to date have been both significant and hopeful, if taking longer than anticipated.
What???s been the Holdup?
Up until recently, there have been intense ethical debates about stem cells and even the studies that researchers have been allowed to do. This is because research methodology was primarily concerned with embryonic stem cells, which until recently required an aborted fetus as a source of stem cells. The topic became very much a moral dilemma and research was held up for many years in the US and Canada while political debates turned into restrictive legislation. Other countries were not as inflexible and many important research studies have been taking place elsewhere. Thankfully embryonic stem cells no longer have to be used as much more advanced and preferred methods have superseded the older technologies. While the length of time that promising research has been on hold has led many to wonder if stem cell therapy will ever be a reality for many disease types, the disputes have led to a number of important improvements in the medical technology that in the end, have satisfied both sides of the ethical issue.
CCSVI Clinic
CCSVI Clinic has been on the leading edge of MS treatment for the past several years. We are the only group facilitating the treatment of MS patients requiring a 10-day patient aftercare protocol following neck venous angioplasty that includes daily ultrasonography and other significant therapeutic features for the period including follow-up surgeries if indicated. There is a strict safety protocol, the results of which are the subject of an approved IRB study. The goal is to derive best practice standards from the data. With the addition of ASC transplantation, our research group has now preparing application for member status in International Cellular Medicine Society (ICMS), the globally-active non-profit organization dedicated to the improvement of cell-based medical therapies through education of physicians and researchers, patient safety, and creating universal standards. For more information please visit http://www.neurosurgeonindia.org/
Posted by Leo Voisey
26th Mar
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!