Follow this blog:
RSS

Behind the bionic eye

By | June 24, 2010, 2:55 AM PDT

In March, the research company Bionic Vision Australia announced the development of a bionic eye meant to ease suffering from degenerative vision loss. The company’s director, Anthony Burkitt, answered my questions this week.

How was the bionic eye made?

Making a bionic eye is an extremely complex task, but the team at Bionic Vision Australia brings together world leaders in each of the areas required for the development of this technology, such as medicine, engineering and biotechnology. By tapping into the best scientific expertise across the country, we are able to take a leading role internationally in bionic vision.

We are still in the process of developing a bionic eye suitable for human clinical trials. This device has been 10 years in the making, but we are confident that we now have the technology suitable for trials and commercialisation. Bionic Vision Australia is a consortium of researchers from the University of New South Wales, the University of Melbourne, National ICT Australia, the Bionic Ear Institute and the Centre for Eye Research Australia.

How does it work?

The bionic eye prototype consists of a camera attached to a pair of glasses which transmits high frequency radio signals to a microchip implanted in the retina. Electrodes in the chip then convert these signals into electrical impulses to stimulate the remaining cells in the retina that connect to the optic nerve. The impulses are then interpreted by the visual cortex of the brain as an image. With this technology, we anticipate that sight can be restored to a level where users of the bionic eye are no longer legally blind.

Who would use it?

This technology requires some cells to still be functioning in the retina and for the visual pathway from the retina to the brain to still be intact. As such, the bionic eye will be of most use to patients suffering from degenerative visual-impairment conditions, such as retinitis pigmentosa and age-related macular degeneration. Following the successful adoption of the bionic eye with these patient groups, we hope to expand the application of the technology to address a broader range of visual-impairment conditions.

Retinitis pigmentosa, the predominant cause of inherited blindness, affects 1.5 million people worldwide and is characterised by the progressive loss of photoreceptor cells over the patient’s life. Age-related macular degeneration usually affects people over the age of 65 and results in the loss of vision in the centre of the visual field. It is responsible for 48 percent of all legal blindness in Australia.

When will it be available?

Developing a bionic eye for human use is a major project, but we believe that by 2011 we will be ready to undertake the first clinical trials of the first advanced prototype. We plan to have a prototype ready for commercial development by 2014.

How could this device lead to other advances in bionic technology?

Through the development of the bionic eye, we have addressed a number of key scientific issues in bionic technology. For example, the work of the Bionic Ear Institute has led to a safe electrode-tissue interface so surviving cells can be stimulated. The Materials Institute at the University of Melbourne has developed polychrystaline diamond materials, such as Boron-doped diamond and Nitrogen-doped diamond with conductivity properties. National ICT Australia has been working on techniques for safe, wireless transmission of data and power to the implant. These scientific advances have the potential to enable other medical bionic applications, such as electrical stimulation for the management of epileptic seizures and spinal cord conditions.

Related on SmartPlanet:

Image: Anthony Burkitt / Courtesy of Bionic Vision Australia

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Christina Hernandez Sherwood

About Christina Hernandez Sherwood

Christina Hernandez Sherwood is a contributing writer for SmartPlanet.

Christina Hernandez Sherwood

Christina Hernandez Sherwood

Contributing Writer

Christina Hernandez Sherwood has written for the Los Angeles Times, Newsday, the Philadelphia Inquirer, Diverse: Issues in Higher Education and Columbia Journalism Review. She holds degrees from the University of Delaware and Columbia University's Graduate School of Journalism. She is based in New Jersey.

Follow her on Twitter.

Christina Hernandez Sherwood

Christina Hernandez Sherwood

In the unlikely event that Christina has a professional or financial relationship with a company she writes about, it will be prominently disclosed.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

2
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Behind the bionic eye
Fascinating. I was born with congenital nystagmus, a largely currently uncorrectable neurological condition, etc. 71, this probably won't be on market for things like this in my lifetime--but I'd volunteer as a guinea pig in early testing if acceptable-- but I know some younger people.
Now how will the group ever make any money on this in the foreseeable future under either Australian, British, or the new U.S. health care financing system? How long will it take before this technology is available to experimental human subjects much less covered by Medicare and whatever may be left of private insurance?
Posted by Transaction7
24th Jun 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Behind the bionic eye
@Transaction7
I suspect they will make money under the Australian and
European, single and multi payer systems, as well as the
Canadian and US systems, the same way every other medical
device manufacturer does. By selling it.

You appear to be arguing from tired dogma, unclouded by such
trivialities as facts. Do you claim that medical devices are not for
sale anywhere other than the US? Do you claim that these
devices are not developed anywhere but countries with purely
market-based health care delivery systems? If you, you are
sorely mistaken. The idea that the US has the best healthcare in
the world, as well as the idea that this is principally due to our
market system is not only ludicrous, it is not born out by facts.
In fact, the US is close to last in most major health care metrics,
including life expectancy and infant mortality, among developed
nations, even though we spend, on average, almost three times
more.
And before you spout more tired dogma, these statistics hold
EVEN if you only include data on people who can afford top-
notch health insurance.
Posted by DeusExMachina
24th Jun 2010
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet Community and join the conversation! Signing-up is free and quick, Do it now, we want to hear your opinion.