It is a 2-way street. The new recruits should be far more committed to their first jobs in order to build their technical knowledge, experience, people skills, and understanding of the aerospace industry.
This idea of moving jobs every year or 2, as well as gaining new engineering responsibility every year or less shows the desire for instant gratification, lack of patience, lack of commitment, and lack of reality.
In the high technology environment, projects can take up to several years to complete. Similarly, failure analysis can take 2-3 years followed by the time required for implementation of recommendations. Take the example of airplane accidents or even the 2 Space Shuttle accidents (STS-51L/STS-25, STS-107).
As large systems (IT, Telecom, Aircraft, Spacecraft, Chemical Processing Plants, etc) grow in complexity, so does the requirement for problem-solving, good design skills, solid knowledge, patience, perserverance, and the ability to recover from a bad experience. These do not come overnight, or in one or 2 years in a particular job function.
So, who will do this work if all of these millenials are moving around every year ?
What is sad is that millenials have grown up in an age of TV, Internet and handheld gadgets that provide them instant access to their desires, and this directly matches the findings of the survey above. Take these things away, and then see if they can function.
I would rather have 10 engineers with solid experience and commitment to an endeavor, rather than 100 nomads who will pack up and bolt at the first sign of difficulty.
Sorry for the ramblings of a disillusioned "old" engineer.
How can the aerospace industry keep talented new recruits in its workforce pool? Offer flexible job assignments and a variety of projects, according to the “2009 Survey of Aerospace Student Attitudes.”
The survey culled the attitudes last spring of 600 aerospace engineering sophomores and seniors at 23 schools across the country. An overwhelming majority of the respondents were male (80 percent), U.S. citizens (96 percent) and Caucasian (73 percent).
Among the survey’s findings:
- The students selected salary, excitement, location and work/life balance as the four most important job attributes. While they felt that the aerospace industry compared more favorably on aspects of salary and excitement, they felt it compared less favorably on location and work/life balance.
- Students expect significant mobility, moving jobs and even changing careers as often as every year or two.
- 47 percent of students expect to gain new engineering responsibility every year or less.
- Over 70 percent of students want to work for different companies or organizations over the course of their careers.
When presenting the findings this month, Annalisa Weigel of the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, who is also an assistant professor of aeronautics and astronautics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, said:
“These data are indicative of the values and desires of the millennial workforce, those workers born between 1981 and 2000. Their desires — from what they value, to how they expect to work — do not clearly align with the traditional aerospace industry. In order to attract a vibrant future workforce, the aerospace industry will need to change perceptions of what it has to offer. In addition, we saw that experiences at college can have a small negative influence on aerospace students’ attitudes about the industry, so there is work to do in the academic higher education arena as well. Balancing the next generation’s desires with the demands of the workplace will require commitment from the entire aerospace community, but we believe this survey aids in the important first step of recognizing the gap.”
Image: National Aerospace Plane program / Courtesy of NASA Langley Research Center
