Follow this blog:
RSS

How to combat global warming — by overcoming evolution

By | February 25, 2010, 3:59 AM PST

Andrew Shatte blames evolution for our slow response to global warming. An expert on resilience, Shatte sites our mixed up fear sensors (terrified of spiders, but not heart disease?) and our slow-to-evolve senses (can’t smell carbon dioxide, but we can spot a lion in the grass!) as among the evolutionary reasons why we’ve yet to take global warming seriously. He outlined that view in my post yesterday.

Today, I’m highlighting Shatte’s solutions. When we spoke last week, he described several ways we can beat back those genetic pulls and work toward curbing climate change.

Tune in our frontal lobes: “That part of the brain — just behind the forehead — really separates us from other primates. It gives us the ability to problem solve, to foresee, [to have] empathy. It’s the rational part. It has the ability to overwhelm some of the earlier wiring in our brain. That frontal lobe that can steer us in another direction… I may be wired to fear snakes and spiders, but I can also say to myself, “The biggest threat to me is not a spider or a snake, it’s cardiovascular disease. So I’m going to eat more healthfully.” People do that everyday, but it only happens when you’re consciously aware of limitations. Then we can potentially rise above the tyranny of our genes.”

Add more car pool lanes: “We’re basically selfish, we don’t like to cooperate. [But] what we should do is have three car pool lanes and only one single vehicle lane. We’ll give up that right in order to curb our carbon dioxide emissions from our vehicles. That takes an enormous amount of social will. Carpooling just doesn’t come naturally to us. In order to curb our natural tendencies, we need to institute policies that will force us to do that. That gets really tricky, saying to people, ‘You surrender your rights to some sort of central body.’ But I think that’s what going to be required.”

Put global warming front and center: “Maybe [we could have] a visual billboard that shows us the effect of global warming in parts of the world where we’re not. If we were confronted with that everyday, our sensory system might be a little different.”

Shift our spending: “Each year, we spend $50 billion on cosmetics and beauty products. That’s a hard-wired evolutionary pull to do that. We want to look attractive because that attracts a mate. If we were to curb that kind of spending and funnel it to global warming, we may have a fighting chance.”

Use our memes to overwhelm our genes: “Humans are unique in that we have a culture. These cultural ideas which [Richard Dawkins] called “memes” replicate through the culture just like genes do. It’s the most successful ideas that get transferred down the generations. A meme can overwhelm a gene. A concept that we have in our minds can affect our behavior and short-circuit the hard wiring in our genetics, if we allow it to. When memes change, our behavior changes.”

Photo: Courtesy of Andrew Shatte

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Christina Hernandez Sherwood

About Christina Hernandez Sherwood

Christina Hernandez Sherwood is a contributing writer for SmartPlanet.

Christina Hernandez Sherwood

Christina Hernandez Sherwood

Contributing Writer

Christina Hernandez Sherwood has written for the Los Angeles Times, Newsday, the Philadelphia Inquirer, Diverse: Issues in Higher Education and Columbia Journalism Review. She holds degrees from the University of Delaware and Columbia University's Graduate School of Journalism. She is based in New Jersey.

Follow her on Twitter.

Christina Hernandez Sherwood

Christina Hernandez Sherwood

In the unlikely event that Christina has a professional or financial relationship with a company she writes about, it will be prominently disclosed.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
21
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
RE: How to combat global warming - by overcoming evolution
Imagine if most of the commuters would be carpooling... there would be to many parking spaces in the city and it would be so much easier to drive in the rush hour !

I tried the carbon dioxide and driving cost calculator of the carpooling network ( www.carpoolingnetwork.com ) and they suggest huge savings : up to 2000 $ and 1,5 tonnes per year.

Pete
Posted by pete926
25th Feb 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: How to combat global warming - by overcoming evolution
I agree with everything but carpooling. I live outside of Phoenix which is a large city when you consider the metropolitan area is about 60 miles by 50 miles. Carpooling works in those cities with a large downtown area that has a big concentration of workers; Phoenix does not have that. What is needed differs for each city; there is not one answer.
Posted by richphx
25th Feb 2010
0 Votes
+ -
Verify the threat is real and that we are really a contributor.
The folks in East Anglia exercised their frontal lobes quite a bit to fudge the numbers and to marginalize any scientist who found conflicting evidence -- regardless of how highly-regarded that scientist may have been previously. If he didn't drink the global warming Kool-Aid, that person and anyone who published his/her findings were ostracized.
Posted by DittoHeadStL
25th Feb 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: How to combat global warming - by overcoming evolution
Al Gore without the hair. How people spend their discretionary income is their own business. We don't need ultra greens to try make those decisions for them. Seems like the main problem with Andrew is that he never learned to mind his own business. I run into people like that all the time and am not bashful about telling them to butt out. Right now we should take common sense steps to minimize greenhouse gases, but doing things that might cripple our economy shouldn't be one of them. Authors making 5 to 10 times the income of the general economy probably don't appreciate what a 5 to 10% increase in prices can do an already threadbare budget. This guy should be on Obama"s payroll if he isn't already. He sure comes off as a "Died in the Wool" Liberal Democrat.
Posted by rgeiken@...
25th Feb 2010
0 Votes
+ -
Did the article really require...
A 3 Megabyte image of a balding man? We might not be able to outsmart evolution, but surely we can save some bandwidth.
Posted by klockheed
25th Feb 2010
0 Votes
+ -
Didn't evolution kill off all the phonies?
Apparently not as we have posts like this. Evolution has helped us evolve our brains and be able to see what a scam really looks like. Nice ideas to save and conserve, but I lose interest when I start hearing words like "it will be ok if you fund this research" and/or 'buy these carbon credits, but don't ask where the money goes."

Oh wait, maybe the demise of the folks in East Anglia and all the others is really just evolution kicking in.
Posted by rpwillia0@...
25th Feb 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: How to combat global warming - by overcoming evolution
this character does not come off as a dyed in the wool democrat but as a complete idiot. why should anyone tell people in a society what they can and cannot spend their money on. what makes a thing like cosmetics so unimportant that this 'far thinker' believes we should kill the whole industry and have people spend their funds on what he believes is important? people like that are a joke.
in the past it was make those poor people stop buying soft drinks and make them drink milk, cause they do not deserve to waste their money.
this guy ought to be locked up on a charge of sheer stupidity.
Posted by stilt21
25th Feb 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: How to combat global warming - by overcoming evolution
It really steams these green elitist that the decision will be a political one made by a majority more concerned with earning a living rather than by a relative handful of scientists who must prove global warming is a fact in order to continue receiving government grant money.

FYI: Rumor has it gas will be $3 a gallon shortly. I suggest you elitist run for the hills before you get tarred and feathered. America has 1/3rd of the coal on planet Earth and lots of natural gas and can create jobs in America, reduce the trade deficit, declare energy independence, cease transferring wealth to and fighting wars with nations in the middle east. The major stumbling block is the pseudo science that has redefined plant food, CO2, as pollutant.
Posted by Repeal
25th Feb 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: How to combat global warming - by overcoming evolution
another thought on mr.shatte(is that past tense by the way)is that for all his deep thinking he apparently has given no thought at all to what would happen if we stopped buying cosmetics and brought the industry to a stop. the personal cost to mr shatte would be that the whole financial system would collapse because we now would have broken the stock market and we would now be responsible for the care and feeding of a couple of million people out of work.
let mr shatte contemplate that for a bit, while doing his deep thinking.
may we be rid of thoughts as shatte delivered to us.
Posted by stilt21
25th Feb 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: How to combat global warming - by overcoming evolution
i can see that smartplanet believes in censorship and has deleted my sarlier comments. is this anyway for a blog supposedly dedicated to science to act. shameful is the word that comes to mind, though other words could be used but are not proper.
Posted by stilt21
25th Feb 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: How to combat global warming - by overcoming evolution
How dare Mr Shatte tell Americans that they can't just go on doing whatever they feel like doing with no regard for the consequences. And shame on all those nasty scientist for not telling us that everything is going to be okay, and we can continue to burn through finite energy reserves like a drunken sailor burns through a paycheck. Good thing God is on Americas side, and with his help, and a few trillion dollars spent on weapons and war, you Yanks can keep on consuming the vast majority of the worlds resources. What he fails to recognize, is that America has already overcome evolution. Never change, never evolve, ignore things you don't like. Man, what a country.
Posted by fletchoid
25th Feb 2010
0 Votes
+ -
and shame on all those nasty scientists...
for fudging the numbers at East Anglia and tgrying to discredit anyone who exposed the truth. When will the global warming crowd wake up and realize that the jig is up? I have not heard any kind of defense of what went on there... because there is none. Scientists are supposed to be objective and detached in a search for the truth. East Anglia was the exact opposite. Of course, the story hasn't really circulated very much because the mainstream media is also complicit in the global warming hoax.
Posted by DittoHeadStL
26th Feb 2010
0 Votes
+ -
Myth
Global warming is a myth created to cause panic (and to make $$)
When these "scientist" can predict the weather TOMORROW, I MAY believe they can predict what will happen in the distant future..
What effect does the sun have on "global climate change",
why did the first earth age REALLY happen (forget the comet as there was never concrete proof)
Explain "greenland and iceland"... They were named that way for a reason.. That was "pre" pollution...
How much of an effect do humans really present..

It started with "pollution" and the "hole in the ozone layer".
Then it moved to "depletion of fossil fuels"
Next was "global warming"
Now... Global climate change...
What caused iceland to become "green" and Greenland to be covered in ice? I can assure you it was nothing humans have done..
Posted by paulirock
26th Feb 2010
0 Votes
+ -
Global Warming Denier Goons
Newsflash: you're on a "green" blog. If you mental pygmies want to rant about how thousands of scientists are wrong and you're right, please go back to posting on Free Republic or Drudge.
Posted by rrusson_z
26th Feb 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: How to combat global warming - by overcoming evolution
it is amazing how people like paulirock managed to get thru life by denying all that so many of educated people have discovered with hard work. it costs nothing to deny , deny, deny, but it takes work, honest labor to dig out facts and prove them over and over.
pauli's comments show what common sense will get you.
Posted by stilt21
26th Feb 2010
0 Votes
+ -
NewsFlash...
"Green" bloggers need to see the greatest hoax in history for what it is. That's why I'm writing here. Believe it or not, thousands of scientists DISAGREE with the global warming crowd. 31,486 to be exact -- 9,029 of which have a PhD.

Stilt21... not sure which side you're on, here. First, you say the cost of Schatte's ideas "would be that the whole financial system would collapse because we now would have broken the stock market and we would now be responsible for the care and feeding of a couple of million people out of work." Then you criticize Paulirock for pointing out past mistakes in the scientific community. The effect of Cap & Trade or any other type of Carbon Tax will have just the effect you described, to one degree or another. But I'm having trouble figuring out your stance.

Bottom Line: If the global warming (now it's "climate change" because they really don't know which way it's going) believers are objectively seeking the truth, then I want an explanation of what happened at East Anglia. Why did "so many of educated people" [sic] see the need to obfuscate the results of certain pieces of data that didn't fit their agenda? Why did "so many of educated people" try to discredit respected colleagues who discovered conflicting data?
Posted by DittoHeadStL
26th Feb 2010
0 Votes
+ -
...through professionalism and consciousness!
I find it incredible how this sight can consider itself with any level of credibility. I guess there is no more journalism in the U.S. but propagandists acting like trolls spewing the indigos via one sides articles of their cooperate master.

How do we know this is true? A sight dedicated to scientific knowledge and the advancement of man would take the opportunity to present both sides data on any particular issue and allow the community to peer review for themselves. Instead the articles at SmartPlanet are always of the same nature with the same perspective. That approach is neither scientific nor journalistic. The role of a scientist is to prove a theory the role of the journalist is to present the story not sensor what could be presented.

If people once wondered how a mass populations could have been persuaded by the words of Hitler, why they did not stand up and stop what was happening in Germany at the time? It was because propaganda was used to stir the support of the common man. There was only one message and one agenda presented to the people in Germany at the time as there is only one message and agenda presented here at SmartPlatent. Those that participated in the propaganda had a moral duty that is true, so why did they not exercise it? Well, let?s ask the writers and presenters of SmartPlant the same question. At Nurinberg it was said ?never again? and yet 60 years latter it is happening again!
Posted by mario@...
26th Feb 2010
0 Votes
+ -
Nature vs Nurture in this debate?
Without regarding corporate influnces, historical events, regional, and cultural factors the evolutionary emphasis is somewhat shallow. Interesting but very parallel to other direct influences on how societies or individuals regard pollution and implementing sustainable measures.
CO2 has been regarded as either a bane (deadly irt asphyxiation) or useful depending on the situation; it is part of combustion, respiration, and other biological processes awa geochemical activities; it is involved with energy, industry, and manufacturing; but so are many other deadlier emissions and contaminants awa some seemingly benign components such as water vapor that are not getting their due regard. The runoff from human communities and industries reanges from contaminated to absolutely toxic.
The real issue is realizing how our lives affect the present and future environment then check the influences on our behaviour. Most likely the more insiduous and harmful influences will be due to corporate culture's attmepts to commercialize values. It isn't just about gaining opportunity for self growth and material comfort. Overindulgence and overconsumption has caused many to become absolutely out of touch with the grand effects of this material-driven value system; it is very one way and self-directed, but it also affects how we perceive each other as human beings and how people try to make amends for their travails too. The "evolutionary" aspect is possible as selective mechanisms are identified and enacted (either synthetically or out of human control) then the mutations and culling that results are observed; any behavioural responses that were already possible but just latent in their expression or utilization aren't really evolutionary but already an inherent capability, people simply had to be taught how to respond in a way that enables their personal survival and the future of their progeny.
Posted by donnydo77@...
9th Mar 2010
0 Votes
+ -
This "Professor" is Totalitarian
Here is what the good professor says, "In order to curb our natural tendencies, we need to institute policies that will force us to do that. That gets really tricky, saying to people, ?You surrender your rights to some sort of central body.? But I think that?s what going to be required.?

This one paragraph is all you need to know about this man. If left in charge, he would be a dictator. He knows, better than everyone else put together, what is best for all of us.

That combined with his absurd arguments about human evolution and the response to "global warming" render him unworthy of his position. May this man never be in a position of power.
Posted by Bob C User
11th May 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: How to combat global warming - by overcoming evolution
The folks in East Anglia exercised their frontal lobes quite a bit to fudge the numbers and to marginalize any scientist who found conflicting evidence -- regardless of how highly-regarded that scientist may have been previously. If he didn't drink the global warming Kool-Aid, that person and anyone who published his/her findings were ostracized. orjin krem
Posted by osoz
26th Mar 2011
0 Votes
+ -
RE: How to combat global warming - by overcoming evolution
I will give up my cosmetics as soon as the government gives me that frontal lobatamy I wil need to believe all this
global warming crap!
Posted by MontanaMamma
1st Apr 2011
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!